Originally Posted by
lunghushan
IMHO fighting with hard contact isn't necessarily important. Take taiji, for example where they have partner forms and a lot of grappling and weapons -- they might not do full contact unstructured fighting, but does that mean they are any less than a school that does boxing or kickboxing?
any less of a school? Depends on what you are looking for.
Most schools that do a lot of hard contact like boxing and kickboxing don't have a heck of a lot of technique. Combos are about all they really get into. They don't do anything with weapons at all.
that has nothing to do with inclusion of weapons. muay thai and boxing are weaponless arts, period. And there is plenty of technique beyond combos. When I did train CMA and JKD, we drilled with live weapons and did spar with contact on occasion, though those occasions became more rare as time over the years.
Does that mean that the school with hard contact will beat the school without most of the time? Perhaps, if they don't train well, but definitely not with weapons.
In other words, this argument is kindof moot -- like comparing apples to string beans or something.
I don't think there's really an argument. we're just discussing the 95 (or 80) percenters.
i'm nobody...i'm nobody. i'm a tramp, a bum, a hobo... a boxcar and a jug of wine... but i'm a straight razor if you get to close to me.
-Charles Manson
I will punch, kick, choke, throw or joint manipulate any nationality equally without predjudice.
- Shonie Carter