I'm just curious what the basis for your statement that "taiji is the father of martial arts" since there is no historical or factual basis for that claim.
Don't get me wrong, Taiji is great when done correctly, but father of all martial arts?
I think there would at least be some Shuai Chiao people that would debate this claim, not to mention all the martial artists from other countries that can easily point to native arts that pre-date taiji. I make no claims to being an historian on Chinese martial arts, but aren't the earliest claims about the origins only going back to the 1600s. What about the martial arts that came before that?
And setting aside history, what about arts that are based on completely different principles, surely taiji is not the father of these?
There are people here who know far more than I do, when you start an announcement with a claim that can't be substantiated what does that do to your credibility?
The more one sweats in times of peace, the less one bleeds in times of war.