What I don't get about Terence is why he <seems to> align himself with WCK at all..
From his numerous writings I see that Terence doesn't think the founders of WCK knew jack schit about fighting, and that goes for most all CMA and everyone's lineage..
He doesn't seem to follow much if any of the traditional WCK training, including form work; he doesn't seem to recognize any real differences between kick boxing/boxing/MT/WCK in terms of fighting technique; He is constantly holding up examples of those who actually fight well, but are never WCK folks; He states that unless you prove you can fight and fight well against someone who has 'proven skills' then what you say is meaningless in the first place, yet he provides no proof, nor is there any evidence of, him living up to his own 'walk the walk' standards..
So, why in the world is Terence involved in and constantly pontificating on WCK at all?
Last edited by YungChun; 07-13-2007 at 06:54 AM.
Jim Hawkins
M Y V T K F
"You should have kicked him in the ball_..."—Sifu