Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 33 of 33

Thread: Shaolin Defined

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canada!
    Posts
    23,110
    I didn't know we were talking about shaolin do, but yes, I agree, to claim grandmastery is spurious at best claim wise and there are many other suspect aspects to the organization in general, but that's going on in another thread.
    Kung Fu is good for you.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Permanent state of Denial
    Posts
    2,272
    Quote Originally Posted by B-Rad View Post
    Of course Shaolin-Do goes far beyond just claiming to be traced back to Shaolin to the head teacher claiming to be THE grandmaster of ALL of Shaolin while teaching forms from many other styles that have verifiable origins that have nothing to do with Shaolin, and having lots of b.s. stories about his own training background... not to mention him or other high ranking black belts actively spreading new lies It's an important distinction imo.
    LOL.....that's as big and inaccurate a generalization as those propagated (I admit, it's true), by Shaolin-Do marketers.

    But let's get back on track. I was only seeing if you guys who think Shaolin is wide-spanning and hard to define or even typify would live up to your word when faced with the specter of accepting SD....LOL...

    The horror.....the horror.....

  3. #33
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Columbus, OH
    Posts
    773
    Whoops, didn't read the whole thread. Popped in partway down the second page and saw Shaolin-Do discussion from the Wookie. Thought I'd get my two cents in before the thread got locked or combined with the massive SD thread. Will try to keep in on topic

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •