Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 95

Thread: Yanfan (Franco Testini)

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    ᏌᏂᎭᎢ, ᏥᎾ
    Posts
    3,257
    Quote Originally Posted by GeneChing View Post
    the Shaolin Warrior Monk Reserve Team
    that is the name of master deyang's school in english, "wuseng houbeidui", where members are trained in traditional wugong and chan, as warrior monks would. some of his students after personal training and study have then taken discipleship under him.

    but the "warrior monk reserve team" is not a class of monk that master deyang initiated, but a preparatory training base which he originally started in the mid-90's with ven. shi suxi to develop secular students external to the monastery, hence the name. so to be a member does not mean one has taken any level of ordination, as you can see.
    Last edited by LFJ; 07-08-2010 at 03:58 PM.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Fremont, CA, U.S.A.
    Posts
    47,947

    Yes, we know that...

    ...but most people don't. The very fact that you need to explain it demonstrates how it can be misleading. It all falls back on the wuseng class, which is poorly defined in the public eye. They just see a bald robed guy and read 'Shaolin monk'.

    Another person of interest here would be Juan Carlos Aguilar, aka Huang Aguilar. Here's his site - www.shaolinmonastery.org - nice web addy, eh? Juan and I had some Shaolin adventures together back in the mid '90s. He put out a DVD - Shaolin Kung Fu Encyclopedia - here's a quote from the sell text:
    In this encyclopedia, Juan Carlos Aguilar, the only Western monk recognized by the Temple and with the approval of the unveils the true Shaolin Kung fu.
    Gene Ching
    Publisher www.KungFuMagazine.com
    Author of Shaolin Trips
    Support our forum by getting your gear at MartialArtSmart

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    ᏌᏂᎭᎢ, ᏥᎾ
    Posts
    3,257
    Quote Originally Posted by GeneChing View Post
    The very fact that you need to explain it
    its explained on that same page, and elsewhere on the site, which means the reader made assumptions after having failed to actually take care in understanding what they were reading.

    same thing happens with understanding what wuseng are, when people judge them by the standards of fully ordained monks, just because "monk" is part of the term "warrior monk", and they dress that way.

    the fault is not of the wuseng, but belongs to those who judge without making an effort to understand the shaolin culture.

    It all falls back on the wuseng class, which is poorly defined in the public eye. They just see a bald robed guy and read 'Shaolin monk'.
    the fault here lies on those who make assumptions without proper familiarity of the culture. thats the major issue in the western world regarding shaolin- everyone has something to say, but few actually bother educating themselves on the topic.

    you'll notice in this thread, when several clarifications concerning yanfan's legitimacy and sincerity were made, his critics suddenly disappeared....

    so what was the point of dogging on him? just for the love of controversy?

    i personally havent met yanfan and dont know much about him, whether what he says is accurate or not, but i think it is unfair to denounce someone without even bothering to look into their history as they state it.

    like questioning the sincerity of his buddhist devotion because he hasnt ordained elsewhere besides shaolin, when in fact, he has, at a young age, as can be read clearly on his website.

    it is also unfair to lump someone in with all the people making large claims of monkhood, when nowhere have they claimed any level of ordination or even a generation name.

    like those for example;

    In this encyclopedia, Juan Carlos Aguilar, the only Western monk recognized by the Temple and with the approval of the unveils the true Shaolin Kung fu.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Skid Row Adjacent
    Posts
    2,391
    Quote Originally Posted by LFJ View Post
    you'll notice in this thread, when several clarifications concerning yanfan's legitimacy and sincerity were made, his critics suddenly disappeared....

    so what was the point of dogging on him? just for the love of controversy?

    i personally havent met yanfan and dont know much about him, whether what he says is accurate or not, but i think it is unfair to denounce someone without even bothering to look into their history as they state it.

    like questioning the sincerity of his buddhist devotion because he hasnt ordained elsewhere besides shaolin, when in fact, he has, at a young age, as can be read clearly on his website.

    it is also unfair to lump someone in with all the people making large claims of monkhood, when nowhere have they claimed any level of ordination or even a generation name.
    I still don't buy it. Granted it appears he was ordained as monk. However, having seen his gong fu and having spoken with people who were privy to his time at shaolin; he spent little time training there, certainly not enough to be considered a warrior monk (unless Shaolin has lowered their standards dramatically).

    I would expect such a diligent researcher as yourself to look beyond
    Quote Originally Posted by LFJ View Post
    their history as they state it.
    to have noticed the discrepancies in his stated timeline.

    I'm only indirectly calling into question his Buddhist devotion insofar as he is seemingly misrepresenting himself for fame and/or profit.

    This is no love of controversy, rather a response to what are genuinely felt to be misleading claims made in an article in a major metropolitan publication.

    On a side note, I just returned from a breif visit to Shaolin Si and saw that there are in fact foreigners training at the temple proper (a few Ukranian nationals and a German I believe), as to their level of ordination the Chan monk I discussed it with was unsure. He mentioned that they are training Gong Fu, Chan and massage

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    ᏌᏂᎭᎢ, ᏥᎾ
    Posts
    3,257
    wenshu,

    i was mainly referring to ghostexorcist when he said:

    Quote Originally Posted by ghostexorcist View Post
    If the guy truly wanted to be a Buddhist monk, he could have gone to any number of places to gain his ordination.
    this appears to be denouncing the guy without a solid case, and without even really attempting to look into it. because if you read his website he writes of a korean ordination in his early 20's. this is taken at his word, but still.

    you have of course made a much better case, which doesnt appear to just be for the sake of controversy.

    Quote Originally Posted by wenshu View Post
    I would expect such a diligent researcher as yourself to look beyond

    to have noticed the discrepancies in his stated timeline.

    I'm only indirectly calling into question his Buddhist devotion insofar as he is seemingly misrepresenting himself for fame and/or profit.

    This is no love of controversy, rather a response to what are genuinely felt to be misleading claims made in an article in a major metropolitan publication.
    right, i'm sure there's much more to it than meets the eye. like i said, i'm not really in a position to know any of the details. and honestly i'm not particularly interested to do a deep investigation of his situation. i dont find it necessary.

    if you understand shaolin culture, you wouldnt need to question anyone's claims. because they would become glaringly obvious.

    i just wish more people interested in shaolin would take the time to study the culture, and not speak on politics if just for the sake of controversy. all that serves is to damage each other, and fill the air with more air.

    but i notice that much of shaolin culture is inaccessible to the western world because they dont speak enough chinese - for one - and because a lot of it is not available in english as of yet. not just shaolin but buddhism, and chinese buddhism in particular, is largely in its infancy or non-existent in the west. many important chinese sources have yet to be translated or even touched by westerners.

    thats part of the reason i started sharing some culture articles a couple years back. kind of anonymously. just to make it available. it was only when another shaolin disciple of master deyang suggested and urged i start teaching here. and when master deyang approved i had to open up a bit.

    some people emailed me saying they felt it was like one of the "highlights in supporting and spreading the shaolin 'philosophy' without any other purpose than 'supporting and spreading the shaolin philosophy' has now been put in line with those who have schools and businesses"...

    but its kind of necessary. everyone has their reasons and aims for being involved in shaolin, and aspirations for what they wish to do with it. its a natural evolution.

    give shaolin and buddhism another hundred years or so in the west. it will be interesting to see what becomes of it.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Skid Row Adjacent
    Posts
    2,391

    Agreed

    Thanks for making that clear. I was somewhat perplexed when I saw this thread was still active after about a week or so. Don't really want to continue beating a dead horse.

    I'm in complete agreement with you regarding the confusion surrounding Shaolin. The language is the door to the culture; Shaolin, Buddhist or otherwise.

    Unfortunately I cannot help myself but get caught up in the fog of petty politics on occasion, especially when it is so close to home. But if I was perfect what would I have to cultivate?

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Cincinnat, OH, USA
    Posts
    595
    Quote Originally Posted by LFJ View Post
    You'll notice in this thread, when several clarifications concerning yanfan's legitimacy and sincerity were made, his critics suddenly disappeared....

    so what was the point of dogging on him? just for the love of controversy?

    i[...]

    like questioning the sincerity of his buddhist devotion because he hasnt ordained elsewhere besides shaolin, when in fact, he has, at a young age, as can be read clearly on his website.
    Quote Originally Posted by LFJ View Post
    wenshu,

    i was mainly referring to ghostexorcist [...]

    his appears to be denouncing the guy without a solid case, and without even really attempting to look into it. because if you read his website he writes of a korean ordination in his early 20's. this is taken at his word, but still.

    you have of course made a much better case, which doesnt appear to just be for the sake of controversy.
    I never disappeared, I just don't live on the forum like a lot of people do. I think the fact that I've been a member for almost 4 years and I only have 300 sum posts shows that. Work, school, and life in general keeps me pretty busy. I drop by every few days or say just to see if anything interesting has been posted.

    My points were not made for the "love of controversy". That sounds like something only a troll would do. I just questioned whether the entire situation was kosher or not. I mean a westerner receiving the Jieba and then being made the abbot of the LA Shaolin temple just seemed fishy to me at the time. Because he took his vows in Korea, I'll concede he might actually be a devout Buddhist, but the whole Shaolin aspect seems like a way of making money.
    Last edited by ghostexorcist; 07-11-2010 at 04:52 AM.

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    ᏌᏂᎭᎢ, ᏥᎾ
    Posts
    3,257
    Quote Originally Posted by ghostexorcist View Post
    Because he took his vows in Korea, I'll concede he might actually be a devout Buddhist, but the whole Shaolin aspect seems like a way of making money.
    a lot of people seem to have this sort of view - and i'm not saying that you necessarily do - that if someone is involved with shaolin, then they must not be sincere buddhists, that its just for the recognition, martial arts, or something. as if shaolin cannot be taken seriously as a buddhist monastery and a tradition for dharma practice.

    its unfair to assume that one cannot be involved in shaolin and be taken seriously as a buddhist practitioner. a lot of that has to do with the image of recent events and the direction of the monastery as of late, and those who take advantage of the name, but that people come to shaolin for whatever reason means they have some karmic connection with it, which predates any sort of modern business approach to spreading the tradition.

    i remember master deyang speaking to me of three wishes he has for shaolin in the world. one was for the dissolving of this image of shaolin monks being uncultured martial artists who cannot be taken seriously as buddhist monks, and that martial arts cannot be a vehicle for dharma practice.

    shortly after this conversation is when i began work on making shaolin culture articles easily available in english. the latest one is on "shaolin warrior ethics", which is strongly influenced by traditional buddhist literature.

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Fremont, CA, U.S.A.
    Posts
    47,947

    Unfair? This is a web forum. A martial arts web forum.

    LFJ, point taken on lumping Yanfan in 'with all the people making large claims of monkhood' and recant that. Those others can warrant their own threads someday perhaps.

    However, I don't think it controversial for controversy's sake. Shaolin has a lot of controversy. It always has. To not engage that is to be mindless and that flies in the face of Shaolin's fundamental philosophy of mindfulness.

    I've met Yanfan. We met at Songshan Shaolin Day last year. We broke his story in The First American Branded at Shaolin Temple By Melissa Leon-Guerrero Do in our November/December Shaolin Special 2007 issue. I think being the first Westerner to get jieba at Shaolin is pretty **** cool. I wish it had been me. Nevertheless, Yanfan's controversy will continue, as it will for every one who steps up to claim that 'first Western Shaolin monk' title. This is exactly as it should be. That's a title that really needs to be earned.
    Gene Ching
    Publisher www.KungFuMagazine.com
    Author of Shaolin Trips
    Support our forum by getting your gear at MartialArtSmart

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Austin, Tx
    Posts
    375
    Controversy, you want controversy, well I claim to be the first western Shaolin Grand Puba. How's that for controversy. And yes I practice kungfu in my rather large blue fur hat.

  11. #41
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Fremont, CA, U.S.A.
    Posts
    47,947

    tsk, tsk, sha0lin1

    I believe you are misrepresenting yourself as a Shaolin Grand Puba.
    Gene Ching
    Publisher www.KungFuMagazine.com
    Author of Shaolin Trips
    Support our forum by getting your gear at MartialArtSmart

  12. #42
    Quote Originally Posted by ghostexorcist View Post
    ...but the whole Shaolin aspect seems like a way of making money.
    THAT always gives me a chuckle.

    what is the guy driving? he pushing a range or something? a fat pad overlooking the valley or whatever the hell prime LA real estate is all about?

    We all know Gene's frakking caking over Shaolin, just look at his blinged out grills, lohan custom lexus on 22s, and all the silk pjs he's got.

    You start Shaolin, and you instantly cake!!!

  13. #43
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Fremont, CA, U.S.A.
    Posts
    47,947

    Cake indeed

    Yea, I'm just happy I could afford new brakes on my Honda Fit today. The book sales helped.

    If I was the Shaolin Grand Puba, I'd be rocking the phat jade bling and be carried in on a palanquin by a bevy of nacho ninjettes. If only I was the Shaolin Grand Puba....
    Gene Ching
    Publisher www.KungFuMagazine.com
    Author of Shaolin Trips
    Support our forum by getting your gear at MartialArtSmart

  14. #44
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Austin, Tx
    Posts
    375
    Yah, well you're not, I am, there can only be one. You can, however, join the Bedrock sect and become one of my minions. Now that I have met you, you seem cool enough. Tell me Gene do you have fur robes you can wear?

  15. #45
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Skid Row Adjacent
    Posts
    2,391
    Quote Originally Posted by GeneChing View Post
    I believe you are misrepresenting yourself as a Shaolin Grand Puba.
    Anyone with even a cursory knowledge of shaolin traditions knows that the Shaolin Grand Pubas receive the jie ba on their ass cheeks.

    Pictures or it didn't happen.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •