"Fantasy-base" martial arts

[KPM]

Terence wrote on another belabored thread:

[B]I've been "in" WCK for almost 25 years now, and I've seen many of the "masters" and "grandmasters", and I've seen lots of WCK people, and I've seen many WCK videos, read many WCK books, attended many WCK seminars, etc. And for the overwhelming part, they all teach fantasy-based martial art.

What do I mean by fantasy-based martial art. Well, they don't *start* with something they can really do (and really do use) in fighting and then teach that to others (which would be reality-based martial art) -- like they do in the functional martial arts like BJJ for example. They teach things that they don't really do, and have never done in fighting but teach instead from a theoretical perspective (from a concept or idea of what they believe they can do) and then use unrealistic exercises to practice and reinforce these things (so they begin with a fantasy, and that's the base of what they do). And then if they do "spar", you don't see the very things they practice to do come out at all or if they do, very infrequently or not as they train to do them. [B]

I thought this might make an interesting discussion. While I think that Terrence's central point has some validity, I also think he is using a straw-man argument. It seems like BJJ is the example most often held up of what a "functional" martial art should be like. But even BJJ has found out in recent years that it has had to do some changing and evolving. Terrence says that "fantasy-based" martial arts are those that "teach things that they don't really do, and have never done in fighting." The problem is....who really "fights" anymore? BJJ has discovered that a vast amount of the technique they were teaching for BJJ tournaments simply does not work in an MMA setting, which is closer to "real" fighting. A high percentage of the really slick moves that you see in BJJ tournaments where the opponent is competing under the same mindset simply don't show up often at all in MMA. So is the rolling that the BJJ guys do really all that different from doing Chi Sao? Is BJJ really the "reality" martial art icon that Terrence would have us believe?

Don't get me wrong. I give BJJ kudos for being progressive and willing to adapt and change as needed. This is something that WCK needs to do as well. But BJJ is just as guilty as WCK of developing and teaching technique that is not based on "real" fighting. Rolling with a partner in the gym or in a tournament is not "real" fighting, just like Chi Sao and sparring are not "real" fighting. BJJ is a good example of what a progressive and modern martial art should look like. But let's not give them TOO much credit! Labeling one method as "reality" and the other as "fantasy" is not very useful. Lets just get to training and do our best to progress and evolve.

Keith

[anerlich]

You misspelled Terence's name! He gets peeved when you do that.

[LoneTiger108]

I thought this might make an interesting discussion. While I think that Terrence's central point has some validity, I also think he is using a straw-man argument.

I find it interesting that a thread is actually created in the name of someone who others are trying to ban. I like some of T's posts to be honest, but he has also cheesed me off sometimes, like most others here. But hey! I've ruffled a few feathers myself, so I can't play all angelic lol!

I can't get used to this place! All good though. All good.

[Knifefighter]

But BJJ is just as guilty as WCK of developing and teaching technique that is not based on "real" fighting. Rolling with a partner in the gym or in a tournament is not "real" fighting, just like Chi Sao and sparring are not "real" fighting. BJJ is a good example of what a progressive and modern martial art should look like. But let's not give them TOO much credit! Labeling one method as "reality" and the other as "fantasy" is not very useful. Lets just get to training and do our best to progress and evolve.

BJJ has three distinct divisions- gi, no gi, and vale tudo/mma.

Each division has particular techniques suited to each particular environment. The differerence between BJJ and fantasy MA's is that each of the divisions of BJJ includes full force sparring and competing against fully resisting opponents.

[t_niehoff]

Keith, the simplest way to see what a fantasy-based martial art is to look at where the strategies, tactics, tools, etc. come from (or, perhaps more precisely, how they are shown to be used) -- do they come from experience in fighting, in actually doing those things, seeing that they work well, and then training them, teaching them, etc. or do they come from something besides actual experience, like theory, unrealistic drills, etc. The former is reality-based martial art, the latter fantasy-based martial art (fantasy-based arts like to say they come from experience, but you of course never see it).

BJJ is a reality-based martial art. The techniques, strategies, tactics, etc. they teach, train, etc. are those that they have found through actual experience fighitng work and continue to work in sparring. When your BJJ instructor teaches you, he teaches you from experience, teaching you those things that he *knows* works -- becasue he's either done them or at the very least seen them done, repeatedly, consistently, at high levels of resisitance, in sparring. That is not how fantasy-based martial arts teach or train.

Much of what is trained, taught, etc, in WCK is fantasy -- it is not the stuff people really do or can really do when they fight, it is stuff they fantasize they can do when they fight.

Here is a fantasy sequence from a WCK website:

http://www.wingchunkwoon.com/movie_v....flv&filesize=

This is fantasy -- no one will ever be able to really do any of that they way it is done in the clip. It's not like they took what really happens in fighting and have demo'ed it. Now, someone can argue that this is just to show the "principles" of WCK. But that begs the question: why demo the "principles" in a way you could never use them?!

So let me ask you: if you train to do stuff like this but can never really do it, how effective is that training? In my view, you would be wasting yoru time. If you can't do in fighting the things you train to do as you train them, aren't you just doing fantasy?

And, btw, to piggy-back on what Dale said, from my perspective fighting is adaptive. And so will adapt your tools, strategies, tactics, etc. to the situation at hand. You take your training in BJJ and adapt it to sport, whether gi or no gi, to vale tudo, to street, etc. It's all fighting. Realistic skills work in anyb realsitic environment, situation. You just need to adapt them.

[k gledhill]

great Dale and T telling everyone what is and what isnt VT ... ignore thread

[sanjuro_ronin]

I like fantasy-based MA, you can get to be a jedi or a samurai or a medieval knight, cool stuff like that.
Maybe get a job at medieval times and hit on the wenches.
Fantasy is cool, you can live vicariously through others too, you can pretend you are Rickson, or BJ Penn even

And great fun is had by all !

Pass the chicken and ribs wench !!

[JPinAZ]

And, btw, to piggy-back on what Dale said, from my perspective fighting is adaptive. And so will adapt your tools, strategies, tactics, etc. to the situation at hand. You take your training in BJJ and adapt it to sport, whether gi or no gi, to vale tudo, to street, etc. It's all fighting. Realistic skills work in anyb realsitic environment, situation. You just need to adapt them.

Forgetting all the other BS, could you please explain how you 'adapt' BJJ to a street fight where you wish to remain on your feet and not go to the ground? (in case you have to deal with multiple opponents, or just wish to remove yourself from the fight by running, whatever)

[sanjuro_ronin]

Forgetting all the other BS, could you please explain how you 'adapt' BJJ to a street fight where you wish to remain on your feet and not go to the ground? (in case you have to deal with multiple opponents, or just wish to remove yourself from the fight by running, whatever)

Its a fallacy that BJJ is al about ground work, BJJ as applied to MMA /Vale Tudo incorporates the stand up of Muay Thai, boxing and wrestling.

[JPinAZ]

Its a fallacy that BJJ is al about ground work, BJJ as applied to MMA /Vale Tudo incorporates the stand up of Muay Thai, boxing and wrestling.

Sounds like you are saying, to 'apply' BJJ in stand up, you use something else.. like MT, boxing, wrestling, etc. Doesn't sound like BJJ to me, sounds like something else

My question was directly relating to T's post about BJJ being able to adapt to the situation at hand... which IMO is, well, for now I'll keep it to myself until reading his reply

[t_niehoff]

Forgetting all the other BS, could you please explain how you 'adapt' BJJ to a street fight where you wish to remain on your feet and not go to the ground? (in case you have to deal with multiple opponents, or just wish to remove yourself from the fight by running, whatever)

Oh, it's not BS -- fantasy-based MAs abound. And they are easy to spot.

What you wish to do in any fight doesn't mean that will happen. It would be nice if we had that control. We very often don't.

[JPinAZ]

What you wish to do in any fight doesn't mean that will happen. It would be nice if we had that control. We very often don't.

no kidding? wow, I think that's the key we've all been missing

There you go gain, totally avoiding the question YET AGAIN.

Here, I'll try it again -
In case you forgot already, you said "... You take your training in BJJ and adapt it to sport, whether gi or no gi, to vale tudo, to street, etc. It's all fighting. Realistic skills work in anyb realsitic environment, situation. You just need to adapt them."

to which I said "could you please explain how you 'adapt' BJJ to a street fight where you wish to remain on your feet and not go to the ground? (in case you have to deal with multiple opponents, or just wish to remove yourself from the fight by running, whatever)"

So, again, just so we know you are on the level and not just trolling - How do you take your trianing in BJJ and adapt it to the street if you want to stay standing and keep it there? (forget the sport crap too, you were specifically saying it's all fighting)
Just for grins, since you said it, back it up for once. Or do you not have to qualify ANYTHING you say?

[JPinAZ]

Oh, it's not BS -- fantasy-based MAs abound. And they are easy to spot.
.

ok, list the one's you've spotted
And nothing general, get right down to the point and give solid examples. List practitioners, lineages, etc if you'd like. Be specific as possible so we know where you're coming from. Typical answers like "all fantasy-based WC, or aikido, etc" don't count.

[air]

You know something, threads like this sorta eerk the bejebis out of me. Is that even a word?

I don't claim to know how other people train, but Ive been training as a private student for a very long time now. I train a good 4 hours a day for myself and teach on top of that. Thats 4 hours everyday day in and day out year after year.

I think this topic has nothing to do with wing chun and everything to do with individual people.

How does one train should be the question. Not everyone foams at the mouth when they see violence some people actually prefer never to fight. Over the years I have gotten fractures , dislocated joints etc... Thats from training very realistically. Training realistically hurts, not much room for error.

I want to address this next part to every person that remotely bashes wing chun in any fashion.

You personally have no idea what wing chun is or its purpose and have missed the boat entirely. You are the one listening to and creating the silly trash talk.

Maybe your mommy didn't tuck you in at night , who knows what the problem is.

I come to this forum because there are tons of great information here.

I train to know what a person feels like at touch and make my decision on what to do in a fraction of a second.

Yes I agree there is bad wing chun, but its not because a person wasn't taught by any particular linage of wing chun. Mostly its because said teacher is a bad teacher, and guess what every Martial system on the planet has that problem.

Do you guys watch the history channel, if so did you the episode of human weapon that showed wing chun.

Notice they put him against a 18yrold boy to fight, and in my eyes he won that fight , but barely. Did you also notice they didn't put him against the wing chun teacher. Why do you think that is ? Thats right because the wing chun teacher would have just dropped him where he stood.

Besides if you want Wing Chun to work you have to first stop caring about winning (forcing) a fight and just fight.

I want to ask you a question.

If someone you love with your entire heart and soul was in trouble, would you be able to help that person ?

Every person on this earth has a built in mechanism called fight or flight, Ya I know you all heard it before.

I have 2 daughters one is 4 and the other 10months old. They are my life I will protect them at all cost. My life is meaningless without them.

Wing Chun provides all the knowledge and skill you will ever need to defend yourself in a real life fight. Put wing chun in a sports enviroment and we lose hands down. We rely on sensitivity something Gloves any Gloves get in the way.
Besides I like to win fights fast and efficiently why would I want to play games were the rules don't favor true self-defense. All the ufc and programs like that have done is confuse people more.

Wing chun is close range fighting system , YOU know right before someone takes you to the ground. Ya I heard that 90percent of fights end up on the ground. I bet
you a good portion of that 10percent are wing chun fighters.

ALLS im saying is stop dissing wang chun Its a great system

[MisterNoobie]

This is fantasy -- no one will ever be able to really do any of that they way it is done in the clip. It's not like they took what really happens in fighting and have demo'ed it.

Terrrance, although i agree with some points you make i think the above is a circular argument....

So let me ask you: if you train to do stuff like this but can never really do it, how effective is that training? In my view, you would be wasting yoru time. If you can't do in fighting the things you train to do as you train them, aren't you just doing fantasy?

I do bjj terrance, and i suck at it. So even basic armbars, mount escapes, single leg takedowns are hard to do for me against skilled guys when we're going at it full force. Does this make bjj fantasy? I dont think so, it only means I suck at it? So i dont think that the above criteria alone is enough to put the official 'fantasy' stamp on any martial art.

And, btw, to piggy-back on what Dale said, from my perspective fighting is adaptive. And so will adapt your tools, strategies, tactics, etc. to the situation at hand. You take your training in BJJ and adapt it to sport, whether gi or no gi, to vale tudo, to street, etc. It's all fighting. Realistic skills work in anyb realsitic environment, situation. You just need to adapt them.

I disagree with this. Lets suppose gi bjj is a realistic skill. Lets also suppose that boxing is a realistic skill. And the ring is a realistic environment. Is my crappling gonna help me in th eboxing ring?

Why is it that gi grappling is assumed to be realistic to fighting? How bout sport tkd? judo? chi sao?