Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 18

Thread: Bringing CLF back into the fold...

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    543

    Bringing CLF back into the fold...

    Hi Southern Forumers-

    After a long hiatus from CLF (and from the kung fu forum) I feel ready to incorporate CLF back into the fold. I've been hitting the heavy bag at the gym that I go to and alot of what I've been doing is a combination of Chen Taiji, CLF and some boxing that I picked up.

    I don't know if I can bring it all back in. Some of it doesn't work so well with Taiji. I still have some issues with the long swinging strikes (which I've come to think are too slow and potentially harmful for my body type.)

    But honestly, I miss the CLF and I did it for so long that its kind of ingrained. So I'm looking for ways to incorporate it back in, even if not all of it.

    Cheers

    EO

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    490
    You can shorten your bridges easily. Not everything when working the bag has to be'' textbook form'' perfect.

  3. #3
    Why are the strikes too slow right now for you? What is it about your body type that it would not be suited for CLF?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Champaign, IL
    Posts
    89
    Quote Originally Posted by Eric Olson View Post
    I don't know if I can bring it all back in. Some of it doesn't work so well with Taiji. I still have some issues with the long swinging strikes (which I've come to think are too slow and potentially harmful for my body type.)
    Many of those long swinging strikes are meant (or at least can as well be used) as forearm strikes, not necessarily strikes with the fist. When you're in forearm range striking with these swinging strikes it makes it a lot harder to get outta the way.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    used to be in the yookay, but now in my own little world.
    Posts
    336
    Quote Originally Posted by Eric Olson View Post
    Hi Southern Forumers-

    After a long hiatus from CLF (and from the kung fu forum) I feel ready to incorporate CLF back into the fold. I've been hitting the heavy bag at the gym that I go to and alot of what I've been doing is a combination of Chen Taiji, CLF and some boxing that I picked up.

    I don't know if I can bring it all back in. Some of it doesn't work so well with Taiji. I still have some issues with the long swinging strikes (which I've come to think are too slow and potentially harmful for my body type.)

    But honestly, I miss the CLF and I did it for so long that its kind of ingrained. So I'm looking for ways to incorporate it back in, even if not all of it.

    Cheers

    EO
    Bags are a good training aid, but to get your strikes up to speed & the timing right you need partner work.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    543
    Ok...so here's my perspective.

    If you are a little guy (ie not a lot of mass) then you need a way to generate more force in your strikes. If you are a big guy you have more force but you need a way to generate more speed.

    So for a big guy like myself the long swinging strikes don't make much sense. Their designed to generate a lot of power, but in my case its really overkill. And crucial speed is sacrificed.

    For example, a strike that would be better for a big guy would be boxing hook over a Sau Chui. The hook is faster (less distance to travel, less inertia to overcome to initiate it.)

    I also have concerns about using the forearm as an anatomical weapon. In order to use it effectively you basically need to beat the hell out of it. In the long run, I don't think it is healthy for your bones, tendon and connective tissue.

    What makes more sense to me is a strike that forms a clear path from the ground to the striking surface. (That surface could be a fist, elbow, knee, foot or hip.) The ground is always "behind" the strike when you make contact, not just air, which is the case if you use the forearm.

    So what I'd like to do is retain some of those CLF techniques other than the long swinging strikes. However, I'm not sure if I'd really be doing CLF anymore.

    No response necessary, I'm basically just thinking out loud. But please chime in if you've got any million dollar ideas.

    Cheers

    EO

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    VanCity
    Posts
    437
    correct me if I'm wrong,
    but eric here sounds a lot like fu pow to me???
    Robert James
    5th Gen. Bak Hsing Kwoon
    bakhsingkwoon@gmail.com
    http://www.youtube.com/user/SatoriScience
    "Whip the pole like the dragon whips its tail. Punches are like a tiger sticking out its head!"

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    10,576
    Blog Entries
    6
    it IS fu pow!!!!!!!!!!

    fu pows real name is eric olson
    Hung Sing Boyz, we gottit on lock down
    when he's around quick to ground and pound a clown
    Bruh we thought you knew better
    when it comes to head huntin, ain't no one can do it better

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Lostin Austin
    Posts
    857
    Blog Entries
    3
    I'm sure you already know this, but I'll mention it anyway -

    as long as your core, that is, your feet, legs, knees, hips, waist, chest, shoulders are doing the the main mechanics, you can still be incorporating the concepts of CLF. Since CLF is so versatile, you can focus in on shorter range techniques, if you don't want to go long. Frank mentioned awhile ago to not forget about elbows and knees in their CLF. As long as that core has it's presence, it doesn't matter what you throw.

    How's NY?

    123
    The 10 Elements of Choy Lay Fut:
    Kum, Na, Gwa, Sau, Chop, Pow, Kup, Biu, Ding, Jong

    The 13 Principles of Taijiquan:
    Ward Off, Roll Back, Press, Push, Pluck, Elbow, Shoulder, Split, Forward, Back, Left, Right, Central Equilibrium

    And it doesn't hurt to practice stuff from:
    Mounts, Guards, and Side Mounts!


    Austin Kung-Fu Academy

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    new york,ny,U.S.A
    Posts
    3,230
    well considering that alot of the kung fu masters were little guys with not alot of mass and still generated alot of power it can be done. its body mechanics and using whole body and whipping power.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    VAN.B.C.
    Posts
    4,218
    Quote Originally Posted by Eric Olson View Post
    Ok...so here's my perspective.

    If you are a little guy (ie not a lot of mass) then you need a way to generate more force in your strikes. If you are a big guy you have more force but you need a way to generate more speed.

    So for a big guy like myself the long swinging strikes don't make much sense. Their designed to generate a lot of power, but in my case its really overkill. And crucial speed is sacrificed.

    For example, a strike that would be better for a big guy would be boxing hook over a Sau Chui. The hook is faster (less distance to travel, less inertia to overcome to initiate it.)

    I also have concerns about using the forearm as an anatomical weapon. In order to use it effectively you basically need to beat the hell out of it. In the long run, I don't think it is healthy for your bones, tendon and connective tissue.

    What makes more sense to me is a strike that forms a clear path from the ground to the striking surface. (That surface could be a fist, elbow, knee, foot or hip.) The ground is always "behind" the strike when you make contact, not just air, which is the case if you use the forearm.

    So what I'd like to do is retain some of those CLF techniques other than the long swinging strikes. However, I'm not sure if I'd really be doing CLF anymore.

    No response necessary, I'm basically just thinking out loud. But please chime in if you've got any million dollar ideas.

    Cheers

    EO

    no it's all in the footwork..if you can step fast into him you can swing just as quick...kung fu wasn't developed by people with fat bellies!.

    you shouldn't have a gut unless your teacher smokes opium...

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    543
    Quote Originally Posted by hskwarrior View Post
    it IS fu pow!!!!!!!!!!

    fu pows real name is eric olson
    Haha...actually Eric Olson's real name is Eric Olson. Fu-Pow is just a figment of your imagination.

    EO

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    10,576
    Blog Entries
    6
    nah, you/he will always be a hater
    Hung Sing Boyz, we gottit on lock down
    when he's around quick to ground and pound a clown
    Bruh we thought you knew better
    when it comes to head huntin, ain't no one can do it better

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Boca Raton, FL
    Posts
    2,342
    Now Frankie, play nice (at least for now )

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    51
    Quote Originally Posted by CLFNole View Post
    Now Frankie, play nice (at least for now )
    lol!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Havick

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •