Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 98

Thread: The Shaolin Monastery: History, Religion, and the Chinese Martial Arts by Meir Shahar

  1. #46
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Eastern State Mental Hospital Psych Ward, Room 12
    Posts
    656
    Quote Originally Posted by Mas Judt View Post
    Obviously it can't be a legitimate scholarly effort as there is no mention Su Kon Taijin nor a recognition of Grandmaster Sin The'.
    You are so right Mas. It can not be legit if it doesn't have Hair Man or GM Sin in it.

  2. #47
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    57
    I was a bit disapointed that he did not mention the modern wushu/traditional developement. It sounds as if everyone in and around Shaolin does Kung Fu like in the
    old times.

    I found it also onteresting that he mentions Wudang but says nothing about martial arts being practised there. So does this mean Wudang has no martial arts tradition?

    Anyway, it is an interesting book, but I feel it could cover more ground.

  3. #48
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canada!
    Posts
    23,110
    not quite finished yet, but overall it is good. he seems to have spent his time translating the many stele and got ihs hands on some old documentation. drew the lines between confirmed historical characters and the reality behind a few myths and lack of it behind others.

    the interesting part for me was about the worship of the military god and the whole sinews and flesh eating thing. that cleared up a few questions.

    anyone ever notice the similarity between paintings of bhodidharma and the god vajraprani. minus the fangs of course. also, black tiger whirlwind character from ootm bears similarity to this god.

    all in all, at least it gives you an idea of the actual history as opposed to all the "there were 10 temples of shaolin and several of them were dedicated to black scorpion and steve johnson krotty as far back as 6 thousand years ago" that we are all to familiar with in various cheesy little flyer's that get pushed around. lol
    Kung Fu is good for you.

  4. #49
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    22,250
    Quote Originally Posted by Fei Li View Post
    I was a bit disapointed that he did not mention the modern wushu/traditional developement. It sounds as if everyone in and around Shaolin does Kung Fu like in the
    old times.

    I found it also onteresting that he mentions Wudang but says nothing about martial arts being practised there. So does this mean Wudang has no martial arts tradition?

    Anyway, it is an interesting book, but I feel it could cover more ground.
    Its a book about SHAOLIN, the old traditons and history of Shaolin.
    Psalms 144:1
    Praise be my Lord my Rock,
    He trains my hands for war, my fingers for battle !

  5. #50
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    57
    Hey sanjuro_ronin you read the title!
    I think you misunderstood my post, or I did not understand yours.

  6. #51
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    22,250
    Quote Originally Posted by Fei Li View Post
    Hey sanjuro_ronin you read the title!
    I think you misunderstood my post, or I did not understand yours.
    I was making a point that the book was about Shaolin, not Wudan ( so going into detail about Wudan was not needed) and it was about the history of shaolin and its MA, not the "modern" state of it.
    Psalms 144:1
    Praise be my Lord my Rock,
    He trains my hands for war, my fingers for battle !

  7. #52
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    57
    Quote Originally Posted by sanjuro_ronin View Post
    I was making a point that the book was about Shaolin, not Wudan ( so going into detail about Wudan was not needed) and it was about the history of shaolin and its MA, not the "modern" state of it.
    That is true, but he goes into detail about Emei and the other neighbouring temples that were also not Shaolin.
    I also think that if you write about the history of Shaolin the present is also an important factor, even more when as he divided the story in staff and bare-handed era, so why not mention further developments? I think it is important to conclude such a book with the present situation, this is what I am missing.

  8. #53
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canada!
    Posts
    23,110
    Quote Originally Posted by Fei Li View Post
    That is true, but he goes into detail about Emei and the other neighbouring temples that were also not Shaolin.
    I also think that if you write about the history of Shaolin the present is also an important factor, even more when as he divided the story in staff and bare-handed era, so why not mention further developments? I think it is important to conclude such a book with the present situation, this is what I am missing.
    There is a lot of loosey goosey info about wudang out there.
    probably deserves an investigation of it's own eventually.
    Kung Fu is good for you.

  9. #54
    phenomenal read.

    halfway through.

  10. #55
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    ᏌᏂᎭᎢ, ᏥᎾ
    Posts
    3,257
    anyone know if this book is released in china, and where to find it?

  11. #56
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Whippany NJ, USA
    Posts
    1,552
    Quote Originally Posted by LFJ View Post
    anyone know if this book is released in china, and where to find it?
    Best thing to do is get if from Amazon.com and they can send it there.
    It's a small university press, so I doubt they are doing much exporting.

  12. #57
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Prague, Czech Republic
    Posts
    536
    great book!
    PM

    Practical Hung Kyun 實用洪拳

    www.practicalhungkyun.com

  13. #58
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Calgary, Canada
    Posts
    520
    Quote Originally Posted by NJM View Post
    I was told that this book makes the claim that Shaolin martial arts began with the worship of a Hindu deity named Vashalutherpalshujaj at or some such at the shaolin temple and that Bodhidharma's exercises came later. Any truth to this claim?
    Actually Shahar is not claiming that at all. He is instead claiming that at one point in Shaolin's history, the guardian deity, Vajrapani was used by its monks to sanction their practice of fighting/ combat arts.

    Shahar lists three factors which were important in the early development of Shaolin martial arts: 1st economic - protection of the Monastery's wealth; 2nd strategic - the Monastery's proximity to the Imperial capital and its militarily important location; and the third, which is connected to the 2nd, Imperial sanction of martial arts training at Shaolin.

    He also suggests that in the late Ming and Qing period the function of martial arts at Shaolin shifted from fighting to healing and religious self-cultivation. He further suggests that in this time period, Shaolin drew inspiration and methods from Daoist daoyin gymnastic traditions and turned its interests from weapons to barehand methods .

    r.
    Last edited by r.(shaolin); 05-22-2008 at 08:57 AM.

  14. #59
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canada!
    Posts
    23,110
    Well, I recommend this book as it has some very interesting aspects to it and absolutely tosses a lot of the doubtful stuff that we have all over the net. lol.

    I wonder how this book will effect how people present their shaolin kungfu in the next few years.

    should be interesting to see what pops out ofthis.
    Kung Fu is good for you.

  15. #60
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Calgary, Canada
    Posts
    520
    I'm not convinced, as Shahar suggests, that late Ming hand combat was not created for fighting but were designed for healing and religious self-cultivation and that Shaolin monks turned their attention away from weapons training during the Qing period.


    I would suggest that bare-hand combat was integral and practiced in conjunction with weapon combat at Shaolin from its very beginnings. There is good historical evidence that bare hand combat was integrated and used in combination with hand held weapons particularly sword and short bladed weapons from the earliest times. The techniques of bare-handed close combat were sophisticated effective during the medieval period – well before the Ming dynasty. Unarmed fighting was part-and-parcel of weapons combat. Close bare-hand combat tactics were taught for their relevance to to real combat in all old school Chinese martial arts, either on their own or in conjunction with various weapons. The distinguishing features of pre-modern Shaolin martial arts was the assumption that close quarter tactics could be used and might often prove decisive when fighting with swords, or with staff weapons and that unarmed combat could be effective against an armed assailant. This was the real business of serious fighting where there was no rules and one would need to be prepared to use a foot, head, or knee when fighting at close quarters with weapons. These 'wresting' like tactics were not for sport but were designed to disable, kill an enemy or to deal effectively with an armed adversary in the event of a weapon being dropped or broken. Effectiveness was central to Shaolin as it was with most martial art training even during the Qing Dynasty. Healing and religious self-cultivation, although were important, had their own sets.

    Generally the curriculum of traditional Chinese martial arts systems, including Shaolin, included more weapons training than bare-hand training – that began to change after 1911 during the Republic of China.

    r.
    Last edited by r.(shaolin); 06-05-2008 at 08:45 AM.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •