Although it was a VTM article it was not clear that this was the case, IMO GM Gee was upset because the article could be percieved as showing a general disrespect to the MA community from HFY, which is not the case.
OK, good. That makes sense. It also perhaps betrays from whom the pattern of advertorial statements that could be "percieved as showing a general disrespect to the MA community from HFY" are actually coming from.

While we are all critical of each other's behaviour on here, the fact is that no one posting here is without sin, recent moralising posts to the contrary. Expect to be called out if you post obvious rubbish or pompous, moralistic crap.

I'd prefer that people be themselves, arguments insults or no, rather than as a come across bunch of moralisers and pompous pseudo-Zen airheads. This forum is more like a bar than an academic institution. Nothing wrong with that IMO, if you disagree no one's making you stay.