Co-Inhabitation-Cool Pic

[Black Jack II]

I thought some may find this cool.

Is this evidence of of dinosaurs and co-inhabitation with man in the far off past...maybe a few that somehow survived the ice age and fell off at a later date....or maybe the collective ancestor memory of these creatures put into stone...or maybe just a really good artist.

http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/print/3626

[David Jamieson]

Could very likely be that there are or were smallish remnant of saurians around right up to and following the ice age end...which we are still in the middle of apparently.

anyway, I am surprised that article didn't mention anything about Ica or the Ica stones. I mean, there are a lot of representations of saurians in ancient art. A surprising amount.

[fopah]

there is actually a second page that goes into detail about the ica stones. at the end of the article it says "to be continued". click... and magically a new page emerges.

[RD'S Alias - 1A]

This means man is alot older than we thought, OR dinos didn't all die suddenly 65 million years ago.

[MasterKiller]

This means man is alot older than we thought, OR dinos didn't all die suddenly 65 million years ago.

Of course they didn't all die. Their decedents still exist, even as tasty nuggets in Happy Meals.

I'm sure the Jesus nuts will try to use these as proof the world is only 6,000 years old, though.

[diego]

I thought some may find this cool.

Is this evidence of of dinosaurs and co-inhabitation with man in the far off past...maybe a few that somehow survived the ice age and fell off at a later date....or maybe the collective ancestor memory of these creatures put into stone...or maybe just a really good artist.

http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/print/3626

pretty cool

[MasterKiller]

Look at the source.

http://www.apologeticspress.org/

A nutty X-tian web magazine aimed at nutty x-tian fundamentalists.

[David Jamieson]

yes, well I'm pretty sure they didn't manufacture the artifacts and Im sure they will find some sort of agenda in them, but nevertheless, there they are. Pretty neat.

[MasterKiller]

yes, well I'm pretty sure they didn't manufacture the artifacts and Im sure they will find some sort of agenda in them, but nevertheless, there they are. Pretty neat.

http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/3656

[Lucas]

the science of "dating" is not that old. apparently, as it is constantly being changed and disputed, its not that accurate either.

that old term from grade school comes reeling back to the forefront of my mind on this one:

"estimated and or educated guesses."

[Lucas]

although those Cambodian ruinous carvings are **** awesome.

[David Jamieson]

The temple carving could also be a prank from restoration people like the spaceman on the medieval church that was put here by a restoration crew. It is possible.

see:
medeival spaceman! lol

[Yao Sing]

the science of "dating" is not that old. apparently

Check with RD on that, he's the resident "dating" expert.

[Oso]

http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/3656

those ****ers are scary.


.308

[golden arhat]

isnt it possible that dinosaur remains werent as heavily buried during the ice age as they are today ?

surely a couple of thousand years backward and there would be a whole lot of fossils would be much more apparent just because nature hasnt covered them up to the extent they are today

i'm sure cavemen may have come to the same conclusions regarding dinosaurs as we have


or thought they were magical creatures from long past and worshipped them as such