Results 1 to 15 of 22

Thread: Traditional weapons questions

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    San Diego, CA.
    Posts
    1,162

    Traditional weapons questions

    In my brief stint in Choy Lee Fut, I asked one my instructors about the small rings attached to top side of chinese sword...he stated that they were used to entangle an opponents weapon. But how? The rings are pretty small and it would be hard to imagine what might get caught in there...can someone shed some light on that for me?

    My second question is in regards to chinese archery and TCM...are there any styles that incorporate bow and arrow training? If not why? Is it a cost issue or where there restrictions imposed on the the people that only allowed for archery to be praticed by the military? It seems that some of the Korean and Japanese arts include archery as part of their curriculum.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    桃花岛
    Posts
    5,031
    Do you mean the rings on the 9 Ring broadsword? AFAIK those were decorative.
    Simon McNeil
    ___________________________________________

    Be on the lookout for the Black Trillium, a post-apocalyptic wuxia novel released by Brain Lag Publishing available in all major online booksellers now.
    Visit me at Simon McNeil - the Blog for thoughts on books and stuff.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Midgard
    Posts
    10,852
    I always thought the rings were also there for the added weight. easier to chop through leather/bamboo armor and bone.

    however if you were to lock blades withsomeone, and were to have rings, I could see how the blade would be stopped from reaching your guard. keep in mind you would have to reverse your blade though, which I dont think I would want to do.
    For whoso comes amongst many shall one day find that no one man is by so far the mightiest of all.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    San Diego, CA.
    Posts
    1,162
    Quote Originally Posted by Lucas View Post
    I always thought the rings were also there for the added weight. easier to chop through leather/bamboo armor and bone.
    If thats true, why not just use a heavier or thicker blade? The rings rattle, make noise, you would think that they aren't the most stealthy of items to bring into battle. Or is that their appeal/function...cause fear or to help locate someone in battle?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,349
    1) added weight as already mention, to help chop through light armor and bone.
    2) to blunt the other guys sword, not to tangle it with. In many forms there is a move where you encirle the sword (with the point pointing downward) around your body and then slash. The encircling is blocking with the blunt end of the sword, coming around and then slashing to the neck or ribs or any limbs that get in the way.

    That's at least the application I learned in both my former Eagle Claw school and the current Long Fist school that I am now. 2 different northern schools yet same application and concept, there must be something to it.
    Master of Shaolin I-Ching Bu Ti, GunGoPow and I Hung Wei Lo styles.

    I am seeking sparring partner. Any level. Looking for blondes or redhead. 5'2" to 5'9". Between 115-135 weight class. Females between 17-30 only need apply. Will extensively work on grappling.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Huntington, NY, USA website: TenTigers.com
    Posts
    7,718
    ok, just how blunt do you need to make a sword before it won't harm you? Anyone who has ever handled a blade, be it a broadsword or a kitchen knife knows that a dull knife will cut you.
    As far as entangling a weapon in the rings? Great. Now You're stuck as well.
    And how exactly will a weapon get tangled? Even if it was the hairs on a spear, you would have to wrap and wind it many times to entangle it-unless the tip of the spear got caught right inside one of those little rings...remember-this is all going on in the heat of battle.
    you see how silly this sounds?

    Ok, here's what I heard, tell me if it sounds at least a bit probable:
    There were large cadres of soldiers, such as the Big Sword Group. and they carried..um, big swords. So as these batttalions approached, their rings would make all this clamour, just as the American helicopters playing Vagner's Flight of the Valkyries in Apocalypse Now, as they launched their attack. It had a psychological effect on the enemy.

    Now, the earrings on the Monk's Spade, the pom-poms on the Kuan-dao?
    I think that was just good fashion sense. You need to accessorize!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    1,653
    One thousand soldiers with one thousand nine ring broadswords sound like Ten thousand soldiers. When dealing with formations of troops stealth is not an issue. Better then to be feared. It was common practice for armies to make alot of noise, marching in step, banging of shields, drums and horns, etc.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8h5wHsWkFts

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9PG0RnlvzmY
    - 三和拳

    "Civilize the mind but make savage the body" Mao Tse Tsung

    "You're certainly intelligent enough to know how to be a good person without the lead weights of religious dogma." Serpent

    "There is no evidence that the zombie progeny of an incestuous space ghost cares what people do." MasterKiller

    "If there isn't a chance that you're going to lose in a fight, then you're not fighting tough enough competition." ShaolinTiger00

    BLOG
    MYSPACE
    FACEBOOK
    YOUTUBE

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    local
    Posts
    4,200
    Quote Originally Posted by SimonM View Post
    AFAIK those were decorative.
    don't you research anything?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    San Diego, CA.
    Posts
    1,162
    Quote Originally Posted by SimonM View Post
    Do you mean the rings on the 9 Ring broadsword? AFAIK those were decorative.
    Yes...decorative? You mean like a nose ring? Are you sure about that?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    桃花岛
    Posts
    5,031
    I've heard the weapon entangling theory. It doesn't hold water.
    As for the added weight argument... it's slightly less unlikely but it's a bit impractical.

    Now the 9 ring was originally an executioner's weapon. As such it's use was frequently ceremonial. Ceremonial weapons frequent gain adornments that are largely there just because.
    Simon McNeil
    ___________________________________________

    Be on the lookout for the Black Trillium, a post-apocalyptic wuxia novel released by Brain Lag Publishing available in all major online booksellers now.
    Visit me at Simon McNeil - the Blog for thoughts on books and stuff.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •