Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 22

Thread: Capoeira questions

  1. #1

    Capoeira questions

    Do you think Capoeira can be taught, learned, and utilized as an effective martial art?

    I know it is usually not practiced as a fully combative style.
    I know it is more of a flower style than a truly practical style.
    But, I have heard many claims that, if used properly, it can indeed stand toe to toe with the more pragmatic and combat-based styles.

    Thoughts?
    What do you call someone who practices Dim Mak on themselves?
    Dum Fuk!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    IL
    Posts
    998
    There is no such art that is all encompassing but you have to look at the toughness and conditioning of the practitioner.
    Why do you think the Brazilians have such a good reputation?
    They have capoeira as a base art and with their toughness and BJJ conditioning and exposure, they make an excellent combination.
    Capoeira is not for everyone but you have to have 'sinewy strength' to be able to see and appreciate its great benefits! Yes, capoeira is as effective as any other art. IS it better? No. You like apples and I like grapefruit! Is one better than the other. No. Each chooses what is to their liking!

  3. #3
    I'm aware that there isn't a distinction between styles as far as "better" or "worse", but I'm wondering if Capoeira can be used in a practical manner outside of a hora (circle).
    From what little experience I've had in it, capoeira seems to have little close range defense, ground work, or hand techniques.
    Yes, the training and conditioning are valuable, but do the theories of movement and the specific techniques have real value in a fight if not combined with other types of MA?
    What do you call someone who practices Dim Mak on themselves?
    Dum Fuk!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    IL
    Posts
    998
    Quote Originally Posted by Chazmek View Post
    I'm aware that there isn't a distinction between styles as far as "better" or "worse", but I'm wondering if Capoeira can be used in a practical manner outside of a hora (circle).
    From what little experience I've had in it, capoeira seems to have little close range defense, ground work, or hand techniques.
    Yes, the training and conditioning are valuable, but do the theories of movement and the specific techniques have real value in a fight if not combined with other types of MA?
    Based on my own xperience, a 'pure' art does not exist!
    What that means is that you adapt a base art (capoeira) to a functional body of work (i.e. BJJ-concept, principles applications) and you have strong fighters who can hold their own against anyone. Again, I am not talking about invincibility!
    BJJ is actually the root newaza that was seen by the Brazilians (or at least Maeda in Brazil) as a 'finsihing touch' to an oppponent grounded by the kick.

    My use of the definition 'better' is in function and adaptability! Just like a judo or jujitsu practitioner is more likely to be better in the long run than someone who does form/kata/taolu for the same period of time and imagines himself to be invincible! I do not discount theory but it only serves a beginners mind. You must have the conditioning followed by the muscle memory of the art grounded in periodization principles. Theory can even come after the conditioning is completed! That is one reason I tend to discount sport karate or sport taekwondo because it has a short term subjctive benefit when taken in its small zone of what we call sport. All sport is good so I am not discounting its excellent benefits.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Behind you!
    Posts
    6,163
    Quote Originally Posted by mawali View Post
    There is no such art that is all encompassing but you have to look at the toughness and conditioning of the practitioner.
    Why do you think the Brazilians have such a good reputation?
    They have capoeira as a base art and with their toughness and BJJ conditioning and exposure, they make an excellent combination.
    'They' do do 'they'? How many Brazilians do capoeira? And of those, how many also do BJJ? And of those how many compete seriously? And of those how many win frequently?

    There are ways of judging an art's efficiency: baseless statements are not one of them.

    How are you defining a base art here? What makes capoeira a base art?

    Capoeira is not for everyone but you have to have 'sinewy strength' to be able to see and appreciate its great benefits!
    And what do you mean by this? I have friends who are good capoeiristas and have played about a bit myself... I dont have that sinewy strength especially - does that mean I can't appreciate what they are doing?!

    Yes, capoeira is as effective as any other art. IS it better? No. You like apples and I like grapefruit! Is one better than the other. No. Each chooses what is to their liking!
    Apart from the truism that it isn't the art it's the person... well, that's not entirely accurate. Is ballet an effective martial art if the person doing it is well conditioned and aggressive? A lot of capoeira has a lot of
    problems as SD.

    One more question: do you practise capoeira or BJJ?
    its safe to say that I train some martial arts. Im not that good really, but most people really suck, so I feel ok about that - Sunfist

    Sometime blog on training esp in Japan

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Behind you!
    Posts
    6,163
    Quote Originally Posted by Chazmek View Post
    Do you think Capoeira can be taught, learned, and utilized as an effective martial art?

    I know it is usually not practiced as a fully combative style.
    I know it is more of a flower style than a truly practical style.
    But, I have heard many claims that, if used properly, it can indeed stand toe to toe with the more pragmatic and combat-based styles.

    Thoughts?
    There are more fighting based styles of capoeira and there are less. I think it's angola that's the more combatitive. The conditioning, the breaking rhythms, the odd angles of attack, and some extremely devastating techs should be useful. Whether the basic principles or mindset for good SD is there or not I don't know.
    its safe to say that I train some martial arts. Im not that good really, but most people really suck, so I feel ok about that - Sunfist

    Sometime blog on training esp in Japan

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    IL
    Posts
    998
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr Punch View Post
    'They' do do 'they'? How many Brazilians do capoeira? And of those, how many also do BJJ? And of those how many compete seriously? And of those how many win frequently?

    There are ways of judging an art's efficiency: baseless statements are not one of them.

    How are you defining a base art here? What makes capoeira a base art?

    And what do you mean by this? I have friends who are good capoeiristas and have played about a bit myself... I dont have that sinewy strength especially - does that mean I can't appreciate what they are doing?!

    Apart from the truism that it isn't the art it's the person... well, that's not entirely accurate. Is ballet an effective martial art if the person doing it is well conditioned and aggressive? A lot of capoeira has a lot of
    problems as SD.

    One more question: do you practise capoeira or BJJ?
    1. In Brazil, capoeira may be considered a base art. It is the root of Brazilian struggle against oppression. Brazilians are tough nonetheless and those who have opportunity do study other arts (Japanese or otherwise) to round out their expertise and the Gracie brand of BJJ (newaza) turned out to be the better of them all. As noted, my preference is for the word 'better".

    2. I know nothing about ballet so you got me there!
    I can say with authority that ballet has never been martial so I am confused why you would assume that one who is well conditioned and aggressive would make a great martial artist who does ballet for entertainment or a living.

    3. It is always the individual in most cases who determines the skill as opposed to blanket statements without a knowledge of some kind (basic, intermediate or advanced). Shenfa and jibengong per CMA is what determines outcome. If you do taolu only there is no way under heaven or hell you can equal someone who actually grapples, does vigorous training and applications.

    4. Any sensible capoeirista (I am sure) will be able to recognize the inherent weaknesses of their and for those who competes know that Gracie BJJ and exposure is a great equalizer. I ma not saying Gracie BJJ is 'all that' but their dedication far surpassed those who rely on fancy pajama like movements and qi to mesmerize their opponents.
    One need not take the whole BJJ curriculum of Gracie BJJ but using some of its tools as evidenced by the many (or few, depending on how you see it) NCAA wrestlers who took up BJJ (mainly) or shuaijiao and demolished their opponents.

    5. There is something to learn from anyone or anything so I have respect for any art that the individual finds he can live long and prosper. I really do not believe or practice martial arts affiliation theology but I do see where some arts have functional utility (BJJ, Judo, Jiujitsu, shuaijiao) than others (wushu, taolu, etc)

    I love wushu because I can never be that acrobatic and I find the airwork similar to one of my favourite visual representations of classical ballet! I love wushu performance art and it is breathtaking but I cannot use it! I do enjoy it despite my ability to do most of the aerial routine though when I was yourner I was able to do many of the TKD aerial kicks and now my belly is so big I cannot even balance an egg.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    22,250
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr Punch View Post
    There are more fighting based styles of capoeira and there are less. I think it's angola that's the more combatitive. The conditioning, the breaking rhythms, the odd angles of attack, and some extremely devastating techs should be useful. Whether the basic principles or mindset for good SD is there or not I don't know.
    I think you are correct, I recall learning that Capoeira had two main "branches" one that became more "flashy" and "dance-like" and the other that retained its unorthodox but highly effective martial applications.
    I think that Discovery series "Deadly Arts" with that female Aikidoka from Quebec showed these two systems.
    Psalms 144:1
    Praise be my Lord my Rock,
    He trains my hands for war, my fingers for battle !

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    IL
    Posts
    998
    There are more fighting based styles of capoeira and there are less. I think it's angola that's the more combatitive. The conditioning, the breaking rhythms, the odd angles of attack, and some extremely devastating techs should be useful. Whether the basic principles or mindset for good SD is there or not I don't know.
    From my limited knowledge of capoeira, it was more than just fighting. As a matter of fact, it was a response to brutality and a call for freedom coupled with a 'native' art that offered protection and solace, so my view is initially spiritual and philosophical.
    Capoeira changed from a street art practiced by non-Europeans (those of African, indigenous tribes-they had a similar art) and those of mixed ancestry and due to immigration and new blood, it changed/evolved where it was banned because unarmed thugs often shamed those with swords and larger weapons.

    More exposure caused capoeira to be initiated as part of a physical education or military self defense (sound familiar! Jingwu as public martial arts instruction becoming part of PE curriculum) and application added/combined with Asian MA to make it palatable to the larger population.
    Many of the more outward movements immitated wushu (for the record), was very showy but lacked discipline in the physical world regarding self conduct.
    Those masters who went forward for greater integration of capoeira as part of PE were considered 'sellouts' in some circles.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Reno, Nv, USA
    Posts
    2,833
    knives and trickery, good stuff!

    strike!

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Behind you!
    Posts
    6,163
    Mawali, are you saying capoiera is part of a national PE curriculum in schools in Brazil? If not, what percentage of schools teach it as such?
    its safe to say that I train some martial arts. Im not that good really, but most people really suck, so I feel ok about that - Sunfist

    Sometime blog on training esp in Japan

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Behind you!
    Posts
    6,163
    BTW, according to wiki, I was wrong: capoeira angola is the dancier one and capoeira regional is the more effectiveness-orientated one.
    its safe to say that I train some martial arts. Im not that good really, but most people really suck, so I feel ok about that - Sunfist

    Sometime blog on training esp in Japan

  13. #13
    if you train capoeira as it is typically trained, you will develop certain attributes that come in handy in fighting (flexibility, speed, endurance, strength), but you will lack other skills such as hitting with contact against pads / bags (again, I say typically - there may be capoeira schools that train against bags, I don't know), and the way in which they "spar" is pretty much devoid of the the principles of a "real" fight, as it is more of a flow drill without contact;

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    IL
    Posts
    998
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr Punch View Post
    Mawali, are you saying capoiera is part of a national PE curriculum in schools in Brazil? If not, what percentage of schools teach it as such?
    PE only means it was de-clawed from its street origin to match the Gymnasium or liceo Western European tradition of learning. Public consumption as sport became part of its resurrection. Check it out! Mass media taking excerpts and it comes off as a type of break dancing.
    Capeoira angola is the base! All others are version. capoeira angola is "more traditional', more laid back, more philosophical everything appears so ineffective that when you meet a good angleiro, you wake up with stars!

    All the others styles want to exhibit dominance, hegemony, which is more powerful, more this and that and they resort to upmanship to match the West European model/style of educaional methodology and pedagogy.

    Just like wushu, more people seem more aware about capoeira as gymnastics!
    Good or bad, let each chose their way

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Midgard
    Posts
    10,852
    For whoso comes amongst many shall one day find that no one man is by so far the mightiest of all.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •