Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 37

Thread: Could and Should the Mook Jong be Updated?

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    22,250
    In the end what you find is that there is really no substitute for training with a live resisting partner.
    That's just it, it is NOT supposed to, just like a HB isn't supposed to either.
    But it is suppose to be an aid for solo training VS a live opponent.
    Now, you obviously can't train combative foot work on it, or counters, but what you can train is HOW to ATTACK a "presented form".
    Psalms 144:1
    Praise be my Lord my Rock,
    He trains my hands for war, my fingers for battle !

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    2,228
    Quote Originally Posted by sanjuro_ronin View Post
    That's just it, it is NOT supposed to, just like a HB isn't supposed to either.
    But it is suppose to be an aid for solo training VS a live opponent.
    Now, you obviously can't train combative foot work on it, or counters, but what you can train is HOW to ATTACK a "presented form".
    Agreed and the WD offers forms in all zones..along with "stiff resistance" the ability to resist energy, feed it back, etc..

    One of the complaints you'll here is that during ChiSao the partner will become stiff and non-compliant.. The dummy is as stiff as it gets.. (no jokes please ) Forcing you to move and adapt via movement and change..

    I think it is fine for what it is... BUT as I said you will get more out of a live resisting partner. The WD and other drills are what I and some others call "perfection work" and I think it is fine for what it is.
    Jim Hawkins
    M Y V T K F
    "You should have kicked him in the ball_..."—Sifu

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    right there
    Posts
    3,216
    this is a interesting and funny bit on william cheung and the dummy

    "years later in 1973 i started teaching and on one of my trips back to hong kong at the end of the decade i haeard someone had made a supposed mechanical wooden dummy. It supposedly moved at three speeds, slow, medium, and fast. I asked Wong Shung Leung if it was true and he confimred it> the man who built it apparenly had studied with oen of yip's students and was quite an engineer.

    So i went with koo to have alook the man lived in a 600 square foot apartment on the third floor. I said i'd heard about this mechanical wooden dummy, He said that he has spent three years building it and it worked very well.When i asked him where it was he pointed down a corridor toward a sliding door. I walked over and opended the door.The man said that the dummy was next to the toilet andi shoudl walk in and close the door behind me.

    I stepped in and the dummy came to life throwing punches and kicks. I fell onto the toilet and tried blocking attacks but they were too fast. It hit me me in the groin,at which point i heard the engineer yell "sibak, do you want me to make it go faster!?"

    "No!" i shouted "make it go slower! make it stop!" it hurt but it as funny.

    His mechanical wooden dummy proved less thanm spectacular when it came to training never the less i cant help but think that if one were to use modern computerizd sensors and a remote control it might be possible to build a dummy that could track your position position and launch realistic attacks that foced you use to footwork and proper technique.


    this would be an interesting way to take the wooden dummy to a new stage

    I am pork boy, the breakfast monkey.

    left leg: mild bruising. right leg: charley horse

    handsomerest member of KFM forum hands down

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    New York, NY, USA
    Posts
    660
    Do you know what you have after you upgrade and improve a dummy? A dummy.
    When you control the hands and feet, there are no secrets.
    http://www.Moyyat.com

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    North London, England
    Posts
    3,003
    Quote Originally Posted by Tom Kagan View Post
    Do you know what you have after you upgrade and improve a dummy? A dummy.
    Should you update the wooden man? Do what you like but remember it's wood for a reason. Has it's 3 arms and leg for a reason. Is called a wooden man (not dummy!) for a reason!

    I wouldn't say padding it up is an upgrade, as that's what your 3 section wall bag can (or should!) be used for.

    Spinning, springing and even floating blooming bodies are just variations to the frame to be honest, and most experiements were probably already done before the final product was born by Ip Man. It's fixed for a reason!

    So, in short, why upgrade something that already has it's purpose and is serving it very well indeed. If only for the lucky people who have been taught well...
    Ti Fei
    詠春國術

  6. #21
    Quote Originally Posted by Tom Kagan View Post
    Do you know what you have after you upgrade and improve a dummy? A dummy.
    ***Actually, there's a number of dummies around here, and I can think of at least two who know basically nothing about the muk yan jong.

  7. #22
    You can feel guys who have been working on the dummy, they get sharper actions, sudden, short sharp juts...

    to further develop jum and tan dual energy striking with the ballistic element each has, added from dummy training. By using the angles and rigidity of the arms we can move and strike across the dummy arms as we use toi ma, side shuffling steps, pivoting...iow, footwork coupled with striking drills.


    We use a high jum strike using the inside forearm against the dummy arm as we strike towards the dummy's 'head , instead of a high gaun sao that many seem to have adopted. The idea for this is to further re-enforce the dual strike/deflection from dan chi-sao, as you aim to strike while using alignment to be aimed at a persons head. Not a singular lateral force of gaun sao coupled with a low gaun sao too...iow 2 defensive actions ! ....the jum strike leads to a cycle from the high jum then becoming a bong ballistic energy , developing the displacing slapping force on the low arm, while the previous defensive action of low gaun sao returns to striking tan elbow alignment...the tan using the outside of the forearm while striking forwards. The tans elbow being kept low and inwards as SLT...
    iow one arm is always striking directly, either in duality of energy or coupled with a fully committed defensive arm action ..ie low gaun sao...

    cycling arms attacking...coupled with short sharp burst of focused alignment.

    Our primary attacking actions involve a jut from tan or a pak from jum , relying on which is leading relative to the opponents leading arm and your tactical positions....

    these are developed further from basic levels into sharper repeated workouts on the dummy , rigid arms offer the required resistance for the actions. We adopt angles but use the same facing techniques , so we move along the dummy and cycle or angle in and attack etc...things we cant do with a partner , ask them to offer 'iron bar' arms for workouts repeatedly for us....

    Obviously the preceding tactical scenarios require 100's of hours of chi-sao to ingrain intuitive reactions to our relative positions...etc...ie what leading tan side comes into us from left or right, what side we counter angle to....in drills using seung ma, toi ma, shuffle steps , pivoting...all used in sparring.

    We also utilize the momentum of the body in motion to coincide with the actions of the arms so we harness the body mass in movement as we strike/deflect across the face , as if we are cuttin gthe way, or cutting off the ring ...We learn to also use the momentum of body mass in motion against the opponents, so if it isnt doen correctly we can easily capitalize on mistakes made.

    impo the issues mma guys will have is they are trying to equate abstract dummy actions into functional 'moves' like KATA. It wont happen and leads to vt kickboxing because the moves are way to slow , over using arms for countering simple punches etc...

    If we are developing into attackers, why spend so much time doing redundant arm moves for a simply punch the opponent throws ? iow why do kwan sao...why use a bong AND a tan to block a guys punch, like overkill... no wonder some vt gets its butt handed to it if this is the idea being touted.


    you cant copy VT from seeing it in youtubes, never mind understand whats being developed. Like you cant see bjj guys lying on you with body weight until you feel it being done ...not all apparent.

    A lot of VT is passed down without deep understanding of the fundamentals, so it leads to what it is now ...
    Last edited by k gledhill; 05-09-2010 at 09:07 AM.

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,519
    I think Yung Chun is right. The dummy is not meant to similate fighting at all. It is like Sil Lim in that it is designed to teach center line theory. Sil Lim teaches not only the hand techniques and stance, but also gives reference to center and teaches you to apply your techniques on center. The dummy then allows you to apply this theory while using footwork. It is a way of applying it to a resisting opponent as such without causing injury to either opponent or yourself, but still does not similate fighting as such. This is just learning, just as in the other hand forms. It is learning in a learning environment. You spar with resisting opponents only to train what you have learned while in your learning environment. You can not learn while fighting. If it is really fighting you will not have time to learn much. You just apply what you have learned while in your learning environment. The only thing you achieve in a fight is to practice what you have learned earlier. Otherwise all you get out of it is a flat face and ears that look like vegetables.

  9. #24
    The system can seem abstract if you dont know what your developing.

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    North London, England
    Posts
    3,003
    Quote Originally Posted by k gledhill View Post
    The system can seem abstract if you dont know what your developing.
    Again you say what I am thinking! The wooden man does require a training purpose beyond what the 108/116 shows us. As do the forms and weaponry drills.

    There are stories of one of Lee Shings more famous students, Joseph Cheng, who was heard by some of his students training on the wooden man, and rather than the 'clonk clonk' sound they were used to hearing from the form, they heard a sound like a machine gun. Continuouse and unwielding.

    FME When you 'fill-in' the pictures in books (with your knowledge of the wing chun 'seed'), this is what you hear. And this should be what you strive for in wooden man practise.

    My opinion of course!
    Ti Fei
    詠春國術

  11. #26
    Quote Originally Posted by LoneTiger108 View Post
    Again you say what I am thinking! The wooden man does require a training purpose beyond what the 108/116 shows us. As do the forms and weaponry drills.

    There are stories of one of Lee Shings more famous students, Joseph Cheng, who was heard by some of his students training on the wooden man, and rather than the 'clonk clonk' sound they were used to hearing from the form, they heard a sound like a machine gun. Continuouse and unwielding.

    FME When you 'fill-in' the pictures in books (with your knowledge of the wing chun 'seed'), this is what you hear. And this should be what you strive for in wooden man practise.

    My opinion of course!
    no offence but you cant tell by the sound , you have to FFFEEEEELLL you can be very soft and relaxed as long as your working the idea.

  12. #27
    Quote Originally Posted by Knifefighter View Post
    Which is exactly one of the various reasons why it doesn't translate to combat against another human being.
    Just because you have less imagination than a 2 day old newt, doesn't mean that the world suffers from the same problems.
    The opportunity to secure ourselves against defeat lies in our own hands, but the opportunity of defeating the enemy is provided by the enemy himself.
    -sun tzu

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    North London, England
    Posts
    3,003
    Quote Originally Posted by k gledhill View Post
    no offence but you cant tell by the sound , you have to FFFEEEEELLL you can be very soft and relaxed as long as your working the idea.
    Ok I understand that we can train many soft ideals too on the wooden man, but c'mon! The wood don't hit back! So give it some welly and prep those tendons, muscles and bones...
    Ti Fei
    詠春國術

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Kent, UK
    Posts
    459
    Quote Originally Posted by Knifefighter View Post
    Which is exactly one of the various reasons why it doesn't translate to combat against another human being.
    granted, to a degree. although...

    boxers use a heavy bag, karateka use a makiwara, grapplers often use a heavy bag/dummy of sorts

    its just a training instrument, nothingmore or less

    Quote Originally Posted by Spencer View Post
    There are stories of one of Lee Shings more famous students, Joseph Cheng, who was heard by some of his students training on the wooden man, and rather than the 'clonk clonk' sound they were used to hearing from the form, they heard a sound like a machine gun. Continuouse and unwielding.
    dummy, and parking meters...
    Last edited by LSWCTN1; 05-10-2010 at 03:01 AM. Reason: missed a bit!

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    North London, England
    Posts
    3,003
    Quote Originally Posted by LSWCTN1 View Post
    dummy, and parking meters...
    Well, you may be able to share some more stories like this about Uncle Cheng!

    I heard about those darned parking meters Guess thats what you get when your arms are 'as wood'
    Ti Fei
    詠春國術

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •