Originally Posted by
taai gihk yahn
this phrase is typical of the non-sense mindset that has been erroneously propagated in this country vis-a-vis martial arts, which is that for some strange reason, despite the fact that many people on this planet can successfully learn a vast array of disparate skill sets, for some reason when it comes to TMA (specifically Asian TMA), all of a sudden someone's capacity to learn more than one art / skill set is no longer considered possible or desireable;
personally, I see it as a sort of elitist snobbism on the part of TMA practitioners, or is used as a rationalization as to why they are correct to remain "faithful" to one art / skill set;
let's face it folks - a lot of that one-art-forever silliness is grounded in the cultural norms of CHina, Japan, Korea, where loyalty to one's family / sifu were paramount - thus, to (openly) go and study with more than one person was pretty much taboo, so u necesarilly stuck it out with what you had; OTOH, many TCMA-ists did travel extensively and picked up a lot of things from a lot of different peopl...
so here's a question: who's criteria do we apply to decided if a person is a Jack-of-all-trades? and what if he is, but can put all of what he learned into effective usage? this phrase should be eliminated, as it demonstrates an outmoded form of bias that does nothing to further any art; fighting effectively means that one needs must be skilled at kicking, punching, clinching, throwing, grappling, ground fighting and probably weapons as well; in fact, if you look at European HTH combat arts, u would see that they involved all of this - and people seemed well able to engage in disparate skill sets without too much difficulty; so to jump in w/the Jack of all trades "argument", it is a weak argument at this stage in the game;
really, people throw this phrase around with no real basis for substantiating it;