Results 1 to 15 of 129

Thread: body structure and hitting hard

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    193

    body structure and hitting hard

    When I used to do wing chun I used to be rubbish at the "stance test" i.e having someone push you in the chest or on an extended punch whilst standing the stance.

    My training partner was very good at this but when it came to punching his power was significantly weaker than mine(we are the same size)
    What was he doing wrong?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    4,381
    static posture has little to do with dynamic, and being able to recieve force is not the same as being able to deliver it

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    22,250
    Quote Originally Posted by Frost View Post
    static posture has little to do with dynamic, and being able to recieve force is not the same as being able to deliver it
    Correct.
    Static tests and stances have very little to do with dynamic movements.
    Psalms 144:1
    Praise be my Lord my Rock,
    He trains my hands for war, my fingers for battle !

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    1,355
    I see that as a variation of my test# 1...

    But the key in my structure tests is that none of them are truly static. They all involve movement.

    And I fully agree, he probably needed to focus more and hit the pads and shields more. Perhaps he was not aiming through the target pad?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    22,250
    Quote Originally Posted by chusauli View Post
    I see that as a variation of my test# 1...

    But the key in my structure tests is that none of them are truly static. They all involve movement.

    And I fully agree, he probably needed to focus more and hit the pads and shields more. Perhaps he was not aiming through the target pad?
    From what I gather from your DVD, that test is a fluid and dynamic one, the person being "pressed upon" is suppose the "redirect" the energy, but maintain structure and if that means "rotating or shifting axis" you do it, right?
    Psalms 144:1
    Praise be my Lord my Rock,
    He trains my hands for war, my fingers for battle !

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    1,355
    Quote Originally Posted by sanjuro_ronin View Post
    From what I gather from your DVD, that test is a fluid and dynamic one, the person being "pressed upon" is suppose the "redirect" the energy, but maintain structure and if that means "rotating or shifting axis" you do it, right?
    No shifting of axis horizontally left or right, but shift of axis vertically with pelvis up or down...

    ...and not necessarily redirecting, but equalizing.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    St. Louis, MO USA
    Posts
    5,316
    Quote Originally Posted by IRONMONK View Post
    When I used to do wing chun I used to be rubbish at the "stance test" i.e having someone push you in the chest or on an extended punch whilst standing the stance.

    My training partner was very good at this but when it came to punching his power was significantly weaker than mine(we are the same size)
    What was he doing wrong?
    The "stance test" is just a very basic way of testing your ability to "receive" pressure.

    I can not say why your punch is more powerful without seeing what you both are doing.

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by IRONMONK View Post
    When I used to do wing chun I used to be rubbish at the "stance test" i.e having someone push you in the chest or on an extended punch whilst standing the stance.

    My training partner was very good at this but when it came to punching his power was significantly weaker than mine(we are the same size)
    What was he doing wrong?

    There is nothing wrong, it is just the different between one is better then other in producing an outward resultant force and the other one is better in produce a partial equilibrium.

    Everything is clear under the six directional force vectors analysis.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •