
Originally Posted by
taichi4eva
In your opinion what are the major differences between Hop Gar and White Crane?
Also, Ku Chi Wai's group says that Ng Yim Ming focused mainly on the 28 stars, a form consisting of seed tickets that could be taken apart and parsed together. Were you also taught a version of this form?
No real differences that I can see in the functional area. There are so many lineages of both that there could be as much difference between two Hop Ga schools as between Hop Ga and White Crane. In the past the names were somewhat interchangeable. Wong Yen Lam taught into old age and taught his later students differently as his eyesight failed. I suspect that Wong Yen Lam and Wong Lam Hoi did not think of their arts as being different. Ng Siu Jung's White Crane expanded with the success of his schools and developed more flavors from other systems but it did not change its essence as a "Lama style."
Compared to most TWC schools Hop Ga is pared down and does not stress a vast array of weapons. I also have a feeling that Hop Ga remains a bodyguard style in that it does not emphasize self defense. It is about taking someone out with little regard to personal safety. White Crane has expanded to the point that it is actually a little harder to define as a style.
I don't know anything about the 28 stars. Folks who know better than I have said that Ku Chi Wai learned for only a brief period (weeks, not months) and that Ng was reluctant to teach him. Personally, I have only seen a couple of videos showing his style and I can say that the footwork is definitely not Hop Ga style.
"Look, I'm only doing me job. I have to show you how to defend yourself against fresh fruit."
For it breeds great perfection, if the practise be harder then the use. Sir Francis Bacon
the world has a surplus of self centered sh1twh0res, so anyone who extends compassion to a stranger with sincerity is alright in my book. also people who fondle road kill. those guys is ok too. GunnedDownAtrocity