Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 46 to 47 of 47

Thread: For those styles that emphasize the centre line (and bridging)

  1. #46
    a lot of people are thinking about your and the opponent's centerline

    you may make your center line disappear by using your one side to face the opponent

    some of the real WC theory is actually about occupation of the center route/road

    WC want to take up the road to the opponent's center line, qu zhong lu

    Ba gua, on the other hand is to walk away to the side but approach the centerline from the side

    xie chu zhen ru.

    tai chi is about circling with forearms and controlling the opponent's arms

    may take up the center of the opponent's position, but not necessarily strike the center line

    ---

  2. #47
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    1,002
    As I learned in my hung training, bridging covers situations and ranges from the intangible (feints/ghost bridging), all the way into the clinch (the bread and butter of many of our bridge methods takes place while disrupting the structure of a clinching opponent for example).

    Perhaps the issue is not with the arts, but with the "teachers" that are not fighters teaching people how to fight. In my view that is unethical, but I don't speak for anyone except for myself.
    Last edited by Golden Arms; 11-12-2010 at 10:16 AM.
    -Golden Arms-

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •