Training and conditioning any technique is easy, bag work, dummy work and so forth.
What you are truly asking is how does one test those skills?
We can grab the iron bag as much as we want and close the captn's of crush as many times as we can but that doesn't equal being able to crush a throat does it?
Well, yeah it kind of does, technically, bu not intent-wise and I guess that is the point.
If I can crush 3" of concrete slab with a knife hand I have the speed and power and conditioning to do it to someone's neck or throat or ribs, BUT CAN I do it?
Goes back to what I said earlier.
If you can fight with your "hands ties behind your back" you can fight with them not tied.
Psalms 144:1
Praise be my Lord my Rock,
He trains my hands for war, my fingers for battle !
teh deadly.
i do believe it is important for realistic martial artists to think about this.
break down, how i see it. technique, application, effect, usage.
if i go backwards. you learn to use the technique under resistant pressure by applying standard similar techniques in a free fighting format. you can test the effects of your techniques through various means using training equipment, controlled application or even, depending on how serious you are, you can apply some techniques to dead animal flesh. as for application and technique, teaching these follows the same guidelines you use to teach anything in MA.
its the usage and effect people wonder most about. once you get to the point where you feel you are confident in applying your most common fighting techniques in a free fight, then all that is left is do you know your techniques will have the desired effect once you apply them?
for this its pretty much all just conditioning. if you cannot put your fingers into a steak, why bother even thinking about a living throat...if you cannot rend and tear a feathered turkey....then why bother with a face? personally i would rather use tools to maim.
For whoso comes amongst many shall one day find that no one man is by so far the mightiest of all.
None of this was usually an issue in the "old says" since by the time you learned the "too deadlY' were had already developed the skills ( via fighting) you need to apply the "too deadly" so you didn't have to worry about whether you could.
Psalms 144:1
Praise be my Lord my Rock,
He trains my hands for war, my fingers for battle !
condemned criminals should still be used for martial arts studies.
For whoso comes amongst many shall one day find that no one man is by so far the mightiest of all.
i just modify alot of the "too deadly attacks" to land on legal spots
i figure if i want to fight "dirty" ill just be able to do it if i need to and from my small street fighting experience i didnt have a hard time alternating from legal to dirty
for example in the Saifa bunkai there is a move where you grab the hair and pull them into an upper cut.Obviously in most fight settings you cant pull the hair so i just grab the back of the head or neck and i got legal dirty boxing in mma
I am pork boy, the breakfast monkey.
left leg: mild bruising. right leg: charley horse
handsomerest member of KFM forum hands down
There is "dirty throwing" as well. In the following move (at 0.03), if you just sit down on your opponent's right knee instead of step your left leg forward, you can send him to emergency room for knee operation.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ARDeMEP_V1k
I usually just go to the shooting range. In theory- paintball and airsoft should also make good substitutes for training the too deadly techniques.
Youknowwho already knows the answer to this first question...
IE, how many "no rules" fights do you think Chang Dung Sheng had? The guy was a military officer and sort of state police as well. He had plenty. Yet he still seemed to think that basic and straight forward worked. He was not an advocate of chi blasts, dim mak, etc
In Brazil for quite a long time they really were "no rules" / vale tudo... there is plenty of kung fu in Brazil, but no one stepped into the ring to dim mak any of those guys
Some people will stick their fingers in their ears and go "na na" over and over again, doesn't change the basic truth
i dim mak everything
For whoso comes amongst many shall one day find that no one man is by so far the mightiest of all.