Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 25 of 25

Thread: Misconceptions about Wing Chun

  1. #16
    The basic ideas being developed in dan chi sao onwards and redundant aspects....many are confused by chi sao and its goals.

  2. #17
    Quote Originally Posted by CFT View Post
    We've seen quite a few videos now of Philipp Bayer training and using his Ving Tsun. No doubt he is an inspiration to his students and those in the wider VT/WC community.

    Something occured to me the other day about some of the actions and hand 'postures' in Wing Chun.

    Wu sao is performed with hand outstretched, fingers vertical. Some people perform laap sau as a grabbing/pulling action.

    Clearly Philipp can't do that on one side because he only has one hand. This made me question some of the basic premises of the Wing Chun postures/actions. How is the basic action performed, from where? I'm guessing elbow, elbow, elbow.

    Comments? Especially from PB students Kevin G and Graham H.
    Think tut sao aka shaving hands. We make new striking attacks by recycling the lead,spent fist, with a new wu sao [aka new attacking hand].
    When we make a rear wu with bong, for example, we try to drop bong elbow as wu strikes out, like abstract tut sao. Thereby combining, striking, clearing line and meeting any obstructions 'mindlessly' as we strike attack along the centerline...so wu to fok in slt reinforces this ....elbow in and forwards from X'ing centerline at wrists.

    Do you know the difference between lop sao and jut sao ? When you would use one or the other and why ? Philipp explained it clearly.
    Last edited by k gledhill; 04-08-2011 at 03:42 PM.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,299
    Quote Originally Posted by Sean66 View Post
    You said it CFT; elbow, elbow elbow. And the connection between the elbows and the hips. This is drilled over and over again in chi sao, lap sau and the various footwork drills- along with pretty much everything else!

    Here is how Mr. Bayer described it during a recent discussion on a German martial arts forum:

    "Lap Sao zb. dient u.a. der Koordination zwischen Jut und dem Fausstoß. Koordination von Hüfte und Ellenbogen und Zug, mit dem Ziel die Kraft des ganzen Körpers in die Schläge bringen zu können...."

    "Lap Sao, for example, helps build, among other things, the coordination between the Jut and punch. Coordination between hips, elbows and pull - the goal being the ability to bring the power of the whole body into one's punches...."(italics mine)
    This is the same for other activities from boxing to throwing a ball.

    It's just that 'traditional' training goes about linking all of this bass ackwards.
    “An ounce of action is worth a ton of theory.” – Friedrich Engels

  4. #19
    Quote Originally Posted by couch View Post
    This is the same for other activities from boxing to throwing a ball.

    It's just that 'traditional' training goes about linking all of this bass ackwards.
    None of the above strike and use elbows, facing like VT . Sadly the 'wrist' has been taking over in bad chi-sao exchanges for years.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Lille, France
    Posts
    291
    Throwing a ball normally uses mostly shoulder and arm muscles together with the "whipping" of the wrist.

    But if you want to throw a ball well, like a good pitcher, you have to get your whole body behind it. And hopefully you have a good coach who can teach you good "body methods" to do this, like pushing off the rubber correctly and the coordination between hip and shoulder on the follow-through. If you don't have a good coach, you'll probably end up throwing out your arm.
    This is what happened to me as a freshman pitching on the varsity team (going waaaay back!). The coaches had me throwing weighted balls instead of teaching me proper body mechanics. By the end of the season my arm was finished.

    I agree about boxers, they get their whole body behind punches as well. But as Kevin pointed out, Ving Tsun is not boxing, and has different training requirements. Nonetheless, it's logically constructed pedagogically....why do you say it develops whole body power in a "bass ackwards" manner? Maybe you could elaborate.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,519
    what is the difference between Wing Chun and Ving Tsun? and why is there a difference in spelling if they are the same? Clearly one can not be the other, or is it just a geographical thing, like Hong Kong or Berlin?
    Jackie Lee

  7. #22
    Quote Originally Posted by Lee Chiang Po View Post
    what is the difference between Wing Chun and Ving Tsun? and why is there a difference in spelling if they are the same? Clearly one can not be the other, or is it just a geographical thing, like Hong Kong or Berlin?
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    I belive the Chinese written characters are the same for the Cantonese sounds for wing chun and ving tsun. Preferences are by choice of schools and teachers.
    In the north it becomes yong chun in the romanization.
    Leung Ting prefers Wing Tsun.
    William Cheung uses Traditional Wing Chun.
    Romanization of cantonese is less uniform than of mandarin terms.

    Hooray for chaos.

    jc

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    North London, England
    Posts
    3,003
    Quote Originally Posted by Lee Chiang Po View Post
    what is the difference between Wing Chun and Ving Tsun? and why is there a difference in spelling if they are the same? Clearly one can not be the other, or is it just a geographical thing, like Hong Kong or Berlin?
    Joy is correct. The Romanization of the characters varies actually depending on what Cantonese-English dictionaries you use. The character for ving/wing and tsun/tjun/chun is the same. Unless you go into the new'er' 'weng' that is only slightly different than 'wing' and I'm waiting for a new millennium version too! Maybe we will all be Yong Chun by 2020

    There are a few stories that explain a little of the history behind the 'name change' because originally Ip (originially Yip!) Mans students spelt it as Wing Chun and some felt that using the WC abreviation in the UK was just asking for insults from other Martial Artists!
    Ti Fei
    詠春國術

  9. #24
    Quote Originally Posted by LoneTiger108 View Post
    Joy is correct. The Romanization of the characters varies actually depending on what Cantonese-English dictionaries you use. The character for ving/wing and tsun/tjun/chun is the same. Unless you go into the new'er' 'weng' that is only slightly different than 'wing' and I'm waiting for a new millennium version too! Maybe we will all be Yong Chun by 2020

    There are a few stories that explain a little of the history behind the 'name change' because originally Ip (originially Yip!) Mans students spelt it as Wing Chun and some felt that using the WC abreviation in the UK was just asking for insults from other Martial Artists!
    The way things - including the constant cluelessness - in this forum are going, don't be surprised that I start referring to many posters, as practitioners of WIND CHUN.....

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    4,699
    Quote Originally Posted by Lee Chiang Po View Post
    what is the difference between Wing Chun and Ving Tsun? and why is there a difference in spelling if they are the same? Clearly one can not be the other, or is it just a geographical thing, like Hong Kong or Berlin?
    Here you go:
    http://forum.kungfumagazine.com/foru...ght=wing+choon
    Since Chinese don't use Roman letters it's ALWAYS going to be Wing Cheun/Choon in Cantonese. No native speaker will pronounce the V. In English was can write V-V W or two U's for the letter W. So Ving is still pronounced Wing regardless of how we Westerners spell it.
    Sifu Phillip Redmond
    Traditional Wing Chun Academy NYC/L.A.
    菲利普雷德蒙師傅
    傳統詠春拳學院紐約市

    WCKwoon
    wck
    sifupr

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •