Care to discuss?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZVUAB...&feature=feedu
Voice Of Reason
Care to discuss?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZVUAB...&feature=feedu
Some people's kids!
周洪龍 金山鴻勝武舘 - 鴻勝佛家正宗
When i watched that, i thought the same thing. But at the same time, i wondered if things would have been different if he had a real partner there as well.
Hung Sing Boyz, we gottit on lock down
when he's around quick to ground and pound a clown
Bruh we thought you knew better
when it comes to head huntin, ain't no one can do it better
Chop Choy
The video's about translating CLF stance principles to ground positions, so as part 1 I think it was probably clearer without a partner, and there is a place for solo position drills. I practice them on a heavy bag, but I'm twice the size of Niel.
As for the content, certainly interesting. I generally just say Kum Quai Ma (pressing down horse/frog stance) or Lok Quai Ma (kneeling down horse) for top positions, but I understand what he's saying about making them analogous to standing stances. As long as he goes on to address posture and arm positions, it's all fine.
"The man who stands for nothing is likely to fall for anything"
www.swindonkungfu.co.uk
周洪龍 金山鴻勝武舘 - 鴻勝佛家正宗
I can agree on that right there. Kneeling horse can be used to kneel down on a person's stomach when the fights on the ground and strike at the same time.but I understand what he's saying about making them analogous to standing stances.
Hung Sing Boyz, we gottit on lock down
when he's around quick to ground and pound a clown
Bruh we thought you knew better
when it comes to head huntin, ain't no one can do it better
Registered User
Only someone who knows nothing about grappling would attempt to demonstrate grappling without an actual partner.
Without the context of a partner, the things he showed mean nothing.
pagan kickboxing taoist
Most of what he was describing was basic understandings in grappling. rudementary understandings . Postioning mostly but he was comparing it to standing stances in CLF. nothing wrong with that if your teaching someone with an understanding of CLF principals.
Have to agree with others that you need a partner to show for better understanding even if it is transitions and positioning. Grappling is so hard to describe for understanding, you have to show. It's not like punching or kicking a lot of its through "feel".
Originally posted by BawangOriginally posted by Bawangi had an old taichi lady talk smack behind my back. i mean comon man, come on. if it was 200 years ago,, mebbe i wouldve smacked her and took all her monehs.i am manly and strong. do not insult me cracker.
Troll Slayer
There ARE cross overs between traditional concept of "stance" and ground positions, HOWEVER showing them like this is pretty much worthless. Show them on a live person, with the person showing resistance, particularly trying to escape, show how to maintain the stance and flow into other positions
The other huge danger here is he is trying to re-invent the wheel. He is guessing at how these things work as opposed to just "emptying his cup" and seeking knowledge from those who already know
Chan Tai San Book at https://www.createspace.com/4891253
Originally Posted by taai gihk yahn
Chop Choy
It's part 1, his videos often go to part 13, Im sure a partner will be involved soon.
Last edited by Ben Gash; 05-29-2011 at 10:25 AM.
"The man who stands for nothing is likely to fall for anything"
www.swindonkungfu.co.uk
Registered User
In striking art, you may learn solo first and 2 men later. In grappling art, you have to learn 2 men first. You can draw a point on the wall and pretend that's your opponent's head and punch/kick at it. You can't draw a human body on the wall and pretend that's the body you are wrestling with.
Chop Choy
"The man who stands for nothing is likely to fall for anything"
www.swindonkungfu.co.uk
Troll Slayer
motion master is used to practice AFTER you have learned the positions and how they work
In addition, I need not remind you that Erik Paulson is a black belt in BJJ, has wrestling, sambo, shooto and judo training...
Chan Tai San Book at https://www.createspace.com/4891253
Registered User
You can use solo training to polish and memorize your skill "after" you have developed your skill but not before it.
If you are a virgin and never had sex experience before, pretending to have sex with your imaginary girl is not going to make you a "man".
Last edited by YouKnowWho; 05-29-2011 at 09:04 PM.
pagan kickboxing taoist
I'll have to agree with this toward grappling.You can use solo training to polish and memorize your skill "after" you have developed your skill but not before it.
Originally posted by BawangOriginally posted by Bawangi had an old taichi lady talk smack behind my back. i mean comon man, come on. if it was 200 years ago,, mebbe i wouldve smacked her and took all her monehs.i am manly and strong. do not insult me cracker.
Registered User
reminds me of the old burt richardson story when he met Yoshida and asked him how to get good at arm bars, Yoshida said he practised them a 100 times a day, next time he visited burt he saw him repping out the arm bars on a dummy and laughed and said no i rolled with 100 different guys and only tap them with arm bars.......no other way to get good at something in grappling than with a resisting partner ........of course non grapplers wont get that story
攻裏有防 , 防裏有攻
CMAs trying to catch a drift of the BJJ explosion. Nothing more.
It is bias to think that the art of war is just for killing people. It is not to kill people, it is to kill evil. It is a strategem to give life to many people by killing the evil of one person.
- Yagyū Munenori
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote