Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 39

Thread: Is Wing Chun for Everybody?

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    482
    Quote Originally Posted by Lee Chiang Po View Post
    ...I was sworn to never teach it outside my race. Which I promised and will never do.
    You comment speaks volumes, but leaves one question unanswered: Why do you bother to post in English on a public forum debating with gwai-lo?
    "No contaban con mi astucia!" --el Chapulin Colorado

    http://www.vingtsunaz.com/
    www.nationalvt.com/

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    2,252
    Quote Originally Posted by Grumblegeezer View Post
    You comment speaks volumes, but leaves one question unanswered: Why do you bother to post in English on a public forum debating with gwai-lo?


    Oh, to remind us westerners that we dont REALLY have the real Wing chun.

    How nice of him.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    2,252
    Wing Chun is for people who actually want to train in a system and maintain their healthy interest in kung fu for life. It isn't for the passing crowds that tend to exist more today than before. It isn't for the 'quick fix' generation that just want to learn a few sansau techniques either.
    But doesnt the whole Ng Mui legend talk about how it was developed as an effective self defense system,learnt in a short time compared to the traditional styles??

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    North London, England
    Posts
    3,003
    Quote Originally Posted by GlennR View Post
    But doesnt the whole Ng Mui legend talk about how it was developed as an effective self defense system,learnt in a short time compared to the traditional styles??
    Dude, I could teach you and entire curriculum in one day but that doesn't mean you understand what I'm talking about! And wasn't Wing Chun already a Martial Artist when she met Ng Mui? Her father was her teacher, no?

    Different course for different horses.

    Quote Originally Posted by GlennR View Post
    Oh, to remind us westerners that we dont REALLY have the real Wing chun.
    Truth hurts sometimes doesn't it?

    Having Wing Chun passed to you verbally (in English) and somehow managing to get some sort of natural fighting ability from your time and effort is something that I think everybody will relate to. Even me.

    But to be 'given' Wing Chun in it's natural tongue, written down and broken down into easy-to-remeber blocks for teaching purposes IS a totally different experience imho. Maybe that's all Jackies saying. He's been lucky enough to learn from the page.

    But I couldn't say that this has not been shared with westerners, because I learnt like that too and so have many others (some post here!) But I will tell you one thing. I've seen guys progress so much quicker when they know the original cantonese language and curriculums.
    Ti Fei
    詠春國術

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    North London, England
    Posts
    3,003
    A great example of a Chinese/English curriculum imho some repeats and not the same as what I practise completely, but everything on there is familiar to me and my experience, as it should be to anyone who has gone through all the forms and weaponry imho.
    Ti Fei
    詠春國術

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    phoenix, az
    Posts
    302
    in reality, what I was looking for in kung fu I normally would not have picked wing chun as an option. It is only my sifu Grumblegeezer that keeps me sticking with the style. So in reality sometimes it comes down more to having the right sifu than having the right style I think. Just my two cents

  7. #22
    3 years for wooden dummy training????? 4 years for Bil Jee???? You got to be joking!!! What a load of tat!!!!

    GH

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    North London, England
    Posts
    3,003
    Quote Originally Posted by Graham H View Post
    3 years for wooden dummy training????? 4 years for Bil Jee???? You got to be joking!!! What a load of tat!!!!

    GH
    A sideways pot shot at Augustine Fongs curriculum G??

    Then by all means share yours...
    Ti Fei
    詠春國術

  9. #24
    Quote Originally Posted by LoneTiger108 View Post
    A sideways pot shot at Augustine Fongs curriculum G??

    Then by all means share yours...
    Sideways??? No it was full frontal!! Too complicated and teaching things to long after a student needs it!!! However if AF's students are only training once a week for an hour then I get it!!

    GH

  10. #25
    Quote Originally Posted by Graham H View Post
    Sideways??? No it was full frontal!! Too complicated and teaching things to long after a student needs it!!! However if AF's students are only training once a week for an hour then I get it!!

    GH
    It's not written in stone, largely up to the student. This is the traditional time frame. Correct foundation will cause you to plateau less in your progress...

  11. #26
    Quote Originally Posted by WC1277 View Post
    It's not written in stone, largely up to the student. This is the traditional time frame. Correct foundation will cause you to plateau less in your progress...
    Traditional time frame? Don't make me laugh!

  12. #27
    Quote Originally Posted by Graham H View Post
    Traditional time frame? Don't make me laugh!
    laugh ? read the kwan sao thread from wc1277....I cant even reply due to the depth of bewilderment I feel for him.

  13. #28
    Read $traditional$ time frame

  14. #29
    Quote Originally Posted by k gledhill View Post
    laugh ? read the kwan sao thread from wc1277....I cant even reply due to the depth of bewilderment I feel for him.
    I did but there is no point in posting in that thread because all of what WC1277 (and those that agree) are talking about is nonsense.

    So Kwan Sau is meant to be about untying from a bridged position eh?? Is it FOOK!!

    GH

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    2,252
    Quote Originally Posted by LoneTiger108 View Post
    Dude, I could teach you and entire curriculum in one day but that doesn't mean you understand what I'm talking about! And wasn't Wing Chun already a Martial Artist when she met Ng Mui? Her father was her teacher, no?

    Different course for different horses.
    Dude, (are you serious), what would you teach me in a day?
    Fighting application?
    No, youd lecture me in HOW i should learn and not what i should strive for.
    You really are lost in your own nonsense.

    Truth hurts sometimes doesn't it?
    Yeh right, truth from a pseudo intellect and a guy (jackie) who constantly goes on about his countless no-holds encounters...... im awed by you you 2

    But to be 'given' Wing Chun in it's natural tongue, written down and broken down into easy-to-remeber blocks for teaching purposes IS a totally different experience imho. Maybe that's all Jackies saying. He's been lucky enough to learn from the page.
    That is the biggest load of nonsense i have ever heard. Your sycophantic drivel is whats wrong with TCMA today.

    But I couldn't say that this has not been shared with westerners, because I learnt like that too and so have many others (some post here!) But I will tell you one thing. I've seen guys progress so much quicker when they know the original cantonese language and curriculums.
    And i see the westerners kick the "enlightened" butts constantly..... lets just hope their translation is right while they are getting belted

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •