In another thread HumWCGuy said his lineage of WC did not do chi sao?
Can you have WC without doing chi sao?
In another thread HumWCGuy said his lineage of WC did not do chi sao?
Can you have WC without doing chi sao?
If some would consider it to not be "true" WC, I am comfortable with that. I tend to refer to it as non-classical WC to differentiate.
Psalms 144:1
Praise be my Lord my Rock,
He trains my hands for war, my fingers for battle !
Even though we don't emphasize chi sao, early on when we sparred (intra school) it would devolve into chi sao like battles because the techniques are the techniques. The thing that I noticed is that resisting the urge to "play Wing Chun," with people raised my effectiveness.
It's my opinon that for Chi Sao to transfer to combat as it is sometimes done, someone has to agree to, "play Wing Chun." Now I don't want to generalize to every lineage or school because i have only experienced, JKD, VTM, Dr. Wu's guys out of Columbus?, and Unknown (Darrell Jordan's guy?).
Edit: I am certainly interested in your thoughts since you have such an opposing view point.
Last edited by HumbleWCGuy; 07-19-2011 at 12:12 PM.
To each his own, but I find it IMO next to impossible for someone to figure out how to connect to their opponents center(not their arms) without Chi Sao development which really is what WC is all about. Disruption of the opponents center while maintaining your own.
I've always been of the belief that there's two types of WC out there. One that is just Kung Fu utilizing arm techniques and attacks, really no different from any other style, and then there is one that utilizes structure where your only goal is to attack and "blocking" is only the result of the attack. The latter can't be developed to it's potential without Chi Sao.....
A thread started by a troll. Don't feed the trolls.!!
JC