you might want to read this thread..
.http://kungfumagazine.com/forum/showthread.php?t=61459
For personal self defense
To attack someone
To stop a break-in or some other crime
To avenge your master....haha
you might want to read this thread..
.http://kungfumagazine.com/forum/showthread.php?t=61459
This why you are disliked. Someone makes an innocuous thread abut whether or not people have used their skills on the street. This could lead to a number of discussions far more interesting, yet you decide to attack the original poster for being a LARPER.
Edit:
It's this crap that caused Jamieson to jump on you. It's funny how you started playing the victim. Now you are back to your antics as I knew you would be. As I said, it really is going to come down to Gene showing the the door permanently as many other forums have done.
Last edited by HumbleWCGuy; 08-12-2011 at 07:18 PM.
Yes, I went fishing...I do have a life other than posting here.
It's just a simple question...only someone insecure would be botherd by it.
The fact is, I only need 1 other person other than myself to prove this simple point. ergo Success.
++++++++++++++++++++++++\
Where did I claim that Kung Fu wins 165% of the time????
In fact, humbly... I only asked if anyone had ever succeeded in it's use... and to speak up about it. In truth that is all I need to prove my point....that TMA's ARE Indeed valid.
I have personally taught raw students TCMA (meaning that’s all they know) and they have used it in Street fights.... very well I might add. That's good enough for me. Just because they are not super human San Da fighters doesn't mean that what they have achieved was not valid.
Sorry I don't have a YouTube of the time when one of my students "Vernon" went to Montreal on his 18th birthday (... and there's really only one reason for an 18yrs old to go to Montreal if you get me
Out side in the parking lot, he got into and argument followed by a fight. What Vernon didn't know was that the guy put his keys in-between his fingers and was punching at his face. Vernon, dodged the 1st couple of strikes and then got into his rhythm and did a simple block punch combo. Every style has it. But luckily landed right on the chin when the dudes mouth was open. Vernon knocked the dude out!! I told him how lucky he was but it doesn't change what happened. I took a raw student and taught him successfully to defend himself and it WORKED!!
All your BS cannot take that away from him ROSS. It doesn't matter if he or his opponent was not a professionally trained PRO.
++++++++++++
About trained or untrained opponents.......
I'm gonna take a page from Gene's book and say that some Trained fighters are just "Sal Fencers" That means they only fight well in their Home Gym.
An Untrained guy who is athletic and hell-bent on hurting you is Still very dangerous. Sometimes, because of their Un-orthodox nature...more so. Also the bigger and crazier he is can matter...size does make a difference.
That is the reason why sometimes Pro Boxers hate to fight amateurs. Because of their un orthodox nature, they havnt yet learned to move and fight at a professional level and that makes them very unpredictable sometimes.
Lastly Ross, I'm AGAINST the Tru 2 forms hippies you do realize that right? I was pretty clear in the other thread. Please don’t try and lump me into a crowd of Pajama wearing hippies. I’ve fought MMA and have my own San Shou belts @ 85KG and still I choose to train TCMA.
You just have to have the right teacher and the student work hard. Also as I’ve always said, in any discipline, your going to have God given Talented fighters and other students who will never achieve it. It’s just life.
If you’ve never figured it out, that’s not my problem.
http://cykwoon.freewebspace.com/
https://www.youtube.com/user/Subitai
"O"..."Some people believe that you need to make another human being tap out to be a valid art. But I am constantly reminding them that I only have to defend myself and keep you from hurting me in order to Win."
"O"..."The Hung Style practiced solely in methods of Antiquity would ultimately only be useful versus Similar skill sets"
I have seen the thread. Ross is just posting pictures and regurgitating applications and information. A first year Wing Chun student with access to a good Wing Chun book can do the same as Ross, as regards Wing Chun applications.
Now, if you look at this current thread and note how it started:
The man is asking a simple question which in not so many words enquires if anyone has used TCMAs successfuly in a street situation. Subitai adds that HE HAS!Originally Posted by Subitai
The last bit seems to have pinched a nerve in Dave Ross as it goes against the whole marketing premise for his kickboxing school, which dictates that TCMAs are not applicable for combat.
So, "Kung fu Clueless Dave" comes back with the following brutish response:
Then just in case there was any doubt in anyone's mind about "Kung fu Clueless Dave's" insecurities:Originally Posted by lkfmdc
I mean who the hell said anything about "Kung fu Clueless Dave's" beloved contact sports martial arts? NO one, absolutely NO ONE!Originally Posted by lkfmdc
Then we have one more sarcastic and insecure "gem" from Kung fu Clueless Dave:
And then (and as usual) Kung fu Clueless Dave, putting words into people's mouths:Originally Posted by lkfmdc
Where did Subitai say anything like that? Where does Kung fu Clueless Dave, get the idea that all TCMA schools just teach forms and instruct their students to "fight like it's a form"?Originally Posted by lkfmdc
I'll tell you where, he gets it from his kickboxing school's marketing strategy. Every time he posts clueless comments like the above he hopes that third party newbies will read it and assume that all TCMA is cr@p and then run along to Kung fu Clueless Dave's New York San Duh! school to learn the "realz" fighting!
THERE IS MORE:
When Ginosifu made the following post:
Then Kung fu Clueless Dave came back with his "profound" take on TCMA's animal clawing techniques (LOL!):Originally Posted by ginosifu
LOL, just LOL!Originally Posted by lkfmdc
The man doesn't know how to distinguish between grabbing someone with an open hand a Tiger Claw! LOL!
Boy, CTS must be looking down from the heavens and laughing his head off at Gwailo "Kung fu Clueless Dave's" foot in the mouth moments...LOL!
dense and no sense of humor
try to re-read that one, maybe look at the picture...
Seriously, if you can't understand that comment, there is no future in even answering you
and AGAIN, what exactly does that prove?
I see you frothing against "san da" but can't even explain what "kung fu" fighting is supposed to look like if it isn't san da like
You also have said some of the worst cliche tripe about kickboxing, showing you don't understand anything about kickboxing
You're post so far are illogical, they don't make coherent points
And LMFAO at your attempt to dig at me with gossip and BS...
Could a moderator do something about these personal attacks by hardwork108 (again)?
OOOOOOh BOY!Could a moderator do something about these personal attacks by hardwork108 (again)?
Reply With Quote
Last edited by Lebaufist; 08-12-2011 at 10:09 PM.
Again logic fail.
1. who has used CMA in an actual situation?
2. your assertion "but it doesn't mean its effective." Or so it seems overtly.
3. Yes I've taught effective cma people.
4. what does that prove?
You don't see how you're failing the logic test here?
It had to have been effective for it to work. The insistence as to whether the individual can be effective 100% of the time against all opponents is a strawman argument. No one is effective against all opponents. Not even your students.
3...2...1
closed.
Kung Fu is good for you.