So a country facing record levels of unemployment is not facing high unemployment in their country because other countries have higher unemployment levels, right?Originally Posted by Taixuquan99
Banned
So a country facing record levels of unemployment is not facing high unemployment in their country because other countries have higher unemployment levels, right?
Banned
So if we see inflation levels at 80%, we wont have an inflation problem because Zimbabwe is facing 79,600,000,000% inflation levels, correct?
Registered User
I've found using your justifications as a foundation for more sound justifications saves the trouble of responding to empty rhetoric.
It's rather nice, really. Enjoyable, and you get to focus more time commenting on Yahoo news regarding how Obama was the cause of the cancellation of Kate Plus 8.
It's a win-win.
Banned
"In 2009, Fuerteventura recorded the highest EU regional unemployment rate at a NUTS3 level, at 29.2 percent."
Sources:
http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/por...ta/main_tables
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuerteventura
If high unemployment causes rioting, where were/are the Fuerteventura riots? They have unemployment levels higher than in Britain and in the US.
Banned
Fixed that for ya.
Registered User
It's kind of hard to get enough people together to riot when your entire country's population doesn't even match the population of one of the cities we're talking about. Their entire population, in the whole country, is not a hundredth of London's, and Phillie's population is over twenty times the size of the entire nation's population as well.
Not to mention that people working in the tourist trade tend to be unemployed most of the year.
Registered User
Let's assume that, if a country that hasn't, for a long time, experienced much unemployment, and is now experiencing unemployment less than others, but more than they did before, is going to feel the same stresses that countries facing more unemployment are.
First, this would hardly make a good claim that their superior moral system makes them less likely to riot, since less unemployment is stressing them the same.
But let's ignore that. Let's assume it's true.
Your new argument is now "Japan is more moral than London, or Phillie, or Americans during the Great Depression."
It's a strange argument, but, if we allow those points, dubious as they are, then you are absolutely right. The Japanese, with their atheistic-agnostic majority of citizens, are more moral than these other groups.
Registered User
Incorrect:
Nothing about long form there.
Nothing there either.
1bad65, you make me laugh. Dare I say it? You seem to be suffering from ODS (Obama Derangement Syndrome).
"I didn't vote for him but he's my president, and I hope he does a good job." - John Wayne
Clearly you want President Obama to fail, or else you wouldn't bring up every little thing you can to try and discredit him and his Administration. You seems to be actively hoping for failure.
Perhaps you can take a lesson from The Duke.
Registered User
High unemployment of young males has been shown, time and again, to be a good indicator of the possibility of unrest in a nation.
Banned
Poland, India, Turkey, France, Hungary, Saudi Arabia, Bulgaria, Portugal, Ireland, Georgia, Lithuania, and Spain, (and many more smaller nations) all have unemployment higher than the US and Great Britain. Where are the riots in those countries?
Banned
Parse words if you must. The fact is he released the "Certification of Live Birth" as proof enough. So when I typed it, I knew that, and I assume you and the rest of us knew that too. So it's pretty obvious what I meant.
If you read Post #62 in that thread you pulled that quote of mine from, it's made very clear.
Last edited by BJJ-Blue; 08-18-2011 at 07:07 AM.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote