Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Is Hung Ga s Tid Sin Kuen Iron Wire Form from old Hung Ga ?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Dayton,Ohio,U.S.A.
    Posts
    662

    Is Hung Ga s Tid Sin Kuen Iron Wire Form from old Hung Ga ?

    Is Tit Kiu Sams Iron Wire form Tit Sin Kuen from old or Villiage Hung Ga ? it seems to use the Yee Gi Kim Yueng Ma stance and the Hay Sa Fu Hung Ga uses this stance ? Just wondering if this form was one of the things that was not really changed that much from its original foundations from Tit Kiu Sam s time or was it also changed by Wong Fei Hung and Lam Sai Wing ?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    22,250
    One stance does not a form make so you can't really decide on the origin of a form based on one of the main stances.
    Which seems to be what you are doing.
    From my understanding Hay Sa Fu Hung Ga added their IW from the WFH branch of Hung Ga, it wasn't original to it ( I could be wrong but I recall reading that and I think Gene mentioned that also).
    The qigong in the TSK was present in Hung Ga before the development of the TSK, I think that Tit saw that it was good to put them all in one form ( by all I mean the bridges and "killing hands").
    Whether there was modifications to it after that is speculative but I would think so, I mean why not?
    I don't think the core, the "heart" was changes but having seen a FEW versions it seems that some of the footwork was modified in some lineages and the reasons were probably practical ones ( limited space for example).
    Psalms 144:1
    Praise be my Lord my Rock,
    He trains my hands for war, my fingers for battle !

  3. #3
    To my understanding, there are three main types of Hung Gar -

    + Futsan Hung Kuen (Wong Fei Hung, Lam family, Dang Family, etc)
    + Fadou Hung Kuen (Tam family, Chow family, etc..)
    + Tsamkong Hung Kuen (Yeungkong, Moumeng, 5 pattern hung kuen, Ha Sei Fu...etc)

    By far the most prominent/popular is of the Futsan Hung Gar of which there is the Tit Sin Kuen set. The others (often deemed village or older style) do not practice this set. However, most of the methods are already included within other practices in any cases just not compiled the same.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Dayton,Ohio,U.S.A.
    Posts
    662
    Thanks Guys i understand .

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canada!
    Posts
    23,110
    It's shaolin.

    that is all.
    Kung Fu is good for you.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Huntington, NY, USA website: TenTigers.com
    Posts
    7,718
    many Village styles have a version of tiet sien kuen, samjien tiet sien, etc Hak Fu Mun has it as well.
    "My Gung-Fu may not be Your Gung-Fu.
    Gwok-Si, Gwok-Faht"

    "I will not be part of the generation
    that killed Kung-Fu."

    ....step.

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by TenTigers View Post
    many Village styles have a version of tiet sien kuen, samjien tiet sien, etc Hak Fu Mun has it as well.
    Like which?

    (samjin titsin is Futsan)

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Huntington, NY, USA website: TenTigers.com
    Posts
    7,718
    not sure, but if you do a search on youtube, several come up.
    "My Gung-Fu may not be Your Gung-Fu.
    Gwok-Si, Gwok-Faht"

    "I will not be part of the generation
    that killed Kung-Fu."

    ....step.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Dayton,Ohio,U.S.A.
    Posts
    662

    Now Im confused

    So are you guys saying that Tit Kiew Sams Tit San Kuen Form is different from this Sam Jin Tiet Sien Kuen ?

  10. #10

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •