Page 5 of 15 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 221

Thread: Chum Kiu

  1. #61
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    4,699
    Quote Originally Posted by Vajramusti View Post
    ---------------------------------

    Good demo of a lan usage.

    loy
    I use a horizontal lan to pin the arm at 2:33 here:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VLAg7b4VkyA
    Sifu Phillip Redmond
    Traditional Wing Chun Academy NYC/L.A.
    菲利普雷德蒙師傅
    傳統詠春拳學院紐約市

    WCKwoon
    wck
    sifupr

  2. #62
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    St.Louis Missouri
    Posts
    2,175
    Quote Originally Posted by Phil Redmond View Post
    I use a horizontal lan to pin the arm at 2:33 here:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VLAg7b4VkyA
    Very Interesting...I like the idea behind what your doing. We do the something simliar in basics...not in chum kiu though..
    The Flow is relentless like a raging ocean with crashing waves devasting anything in its path.

    "Kick Like Thunder, Strike Like Lighting, Fist Hard as Stones."

    "Wing Chun flows around overwhelming force and finds openings with its constant flow of forward energy."

    "Always Attack, Be Aggressive always Attack first, Be Relentless. Continue with out ceasing. Flow Like Water, Move like the wind, Attack Like Fire. Consume and overwhelm your Adversary until he is No More"

  3. #63
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    North London, England
    Posts
    3,003
    Quote Originally Posted by Phil Redmond View Post
    I use a horizontal lan to pin the arm at 2:33 here:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VLAg7b4VkyA
    I think my time here is coming to an end. I can not believe what I am seeing to be honest. After everything I have tried to say and explain, Phil (one of the more experienced and elder members of this little community!) shows us this.

    Now I'm not saying that what he is doing is not related to some part of Chum Kiu, because it is. But single lansau??? Have I not already highlighted that 'pinning' is not 'barring'?? It is almost identical to what John was showing! And that idea imho is simply confused...

    I am wondering if anyone else here can feel my pain?!
    Ti Fei
    詠春國術

  4. #64
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    North London, England
    Posts
    3,003

    Single Arm Lansau - Chum Kiu Form

    I really do not like using others to highlight my point, but this is one of the better pictures I could find to help explain what I am saying and it happens to be of a good martial colleague of mine, Sifu McKenzie



    THIS is the exact single handed posture where you can issue maximium force with minimum effort, and it partly relies on a torquing of the waist (in this case, twisting to the right)

    How are any of the clips from Phil or John showing THIS posture and method in ACTION?

    FWIW and IMHO they are not. Simple. And these guys claim to know the second form and what it is for?? Or are they just playing with all of us? It's almost like what the guys are showing is the bongsau that comes next? (thaks to Sifu Kwok!)

    Last edited by LoneTiger108; 02-11-2012 at 04:43 AM.
    Ti Fei
    詠春國術

  5. #65
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    North London, England
    Posts
    3,003

    Now I can see (I think!)

    Well, after looking through some clips I think I can see why Phil has a different view of Chum Kiu's Lansau set, because it looks like he is practising & teaching something that has had 'massive' changes by his Sifu.

    I didn't realize that Master Cheung had changed so much of the original Ip Man version, and I struggled to see a comprehensive Lansau in this set

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7glkJuiJR20

    Do you still practise/teach the 'basic' version Phil?
    Ti Fei
    詠春國術

  6. #66
    Quote Originally Posted by LoneTiger108 View Post
    I really do not like using others to highlight my point, but this is one of the better pictures I could find to help explain what I am saying and it happens to be of a good martial colleague of mine, Sifu McKenzie



    THIS is the exact single handed posture where you can issue maximium force with minimum effort, and it partly relies on a torquing of the waist (in this case, twisting to the right)

    How are any of the clips from Phil or John showing THIS posture and method in ACTION?

    FWIW and IMHO they are not. Simple. And these guys claim to know the second form and what it is for?? Or are they just playing with all of us? It's almost like what the guys are showing is the bongsau that comes next? (thaks to Sifu Kwok!)

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Spencer- nowadays there are all kinds of wing chun. FWIW- my lan is not like McKenxiw's and n my bong is not like Kwok's. But I do do wing chun.

    joy

  7. #67
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    1,781
    Quote Originally Posted by Vajramusti View Post
    But I "do do" wing chun.

    joy
    Well, at least you finally admit it!
    What chi sau is, or isn't, or is, or wait, what is it..: http://ezine.kungfumagazine.com/foru...2&postcount=90

  8. #68
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    North London, England
    Posts
    3,003
    Quote Originally Posted by Vajramusti View Post
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Spencer- nowadays there are all kinds of wing chun. FWIW- my lan is not like McKenxiw's and n my bong is not like Kwok's. But I do do wing chun.

    joy
    I understand the variations Joy, but being a senior student of someone who has represented Ip Man for so many years I would have thought Phil (and yourself) would have similar form and understanding.

    Obviously I was far off the mark and that is quite depressing to be honest...

    Especially when your Sifu IS doing exactly what I have discussed (first Lansau at 18sec) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dmLciBA5ILw

    I must be seeing things, but it wouldn't be the first time!!
    Ti Fei
    詠春國術

  9. #69
    Quote Originally Posted by LoneTiger108 View Post
    I understand the variations Joy, but being a senior student of someone who has represented Ip Man for so many years I would have thought Phil (and yourself) would have similar form and understanding.

    Obviously I was far off the mark and that is quite depressing to be honest...

    Especially when your Sifu IS doing exactly what I have discussed (first Lansau at 18sec) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dmLciBA5ILw

    I must be seeing things, but it wouldn't be the first time!!
    ------------------------------------------------------------------

    Spencer-

    Phil does TWC and it works for him. I don' do TWC. Apart from that I don't quite know what you mean?

    joy

  10. #70
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    North London, England
    Posts
    3,003
    Quote Originally Posted by Vajramusti View Post
    ------------------------------------------------------------------

    Spencer-

    Phil does TWC and it works for him. I don' do TWC. Apart from that I don't quite know what you mean?

    joy
    TWC?? Or whatever! Sifu Cheung learnt from Ip man, as did Sifu Ho Kam Ming. I would have thought that the forms would be the one true connection to all of us because there really is no room for adjustments or additions. No room for misinterpretations and such, unlike training methods and sparring ideas.

    I have already tried to explain in the previous posts and the pics were just an example of good posture of lansau and bongsau from the specific Chum Kiu set I have referred to. And in the clip of Sifu Fong he has the exact same positions in his Chum Kiu which I am referring to. Exactly the same as I learnt myself (almost!) BUT what both John and Phil have shared in their clips does not show the application of this Lansau I'm talking about!

    So what do you not understand?
    Last edited by LoneTiger108; 02-11-2012 at 12:12 PM.
    Ti Fei
    詠春國術

  11. #71
    Quote Originally Posted by LoneTiger108 View Post
    TWC?? Or whatever! Sifu Cheung learnt from Ip man, as did Sifu Ho Kam Ming. I would have thought that the forms would be the one true connection to all of us because there really is no room for adjustments or additions. No room for misinterpretations and such, unlike training methods and sparring ideas.

    I have already tried to explain in the previous posts and the pics were just an example of good posture of lansau and bongsau from the specific Chum Kiu set I have referred to. And in the clip of Sifu Fong he has the exact same positions in his Chum Kiu which I am referring to. Exactly the same as I learnt myself (almost!) BUT what both John and Phil have shared in their clips does not show the application of this Lansau I'm talking about!

    So what do you not understand?
    Spencer,

    Of course there are some major differences between systems. While the Sifu is responsible for creating the textbook, the student is responsible for digesting it. It's really as simple as that... Unfortunately there's going to be things lost or changed. I'm sure even Ip Man had a slightly different or altered version of whom he learned from too. Really, at the end of the day, even Sifu's whom learned the system pure are still going to have refinements and additions to the system as their own understanding grows. This can be for better or worse, usually it is for worse. But for a select few it's for the better. Fong Sifu has refined the system significantly and is well respected for it, not because he did, but because his refinement stayed universally true to the core of the system.

    There are others who did the same but are not as well respected beyond their association to Ip Man, because their understanding didn't stay true to the universal truth of the system.

    There is no magic to wing chun, just "common sense" as Fong Sifu says....

  12. #72
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Baltimore, MD
    Posts
    284
    Quote Originally Posted by LoneTiger108 View Post
    TWC?? good posture of lansau and bongsau from the specific Chum Kiu set I have referred to.

    So what do you not understand?
    What's good posture in lan sau or bong sau? Lan sau or bong sau is not a posture. They are hand movements. It is not the beginning or end that's important, It is the movement. What your saying sounds to me like you have frozen VT into static responses.

  13. #73
    Quote Originally Posted by LoneTiger108 View Post
    I think my time here is coming to an end. I can not believe what I am seeing to be honest. After everything I have tried to say and explain, Phil (one of the more experienced and elder members of this little community!) shows us this.

    Now I'm not saying that what he is doing is not related to some part of Chum Kiu, because it is. But single lansau??? Have I not already highlighted that 'pinning' is not 'barring'?? It is almost identical to what John was showing! And that idea imho is simply confused...

    I am wondering if anyone else here can feel my pain?!
    Spencer, do you not do the double lan sau at the start of the form? The action that Phil is demonstrating in his clip is enshrined in exactly that movement, surely you don't expect someone to do double lan sau in application? and if not why do you think the other arm is there if not to use lan sau from teh trailing arm of the turn?
    The double lan sau according to the way I was taught is there to allow you to do lan sau with either arm whilst retaining structure and balance. Lan sau with the trailing arm of the turn has many, many applications including the one demoed by Phil
    A clever man learns from his mistakes but a truly wise man learns from the mistakes of others.


    Wing Chun kung fu in Redditch
    Worcestershire Wing Chun Kuen on facebook

  14. #74
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    4,699
    Quote Originally Posted by wingchunIan View Post
    Spencer, do you not do the double lan sau at the start of the form? The action that Phil is demonstrating in his clip is enshrined in exactly that movement, surely you don't expect someone to do double lan sau in application? and if not why do you think the other arm is there if not to use lan sau from teh trailing arm of the turn?
    The double lan sau according to the way I was taught is there to allow you to do lan sau with either arm whilst retaining structure and balance. Lan sau with the trailing arm of the turn has many, many applications including the one demoed by Phil
    Exactly . .
    Sifu Phillip Redmond
    Traditional Wing Chun Academy NYC/L.A.
    菲利普雷德蒙師傅
    傳統詠春拳學院紐約市

    WCKwoon
    wck
    sifupr

  15. #75
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    4,699
    Quote Originally Posted by LoneTiger108 View Post
    I think my time here is coming to an end. I can not believe what I am seeing to be honest. After everything I have tried to say and explain, Phil (one of the more experienced and elder members of this little community!) shows us this.

    Now I'm not saying that what he is doing is not related to some part of Chum Kiu, because it is. But single lansau??? Have I not already highlighted that 'pinning' is not 'barring'?? It is almost identical to what John was showing! And that idea imho is simply confused...

    I am wondering if anyone else here can feel my pain?!
    We don't do a Lan in our Chum Kiu. We have a vertical Lan in Biu Jee though. The La that i did in the clip was from SLT and it can't be perfect like the still picture you posted. There was a real human being in front of me.
    Sifu Phillip Redmond
    Traditional Wing Chun Academy NYC/L.A.
    菲利普雷德蒙師傅
    傳統詠春拳學院紐約市

    WCKwoon
    wck
    sifupr

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •