Page 2 of 12 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 179

Thread: Alan Orr Questions 4 - Chain Punching

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    22,250
    Hey Bro!
    Hitting is only one way of comprising the opponent's structure. a very effective way, but still only one method.
    True, but we are talking about chain striking so...

    All I am saying is if the opponent adjust, we also adjust our angle accordingly to deal with his adjustment. Fighting is alive always changing from moment to moment, So my position is not fixed, if the opponent adjust his angle to square up to me I adjust as well to keep a positional advantage, being on an angle allows you to read his intent early enough to stay just ahead of him in regards to timing and gaining an advantageous position. This forces the oponent to take the long route, while I take the short root, therefore I am more economical in my movements, moving less but arriving first. One thing I should mention is that this is all going on while I am hitting him multiple times from all different angles as his lines are opening.
    As long as you don't assume that your opponent is reacting to you instead of ACTING upon you.

    There are lots of tank abbott types out there who can take a good punch. Without angular positioning and timing, even if we have amazing power we will still end up trading with them. In my opinion Boxers are some of the hardest punchers out there, because that's there main area of focus. How many times in a boxing match have you seen boxers exchange punches with little effect on both combatants, Unless it's one in a million like a young Mike Tyson.
    For sure, but in a certain way you are making my point and while I agree that angleing if crucial, i maintain my point that all the angles in the world won't save you from getting hit if the opponent isn't "preoccupied" with what you are doing.

    Boxers are taught to go in, hit hard and often and get out BECAUSE it is assumed that the other guys is gonna hit back and hit back hard.
    WC does NOT advocate the "get in, hit and get out" strategy and this is quite plain in chain striking IMO.
    Psalms 144:1
    Praise be my Lord my Rock,
    He trains my hands for war, my fingers for battle !

  2. #17

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Toronto, canada
    Posts
    964
    Blog Entries
    1

    Cool

    Quote Originally Posted by sanjuro_ronin View Post
    True, but we are talking about chain striking so...



    As long as you don't assume that your opponent is reacting to you instead of ACTING upon you.



    For sure, but in a certain way you are making my point and while I agree that angleing if crucial, i maintain my point that all the angles in the world won't save you from getting hit if the opponent isn't "preoccupied" with what you are doing.

    Boxers are taught to go in, hit hard and often and get out BECAUSE it is assumed that the other guys is gonna hit back and hit back hard.
    WC does NOT advocate the "get in, hit and get out" strategy and this is quite plain in chain striking IMO.
    I didn't know that you were referring to Chainpunching like how the Leung ting guys apply it. I don't apply it that way, the way I apply it is linking defense to bring in offense. So my retreating hand is always doing something to set up or clear the way for my forward striking hand.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    22,250
    Quote Originally Posted by kung fu fighter View Post
    I didn't know that you were referring to Chainpunching like how the Leung ting guys apply it. I don't apply it that way, the way I apply it is linking defense to bring in offense. So my retreating hand is always doing something to set up or clear the way for my forward striking hand.
    I think we may be talking a bit past each other or maybe about different things...allow me to clarify:
    To repeat this part because it is crucial:
    Boxers are taught to go in, hit hard and often and get out BECAUSE it is assumed that the other guys is gonna hit back and hit back hard.
    WC does NOT advocate the "get in, hit and get out" strategy and this is quite plain in chain striking IMO.

    I don't recall any WC principle that advocates going in, hitting and getting out.
    Do you?
    Psalms 144:1
    Praise be my Lord my Rock,
    He trains my hands for war, my fingers for battle !

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Albuquerque
    Posts
    166
    Quote Originally Posted by sanjuro_ronin View Post
    Boxers are taught to go in, hit hard and often and get out BECAUSE it is assumed that the other guys is gonna hit back and hit back hard.
    WC does NOT advocate the "get in, hit and get out" strategy and this is quite plain in chain striking IMO.
    I'd agree with that. The controlling hands half of chain punching demonstrated in the videos are the WC answer to the problem of the other guy hitting back.

    Good controlling hands are pretty hard to do in reality.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    22,250
    Quote Originally Posted by WingChunABQ View Post
    I'd agree with that. The controlling hands half of chain punching demonstrated in the videos are the WC answer to the problem of the other guy hitting back.

    Good controlling hands are pretty hard to do in reality.
    And that really is the jist of it, in reality it is very hard to control the hands/arms of an opponent that is hitting us, especially of we are hitting ( trying to) hit him at the same time.
    And this "same timeing" happens a lot in a real fight.
    Psalms 144:1
    Praise be my Lord my Rock,
    He trains my hands for war, my fingers for battle !

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Albuquerque
    Posts
    166
    Yup. Takes a lot of training and practice.

    As for "getting out", there are several examples of the principle in the footwork of the Chum Kiu, Biu Jee and Wooden Dummy forms.

  8. #23
    Quote Originally Posted by sanjuro_ronin View Post
    I think we may be talking a bit past each other or maybe about different things...allow me to clarify:
    To repeat this part because it is crucial:
    Boxers are taught to go in, hit hard and often and get out BECAUSE it is assumed that the other guys is gonna hit back and hit back hard.
    WC does NOT advocate the "get in, hit and get out" strategy and this is quite plain in chain striking IMO.

    I don't recall any WC principle that advocates going in, hitting and getting out.
    Do you?
    ----------------------------------------------
    Boxing strategy -of get in, hit and get out is different from wc strategy of both hands and both side working together (north paw/ south paw ambidextrous work) and controlling. Wing chun takes longer to learn than boxing. Although in old boxing hip throws were known- with the evolution of boxing rules it's primarily a striking art-
    with the referee stopping throwing, grabbing, etc-the wing chun tool box is full of contoling tools. IMO and practice.Striking is only part of the wing chun game in my pov FWIW. Other povs can vary

    PS I understood Alan's good distinction between a good punch and one where the elbow goes straight up losing power.


    joy chaudhuri.
    Last edited by Vajramusti; 02-23-2012 at 02:19 PM.

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Toronto, canada
    Posts
    964
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by sanjuro_ronin View Post
    Boxers are taught to go in, hit hard and often and get out BECAUSE it is assumed that the other guys is gonna hit back and hit back hard.
    Although this is all true, In boxing one is also taught how to use angles and ring generalship. In fact Angles work off anticipating the opponent is going to hit back.

    Quote Originally Posted by sanjuro_ronin View Post
    WC does NOT advocate the "get in, hit and get out" strategy and this is quite plain in chain striking IMO.
    I agree, that's because WC works best in between clinching and boxing range, and prefers to fight in close. where as boxing uses the stick and move strategy which is more suited to long range fighters.

    The wooden dummy techniques is a better example of how wing chun should function than chain punching in my opinion.


    Quote Originally Posted by sanjuro_ronin View Post
    I don't recall any WC principle that advocates going in, hitting and getting out. Do you?
    I agree in empty hands fighting, the exception probably being when fighting with baat jam do or pole and you have to regroup.
    Last edited by kung fu fighter; 02-23-2012 at 06:10 PM.

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    St.Louis Missouri
    Posts
    2,175
    The Video is nice one from a boxing stand point...But chain punching in a static Posistion is unrealistic.

    In Wing Chun we desire to end the fight quickly. Wing Chun is not an art about sticking and moving or slugging it out toe to toe with a guy to see who has the strongest chin. Wing Chun is about Controlling your opponent structure,elbow, centerline and posture. It's about sticking or forward pressure to continously attack your opponent like a swarm of bees. Its about Continously attacking and hitting a guy until he is no more. No stick and move...Just stick and attack constantly...

    there are various techniques in WC that utilize different aspects to control the opponent. There are also various basic Techniques that train power or the utilization of power in different facets...

    Such as:

    1.The Meridan Punch generates it power from YGKYM while facing the opponent. It uses the curl to issue force.

    2.The Dragon punch is lauch from the YGKYM while turning the body or shifting the stance. In other words you use your waist to generate power. The power is generated and issued by way of Cho Ma.

    3.The Arrow Punch is launched from the ding ma or forward stance. The Arrow Punch uses chasing steps or shooting steps to transfer power from the body. Your body weight adds more power to your punch as you front step either to keep up or to dart in. Its power comes from Toh Ma or Biu ma. You can combine Dragon Punch and Toh Ma for even greater power. An of course Biu ma allows for you to generate even more power since your body structure is being launched with greater velocity.

    4.Chain Punch is different. It is practiced and drilled in YGKYM at first. In the air you can learn how to do three star chain punch and continous chain punch non-stop. Both have various applications I wont go into. But with the continous chain punch...One needs timing and senstivity to get it off properly. You dont just start chain punching for no reason. You have to either create an opening or feel for one. Creating Openings should be taught in san shou drills and also bridging the gap drills. Feeling for openings should be taught in chi sau which is the way you develop sensitivity in my wing chun. Gor sau is how you intergrate, innovate and culminate the skills, principles and theories learn from the system. Everything from the forms, drills, and chi sau should be intergrated into applicable fighting unit. If you lack Sensitivity how can you adapt to your opponents attack or counter attack. If you just go blinding running across the room chain punching in the air do expect your opponent to stand there an wait to be hit. You have apply chain punch when he doesn't realize it is coming. Basic Techniques like Pak Da or Lop Dap or Jut Da give you the distraction you need to create an opening to utilize continous linked attacks. Once you utilize a meridan punch or arrow punch to gain entry or you damage your opponents structure you can launch the dreaded chain punches...The chain punch is not as powerful as the arrow punch or meridan punch, But it is faster than they are.




    To build up your chain punch you can utilize a wall bag and a heavy bag to cultivate more power. In addition to that you can use wrist weights or dumb bells to develop more speed in power...Doing chain punch in the air slowly, medium and fast with weights will give you greater impact. Explosive push ups are also great in addition to other forms of push ups respective lineages may have. One should train every part of the punch indiviually and then all together. Such as the wrist, the Arm, The waist and the hips and the root.


    If your chain punch is so weak that an opponent can launch a hook or an upper cut you need to work on basics first...If you are consecutively sticking and chain punching your opponent shouldnt be able to do anything but fall. The idea is to overwhelm him with precision strikes to his weak points to destroy his structure, control his centerline and make him no more. Punch when you should. Don't Punch when you shouldn't. You should have sensitivy and know when to strike. Your strickes should be precise and accurate. When you chain punch you apply Toh Ma and Biu Ma to generate power power with your chain punch. The speed is from the chain punch, the power is from Biu Ma. Your weight transfers behind your punches and your structure carries your power.

    -Also One Should develop Skill-

    If you have all techninque and principles but No skill your WC will be weak...The following is what makes up your skill level and makes you a better fighter...

    1.Endurance
    2.Stamina
    3.Strength
    4.Flexibility
    5.Power
    6.Speed
    7.Coordination
    8.Agility
    9.Accuracy
    10.Balance
    11.Timing
    12.Sensitivity
    Last edited by Yoshiyahu; 02-23-2012 at 11:49 PM.
    The Flow is relentless like a raging ocean with crashing waves devasting anything in its path.

    "Kick Like Thunder, Strike Like Lighting, Fist Hard as Stones."

    "Wing Chun flows around overwhelming force and finds openings with its constant flow of forward energy."

    "Always Attack, Be Aggressive always Attack first, Be Relentless. Continue with out ceasing. Flow Like Water, Move like the wind, Attack Like Fire. Consume and overwhelm your Adversary until he is No More"

  11. #26
    Quote Originally Posted by kung fu fighter View Post
    It depends on your angle!
    I agree angles are effective and important, the following was plucked from Augustine Fong's Website, this is something that we are already know however I will post it for emphasis.

    "Do not collide with a strong opponent.

    A strong opponent's defense cannot by easily blasted through; consequently you should not attack or contact the opponent's power straight on. When faced with strong power do no go against it. Instead go around the direction of the power to attack at an angle so that you are not colliding with the strong position. The feeling of when to go in and when to go around is developed through wing chun sticky hands practice. This principle is also for timing so that when you feel strong power, that is not the time to attack directly but to go around. "
    Source: http://www.fongswingchun.com/FIGHTING.pdf

    If you have the ability to knock out every opponent with ever shot then you are a rare case. In reality there are those who can and can not take a well placed hit. For those who can, it is obvious that they will counter and this is the whole point of training chi sao, gor sao then graduating to sparing in wing chun. It is in those exercises that you can develop "your" ability to link/chain your attack while simultaneously trying to defend. And by defend I mean to either avoid trading hits or making it an "uneven trade". Angle's not only help you with defense (as phil would say using the blind side) but they also help with offense. Speed and timing are a must. What you can't do with one hit you must do with more than one. There are not absolutes in wing chun or fighting in general. In any case that is my opinion, again great video Alan, keep them coming.
    Last edited by nasmedicine; 02-23-2012 at 10:32 PM.
    Fut Hong Wing Chun Kuen (a.k.a. Invisible Buddha Fist Wing Chun), Northern New Jersey
    IBFWC @ youtube
    BBL28888 @ youtube


    "Everybody's gotta plan, until they get hit!" - Mike Tyson

    "Rule number 1: Don't get hit. Rule number 2: Remember rule number one."- Sifu Joseph Ng

    "Pure or Impure Wing Chun, whatever beats an opponent is good Wing Chun" - pg 50, Wing Chun Warrior: The True Tales of WCKF Master Duncan Leung

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    North London, England
    Posts
    3,003
    Quote Originally Posted by Alan Orr View Post
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=ZnIVhighInU

    Filmed a load of clips this week.

    This one is on chain punching.

    best Alan
    FWIW I thought the best part of Alans clip was when he mentions the practicality in function of chained strikes being akin to the speedball training of a boxer. Learning static drills of lien wan kuen to develop a habit is one thing, and being able to apply this method in the thick of it is another. I agree 100%

    But I will add that there seems to be confusion about the language implication with this sort of fistwork. Not so much from Alan, but from some of the posts here. 'Lien Wan Kuen' implies that the fists are linked and revolving continuously, More of a 'stunning' method for fast hands. If, like Alan, you are well versed enough to react to an aggressive fighter and continue to link up these fists you are doing something right but this isn't 'only' Lien Wan because there is an element of receiving and giving pressure too. FME and learning we referred to this method as Seep Dai and this is exactly what Alan acheives here, continuing to express his Lien Wan fist work while receiving continuous attacks in different ways.

    This is called Seep Dai Lien Wan Kuen.

    So to be clear on the 'power' thing. If you are charging through the defense continuously, with pretty much no regard for what's coming back atcha, this is called Lien Wan Chong Kuen. If you are stop/starting (but still quite continous) like in the clip you ar doing Seep Dai Lien Wan Kuen.

    Both are simple ways of expressing the Wing Chun Fist, and both are present in Alans clip just not the only methods available to us, as (I think) Yoshi was also trying to explain.
    Last edited by LoneTiger108; 02-24-2012 at 04:47 AM.
    Ti Fei
    詠春國術

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,655
    Hi Spencer, do you have the characters for 'seep dai' at hand? I can't think of what they could be from your description.

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    North London, England
    Posts
    3,003
    Quote Originally Posted by CFT View Post
    Hi Spencer, do you have the characters for 'seep dai' at hand? I can't think of what they could be from your description.
    Now that would be 'sharing too much' lol! I will see when I get home...
    Ti Fei
    詠春國術

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,655
    Really?!! TIA.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •