Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 49

Thread: hard and soft explained

  1. #16
    Again,

    Both methods described by bawang are hard.


    mickey

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canada!
    Posts
    23,110
    Wrapping mystical BS around something as simple as punching someone in the face is for people who like to talk about martial arts.

    Hard and soft are topics for rumination etc.
    They have no value when you are in the soup.

    Concepts? no. hard is hard, soft is soft.

    all fighters should be relaxed and mobile. period. If you aren't relaxed and maintaining mobility, you're gonna lose your fight probably.

    such esoterica is losing it's place rapidly. there are much clearer explanations and there is no need to visit a table that holds no nourishment.
    Kung Fu is good for you.

  3. #18
    Hard and soft hand are just a convenient way to group methods binominally.

    The fun part is that when you mix and mesh them.

    There are hard hands in your soft hands.

    There are also soft hands in your hard hands.

    gang zhong you ruo.

    ruo zhong you gang.

    In mantis

    You may deliver a straight punch when there is an opening. zhi tong er ru shou. straight stab to enter your hand.

    Facing that you may rotate your forearm to deflect it. or gun shou.

    The first hand method is hard hand.

    The second hand method is soft hand.

    etc etc

    In Tai Chi

    ----


  4. #19
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Shell Beach, CA, USA
    Posts
    6,664
    Blog Entries
    16
    To me, hard is used in offense and soft is used in defense. There is no such thing as soft offense that you can "soft" your opponent to death.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canada!
    Posts
    23,110
    Quote Originally Posted by YouKnowWho View Post
    To me, hard is used in offense and soft is used in defense. There is no such thing as soft offense that you can "soft" your opponent to death.
    smothering someone to death with a pillow while they sleep could be considered a soft attack.

    But it's not Kung Fu.
    Kung Fu is good for you.

  6. #21
    Quote Originally Posted by David Jamieson View Post
    smothering someone to death with a pillow while they sleep could be considered a soft attack.

    But it's not Kung Fu.
    It might be if you did it with style, a pre and post smother flourish, and a Bruce Lee cat call!

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canada!
    Posts
    23,110
    ok, one leg up and over the head whilst murdering your sleeping victim. But no cat call, because you don't want to wake them up...

    softly now...
    Kung Fu is good for you.

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Pound Town
    Posts
    7,861
    this is not a discussion. i told you guys what hard and soft means. i command you to accept it.

    Honorary African American
    grandmaster instructor of Wombat Combat The Lost Art of Anal Destruction™®LLC .
    Senior Business Director at TEAM ASSHAMMER consulting services ™®LLC

  9. #24
    Quote Originally Posted by bawang View Post
    this is not a discussion. i told you guys what hard and soft means. i command you to accept it.
    "So let it me written, so let it be done!"

    Maybe!

  10. #25
    Quote Originally Posted by YouKnowWho View Post
    To me, hard is used in offense and soft is used in defense. There is no such thing as soft offense that you can "soft" your opponent to death.
    Oh yeah?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I6Ffr1U7KMY

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Midgard
    Posts
    10,852
    Quote Originally Posted by David Jamieson View Post
    smothering someone to death with a pillow while they sleep could be considered a soft attack.

    But it's not Kung Fu.
    what if im really really good at it though? like if i smother people sleeping with pillow so much that ive cut my time in half and gotten the awaken rate down by 80% in the last 25 times? i think i have good 'smothering sleeping people with pillows' kungfu
    For whoso comes amongst many shall one day find that no one man is by so far the mightiest of all.

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Pound Town
    Posts
    7,861
    i think choy lee fut has a pillow form

    Honorary African American
    grandmaster instructor of Wombat Combat The Lost Art of Anal Destruction™®LLC .
    Senior Business Director at TEAM ASSHAMMER consulting services ™®LLC

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Western MA
    Posts
    953
    To me: Hard = collision, soft = redirection.

    Strikes are virtually always hard...blocks, throws, locks can all be hard, soft, or often some combination of the two.

    By extrapolation, strategy can also be hard or soft...direct vs. indirect.

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Shell Beach, CA, USA
    Posts
    6,664
    Blog Entries
    16
    Quote Originally Posted by ShaolinDan View Post
    soft = redirection.
    Unless you can "redirect" your opponent off the cliff or into heavy traffic, otherwise I don't see any way that you can finish a fight with it. May be you can drag your opponent down to the ground and choke him to death, but I don't think that's TCMA true definition of "soft".

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Western MA
    Posts
    953
    Quote Originally Posted by YouKnowWho View Post
    Unless you can "redirect" your opponent off the cliff or into heavy traffic, otherwise I don't see any way that you can finish a fight with it. May be you can drag your opponent down to the ground and choke him to death, but I don't think that's TCMA true definition of "soft".
    You can crash your hips to take someone's balance, you can also move with someone to take his balance. Either way they can hit the ground hard...but the contact between you and them is different.

    You can strike someone's limb with a hard block, or stick to it to grapple using a soft block.

    So this is not the true definition of TCMA 'soft?' Hmm...what about other MA's, they also use these terms?

    This is like internal/external to me. Maybe these terms mean something more esoteric in some styles/schools than others. I've always been taught that these are descriptive terms on a spectrum, not digital opposites. There's no mystery, it's something you can just feel.

    I don't really feel it's much different than speaking of whether one's footwork is 'heavy' or 'light.'
    Last edited by ShaolinDan; 04-10-2012 at 10:16 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •