Thoughts on the techniques here?
http://www.wingchuntaoist.com/2012/0...lass-demo.html
Thoughts on the techniques here?
http://www.wingchuntaoist.com/2012/0...lass-demo.html
A clever man learns from his mistakes but a truly wise man learns from the mistakes of others.
Wing Chun kung fu in Redditch
Worcestershire Wing Chun Kuen on facebook
It is not up to me to comment what's right or wrong, just suggesting how one can test their structures.
but hanging a kettle bell on your wrist is not a test of structure. By definition gravity will pull the kettle bell straight down. If you feel a downwards pressure at your wrist you should simply let it go and so applying this logic you would just keep dropping the kettle bell. Testing structure is fine but only if it is tested in the direction in which it is intended to be strong.
A clever man learns from his mistakes but a truly wise man learns from the mistakes of others.
Wing Chun kung fu in Redditch
Worcestershire Wing Chun Kuen on facebook
IMO, The more distal you go on the arm (wrist) the weaker the structure is. If you can master the weakest point then everything else falls into place, IMO. This only gives you something to start out with, later apply what you came out of that exercise with to your push hand/chi sao/gor sao/grappling...etc. Same can be come in the opposite direction at the wrist.
Last edited by nasmedicine; 06-26-2012 at 07:28 PM.
Fut Hong Wing Chun Kuen (a.k.a. Invisible Buddha Fist Wing Chun), Northern New Jersey
IBFWC @ youtube
BBL28888 @ youtube
"Everybody's gotta plan, until they get hit!" - Mike Tyson
"Rule number 1: Don't get hit. Rule number 2: Remember rule number one."- Sifu Joseph Ng
"Pure or Impure Wing Chun, whatever beats an opponent is good Wing Chun" - pg 50, Wing Chun Warrior: The True Tales of WCKF Master Duncan Leung
I'm actually starting to form an opinion that watching one-step punch and response videos makes you slightly stupider every time you see one.
To me the bong sau he's showing is a whole lot longer of a movement than the punch coming in that he's trying to deal with. As such it's not real appealing from an efficiency standpoint. From my experience, movements like that degrade with live action - not very effective.
This is one of the main problems with these guys, they try to explain why something works and don't know the real reasons themselves, so everybody get more confused when doesn't work.
Cheers
When techniques and principles are developed in a practical way ( under pressure) BUT are not trained that way, something gets lost in the translation.
Returning to the old ways may not be such a bad thing for many so-called traditionalists.
And by old way I mean how the developers of WC did it: Pressure testing.
Psalms 144:1
Praise be my Lord my Rock,
He trains my hands for war, my fingers for battle !
What chi sau is, or isn't, or is, or wait, what is it..: http://ezine.kungfumagazine.com/foru...2&postcount=90
My teacher told me a while back "A lot of B.S. seems plausible once you remove speed and intent out of the equation!". I see this again and again with what many so called "Masters" teach.
Sad...
Dio perdona... Io no!
Lol, because getting out of the way is always such a bad idea!
FWIW he changes the centreline by turning (others call it shifting) he doesn't give up the centreline at any point, he actually takes control of it. Draw a line connecting the jic seen of them both and then play the clip through following that line and look again to see who has control of it
A clever man learns from his mistakes but a truly wise man learns from the mistakes of others.
Wing Chun kung fu in Redditch
Worcestershire Wing Chun Kuen on facebook