Last edited by YouKnowWho; 11-19-2012 at 04:42 PM.
http://johnswang.com
More opinion -> more argument
Less opinion -> less argument
No opinion -> no argument
One really good technique can get you by.
But the time you run across the person that has mastered how to shut down that technique, you will be in trouble.
Best to have a few in which you are expert.
Then you can use strategy in addition to technique.
The girl in the video won not so much because of her one technique. More so that she was more aggressive.
Brendan Lai sometimes would say, "Technique can be matched against technique, but nothing can match speed."
One way of thinking of this is not in absolute speed, but in being faster than the opponent can adapt.
Strategy is part of this.
one of my students in Wombat Combat™
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XBTPjhImt2A
Honorary African American
grandmaster instructor of Wombat Combat The Lost Art of Anal Destruction™®LLC .
Senior Business Director at TEAM ASSHAMMER consulting services ™®LLC
I think training a small set of high percentage techniques is most likely the best way to learn self defence quickly. That being said, if you want to step it up beyond simple street defence you need to diversify. If you know a smaller set of techniques, the odds are that it will be enough. But for those who want more security, it takes more.
Sports are a bit different. But when you get higher up, you really need to put more into your bag. There are very few one trick ponies that last a long time on top.
Its' not really about how many techniques you know, though having more than 1 is a good idea.
It is about how much you have exposed your techniques to.
If you have mastered 8 techniques and have exposed them to all manner of situations and environments vs the bets trained you can find, then you will be able to pull those techniques off against pretty much anything anyone can throw at you.
Psalms 144:1
Praise be my Lord my Rock,
He trains my hands for war, my fingers for battle !
http://johnswang.com
More opinion -> more argument
Less opinion -> less argument
No opinion -> no argument