Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 39

Thread: Decision on Kung Fu Schools - New student

  1. #1

    Question Decision on Kung Fu Schools - New student

    So i'm new to the site, Kung Fu and martial arts in general. This past summer I spent a good month in China, and a few days at the Shaolin Temple and International Shaolin Kung Fu Academy outside of Luoyang. Watching, seeing and semi-participating I became fascinated with the art; philosophy and discipline. I promised my self I would take up Kung Fu once time freed up at home. As for my self, i'm in my mid 20's, pretty fit and have my own business, so i'm quit busy but looking to supplement some time at night, and even change my gym routine up to something different.

    So that time has come, and in the past few weeks I have been visiting several Kung Fu schools in the area (Long Island/Queens.) Unfortunately there aren't many. From the three I visited, 2 seemed based solely upon self defense and application of the art in the real world. But, i'm not one to be a fighter, I dont pick fights, I have never been in a fight, and i'm not quit sure that's exactly what I want; though it seems cool to know. I already knocked 1 out of the 3 schools out. I'm having a hard time deciding really between the other two located in Flushing NY.

    So to start with the first; it was based on Shaolin Kung Fu, fundamentals I saw in china. Practicality, I don't know yet; as far as applications I haven't seen enough either. But in an hour class, I broke a nasty sweat and used muscles I never even knew existed before. I could barely walk the next day... And i'm used to going to the gym, running 3-5 times a week. The unfortunate part was the mix of very few adults, some kids and a few immature teenagers; as well as the language barrier. It was very hard to communicate with the Sifu; (who did study at the Shaolin temple in China) some of the students had to translate for me; though when I wasn't doing things right, he physically moved me. As a traditionalist, this school had no belts; and no fee's for testing which is a plus.

    The second school, the Sifu was very pleasant, knowledgeable in traditional Kung Fu, and has been practicing for over 20 years. I was able to easily speak with him, and understand all the physical movements and application. He also helped translate how one movement can be seen as a grab or punch. But from other friends in Martial Arts for years, they mention these are things you don't or shouldn't need to know until you master then basic fundamentals which can take months or even years. The class was 3 hours though, it was a lot of information to take in at once. However in 3 hours, I didn't break a sweat. A few stretches, a few movements, punches on a bag etc... Movements were tough but other students took their time and helped me. Some of the skilled students practiced weaponry towards the end which was pretty cool to see. But watching people of different belts; it seemed there wasn't much fluid motion to a lot of the movements; a lot of staggering, though some of these guys did know how to defend themselves. All adults in this class which was comfortable as well.


    So to sum it up; I'm stuck between deciding on two classes which seem to be two different styles of Kung Fu from movements to philosphy. More then anything i'm looking to hear peoples advise and experience in what they trained/mastered in; expectations etc... I'm looking at the long haul here.

    Thanks in advanced.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Fremont, CA, U.S.A.
    Posts
    48,036

    Can't take them both?

    Never mind what we think - what feels better to you? What works better in your schedule? Which one will you be able to practice more?
    Gene Ching
    Publisher www.KungFuMagazine.com
    Author of Shaolin Trips
    Support our forum by getting your gear at MartialArtSmart

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    36th Chamber
    Posts
    12,423
    The one with the hotter chicks is always the best. Pretty girls hate losers.
    He most honors my style who learns under it to destroy the teacher. -- Walt Whitman

    Quote Originally Posted by David Jamieson View Post
    As a mod, I don't have to explain myself to you.

  4. #4

    Thumbs up

    Quote Originally Posted by MasterKiller View Post
    The one with the hotter chicks is always the best. Pretty girls hate losers.
    I 2nd this!

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by MasterKiller View Post
    The one with the hotter chicks is always the best. Pretty girls hate losers.
    This would have been my first go to point, but unfortunately neither have Chics. So now I'm back to square one.

    As per comfort level, I wouldn't know. In a single day of trials they both seemed pretty easy, Shaolin was a bit more of a challenge which i liked but this was also the class that seemed to show less application.

    But again, looking to hear others stories, experiences etc... Trying to keep an open mind. If I had the money, and time I would do both!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Shell Beach, CA, USA
    Posts
    6,664
    Blog Entries
    16
    Quote Originally Posted by mjwny View Post
    He also helped translate how one movement can be seen as a grab or punch.
    When someone gives explanation like that, there may be some problem there.

    A

    - grab cannot be a punch, and a punch cannot be a grab.
    - step cannot be a kick, and a kick cannot be a step.
    - hip throw cannot be a shoulder throw, and a shoulder throw cannot be a hip throw.

    When a teacher tried to map a form move into application, he is taking the wrong path in the 1st place.
    Last edited by YouKnowWho; 12-18-2012 at 06:33 PM.
    http://johnswang.com

    More opinion -> more argument
    Less opinion -> less argument
    No opinion -> no argument

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by YouKnowWho View Post
    When someone gives explanation like that, there may be some problem there.

    A

    - grab cannot be a punch, and a punch cannot be a grab.
    - step cannot be a kick, and a kick cannot be a step.
    - hip throw cannot be a shoulder throw, and a shoulder throw cannot be a hip throw.

    When a teacher tried to map a form move into application, he is taking the wrong path in the 1st place.
    Exactly the kind of feedback i'm looking for, thank you. Now, as I have no experience, so please dont mind my ignorance but after learning forms for lets say.. a year, aren't they eventually put into application of some sort?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Shell Beach, CA, USA
    Posts
    6,664
    Blog Entries
    16
    You will need many tools in combat. A teacher should

    - help you to develop one tool after another tool,
    - not help you to learn one form after another form.
    Last edited by YouKnowWho; 12-18-2012 at 08:08 PM.
    http://johnswang.com

    More opinion -> more argument
    Less opinion -> less argument
    No opinion -> no argument

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by mjwny View Post
    Exactly the kind of feedback i'm looking for, thank you. Now, as I have no experience, so please dont mind my ignorance but after learning forms for lets say.. a year, aren't they eventually put into application of some sort?
    They should be put into application almost immediately. You should be learning applications as you learn the form, then trying them out with partners. It's not a bad thing to learn the applications before the form.

    Don't be afraid to ask for it. Some guys will just keep going with the form if no one shows interest in application. I always questioned any app that wasn't obvious.
    Last edited by Kellen Bassette; 12-18-2012 at 08:43 PM. Reason: wanted to

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Shell Beach, CA, USA
    Posts
    6,664
    Blog Entries
    16
    The 1st day that I met my longfist teacher, I was only 14 years old, I asked him, "What will you do if I punch at your face?" He said, "Come and punch me." When I punched him, he pulled my arm into him, used his foot to block my leading leg, and threw me forward. For the remaining years, in his mind, I was always a bad boy who cared nothing but fighting.

    Today, I'm a teacher myself. I only teacher students who "cares nothing but fighting". A bad teacher always teaches bad students.
    Last edited by YouKnowWho; 12-19-2012 at 06:01 PM.
    http://johnswang.com

    More opinion -> more argument
    Less opinion -> less argument
    No opinion -> no argument

  11. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by YouKnowWho View Post
    The 1st day that I met my longfist teacher, I was only 14 years old, I asked him, "What will you do if I punch at your face?" He said, "Come and punch me." When I punched him, he pulled my arm into him, used his foot to block my leading leg, and thrown me forward. For the remaining years, in his mind, I was alway a bad boy who cares only fighting.
    Yeah exactly don't do that to your sifu lol. But at that age a child hardly knows the boundaries of rudeness.

  12. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by mjwny View Post
    So i'm new to the site, Kung Fu and martial arts in general. This past summer I spent a good month in China, and a few days at the Shaolin Temple and International Shaolin Kung Fu Academy outside of Luoyang. Watching, seeing and semi-participating I became fascinated with the art; philosophy and discipline. I promised my self I would take up Kung Fu once time freed up at home. As for my self, i'm in my mid 20's, pretty fit and have my own business, so i'm quit busy but looking to supplement some time at night, and even change my gym routine up to something different.

    So that time has come, and in the past few weeks I have been visiting several Kung Fu schools in the area (Long Island/Queens.) Unfortunately there aren't many. From the three I visited, 2 seemed based solely upon self defense and application of the art in the real world. But, i'm not one to be a fighter, I dont pick fights, I have never been in a fight, and i'm not quit sure that's exactly what I want; though it seems cool to know. I already knocked 1 out of the 3 schools out. I'm having a hard time deciding really between the other two located in Flushing NY.

    So to start with the first; it was based on Shaolin Kung Fu, fundamentals I saw in china. Practicality, I don't know yet; as far as applications I haven't seen enough either. But in an hour class, I broke a nasty sweat and used muscles I never even knew existed before. I could barely walk the next day... And i'm used to going to the gym, running 3-5 times a week. The unfortunate part was the mix of very few adults, some kids and a few immature teenagers; as well as the language barrier. It was very hard to communicate with the Sifu; (who did study at the Shaolin temple in China) some of the students had to translate for me; though when I wasn't doing things right, he physically moved me. As a traditionalist, this school had no belts; and no fee's for testing which is a plus.

    The second school, the Sifu was very pleasant, knowledgeable in traditional Kung Fu, and has been practicing for over 20 years. I was able to easily speak with him, and understand all the physical movements and application. He also helped translate how one movement can be seen as a grab or punch. But from other friends in Martial Arts for years, they mention these are things you don't or shouldn't need to know until you master then basic fundamentals which can take months or even years. The class was 3 hours though, it was a lot of information to take in at once. However in 3 hours, I didn't break a sweat. A few stretches, a few movements, punches on a bag etc... Movements were tough but other students took their time and helped me. Some of the skilled students practiced weaponry towards the end which was pretty cool to see. But watching people of different belts; it seemed there wasn't much fluid motion to a lot of the movements; a lot of staggering, though some of these guys did know how to defend themselves. All adults in this class which was comfortable as well.


    So to sum it up; I'm stuck between deciding on two classes which seem to be two different styles of Kung Fu from movements to philosphy. More then anything i'm looking to hear peoples advise and experience in what they trained/mastered in; expectations etc... I'm looking at the long haul here.

    Thanks in advanced.
    First of all, welcome friend. Maybe you should ask the first sifu if there is an adults only class? I believe I know of that sifu if he is who I think he is, not personally. Secondly do what you prefer, is one class easier to get to, fits in your schedule better, more relaxed/intense, everyone treated equally or by rank etc. Ask yourself these questions and more or if you really like both try both or even be enrolled in both if you can, Most sifu these days don't really mind you taking another class.

  13. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by Kellen Bassette View Post
    They should be put into application almost immediately. You should be learning applications as you learn the form, then trying them out with partners. It's not a bad thing to learn the applications before the form.

    Don't be afraid to ask for it. Some guys will just keep going with the form if no one shows interest in application. I always questioned any app that wasn't obvious.
    Is this dependent on the principals of the Sifu? I mentioned this because the first class I attended had said in their adult fundamentals classes they teach you basic forms and movements, really teach your body to be flexible and understand the principals; once you pass your first test they then teach you application.

    Quote Originally Posted by YouKnowWho View Post
    The 1st day that I met my longfist teacher, I was only 14 years old, I asked him, "What will you do if I punch at your face?" He said, "Come and punch me." When I punched him, he pulled my arm into him, used his foot to block my leading leg, and threw me forward. For the remaining years, in his mind, I was always a bad boy who cared nothing but fighting.

    Today, I'm a teacher myself. I only teacher students who "cares nothing but fighting".
    I found this true to be more-so with the second class I tried out. Showing how to counter the moves - but again moves that were application of basic forms taught not much earlier.

    I didn't get a chance to see any application in the first class.

    Quote Originally Posted by Raipizo View Post
    First of all, welcome friend. Maybe you should ask the first sifu if there is an adults only class? I believe I know of that sifu if he is who I think he is, not personally. Secondly do what you prefer, is one class easier to get to, fits in your schedule better, more relaxed/intense, everyone treated equally or by rank etc. Ask yourself these questions and more or if you really like both try both or even be enrolled in both if you can, Most sifu these days don't really mind you taking another class.
    Thank you Raipizo. If you know him, can you PM me; I have a few questions; I wouldn't want to toss out names here in public; as I dont want to disrespect anyone.

    The first sifu, was an adult class, they happen to mix in some teenagers. Their children classes seem to be 5-10 give or take. Both classes happen to be around the block from each other and have very similar schedules - but given so, the second class's 3 hour timeframe is a bit long. However both classes had much equality between ranks and age. I really considered doing both, but again together it's a bit expensive considering they require 3 months minimum. The second class was pretty adamant about doing things their way and not confusing it with other forms.

    Thank's all for the input so far.

  14. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by mjwny View Post
    Is this dependent on the principals of the Sifu? I mentioned this because the first class I attended had said in their adult fundamentals classes they teach you basic forms and movements, really teach your body to be flexible and understand the principals; once you pass your first test they then teach you application.

    Different sifus have different ways of teaching. For instance some will have one class where they touch on everything...others may have a class where they do basics, self defense and forms and a different class for sanda,where they condition and spar. Others may just teach you forms and basics and not much else.

    The important thing is that you are getting the applications and a chance to practice them...whether he does that while he's teaching a form or after he feels you have it down. That is, if your interested in self defense. If your only interested in the art/performance aspects of forms; or just want a different work out, then the apps may not matter to you at all.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Pound Town
    Posts
    7,856
    Quote Originally Posted by mjwny View Post


    So to sum it up; I'm stuck between deciding on two classes which seem to be two different styles of Kung Fu from movements to philosphy. More then anything i'm looking to hear peoples advise and experience in what they trained/mastered in; expectations etc... I'm looking at the long haul here.

    Thanks in advanced.
    hi

    buy a dvd/learn from youtube

    Honorary African American
    grandmaster instructor of Wombat Combat The Lost Art of Anal Destruction™®LLC .
    Senior Business Director at TEAM ASSHAMMER consulting services ™®LLC

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •