Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 46

Thread: The shape of combat

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canada!
    Posts
    23,110
    Quote Originally Posted by sanjuro_ronin View Post
    Indeed, don't argue with that.
    My point is that the shape of combat is based on how ones trains full contact ( or at least hard contact).
    Your point is totally valid. Full contact has people revise what they thought was good positioning, good entering strategy etc. It's when the pressure of reality is revealed that we start to make our adjustments in style to that reality.

    Fighting will change the shape of an "art" by recognizing the requirements of function vs the requirements of training strength and conditioning.
    Kung Fu is good for you.

  2. #32
    the shape matches whatever's most efficient to you. Is this effected by how you train? Absolutely, but it all comes down to what works when you need it to work. It has very little to do with what you wished or hoped would work.

  3. #33
    as a judge for many years I see this transformation often. I see a person play a form you can tell right away where its from even what part of the region. then say they do push hands, then possibly fight, if there qualifying in all events.

    I see the precision concentration in the form and proper body mechanics and weight shifts in the push hands, then I see it go out the window when it comes time to fight. this is a common problem

    flip side, fighting only I have judged many MMA fights you cant tell what style they do which is OK but what you do should be recognizable and are least you should be able to say oh hes a BJJ guy or sambo, wrestler etc etc.
    KUNG FU USA
    www.eightstepkungfu.com
    Teaching traditional Ba Bu Tang Lang (Eight Step Praying Mantis)
    Jin Gon Tzu Li Gung (Medical) Qigong
    Wu style Taiji Chuan



    Teacher always told his students, "You need to have Wude, patient, tolerance, humble, ..." When he died, his last words to his students was, "Remember that the true meaning of TCMA is fierce, poison, and kill."

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Shell Beach, CA, USA
    Posts
    6,664
    Blog Entries
    16
    Quote Originally Posted by JamesC View Post
    For me, everything starts with basic boxing.
    You don't have to always start from the basic boxing. You try to skip that step if your opponent is a good striker. You can start from "grip fight". The "grip fight" is different from the "fist fight". You give up your striking opportunity by trying to disable your opponent's striking ability at the same time.

    Quote Originally Posted by sanjuro_ronin View Post
    Combat looks like how you train for it. If you train full contact ...
    This is why it makes no sense for a grappler to exchange punches with a boxer. The grappler just doesn't train that way.

    Not sure what "full contact" may mean in the grappling game.
    Last edited by YouKnowWho; 02-04-2013 at 11:25 AM.
    http://johnswang.com

    More opinion -> more argument
    Less opinion -> less argument
    No opinion -> no argument

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Outer Beringia
    Posts
    892
    Quote Originally Posted by JamesC View Post
    As for the waist power, again, I agree with you.

    Why do you think that is? It's almost like they're glossin over the basic components that make an effective style. This isn't the case in every school, of course, but it does seem to run rampant in kenpo especially. So you see these guys doing these techs, but they are all hands and arms with no power. Again, I benefit from past experience. Waist power is especially important in okinawan karate do.

    Perhaps there is this tendency to shy away from traditional methods in an attempt to adopt more modern forms such as boxing without proper training?
    I suspect the disconnect happened because Hawaiian Kenpo was originally Okinawa Karatedo, although Mitose tried to cover its origins. Later Chow and others tried to give it a Chinese base without really learning TCMA. So it was something incompletely distorted into something else without regard to the power concepts needed to make it work. Fortunately, some branches have evolved since those days.
    "Look, I'm only doing me job. I have to show you how to defend yourself against fresh fruit."

    For it breeds great perfection, if the practise be harder then the use. Sir Francis Bacon

    the world has a surplus of self centered sh1twh0res, so anyone who extends compassion to a stranger with sincerity is alright in my book. also people who fondle road kill. those guys is ok too. GunnedDownAtrocity

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    2,111
    Quote Originally Posted by Frost View Post
    american kempo has no real history of fighting in full contact events, if all you do is soft slap sparring, forms and compliant drills you can get away with not generating power properly (see also wing chun for this problem) that’s the sad truth of it
    There was a lot of point sparring in the 60's and 70's. Basically playing tag.

    Kenpo was pretty good with groin kicks though. One of their favorite targets, and they always went there in sparring.

    A few years ago, a karate school I knew visited their friend's Kenpo school for sparring exchange. All the karate guys got surprised taking kicks to the groin.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    CA, USA
    Posts
    4,900
    Many years ago, I was a Kenpo black belt, and when I was training it, I never liked the self-defense techniques or forms. But when we sparred, we never point-sparred or slap-sparred; it was always kickboxing, but with groin attacks, too. My teacher had a background in both wrestling and boxing, and was very good. I liked the sparring aspect the best. I always felt a disconnect between the techniques and the fighting.

    When I started Kenpo at 13, I thought karate was just karate; I didn't know about styles and whatnot. To me, MA's meant judo and karate back then. I just chose the best school that was closest. It ended up being a very good school, even though I ended up leaving eventually to learn other things. I still respect and am in contact occasionally with my former kenpo teacher.

    I had a book written by Mitose called Kenpo Jujitsu. Though I didn't really understand the jujitsu connection, if any.
    Last edited by Jimbo; 02-04-2013 at 04:20 PM.

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Bondi, Sydney Australia
    Posts
    2,502
    Quote Originally Posted by Frost View Post
    american kempo has no real history of fighting in full contact events, if all you do is soft slap sparring, forms and compliant drills you can get away with not generating power properly (see also wing chun for this problem) that’s the sad truth of it
    I was under the belief that Parker and Dan Pai were Hawaiian street fighters before they put their styles together. Anybody?
    Guangzhou Pak Mei Kung Fu School, Sydney Australia,
    Sifu Leung, Yuk Seng
    Established 1989, Glebe Australia

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    2,111
    Quote Originally Posted by Jimbo View Post
    Many years ago, I was a Kenpo black belt, and when I was training it, I never liked the self-defense techniques or forms. But when we sparred, we never point-sparred or slap-sparred; it was always kickboxing, but with groin attacks, too.
    We had to connect with the groin kicks to make that distinctive pop sound from the other guy's cup. One guy passed out from the pain when he got kicked hard enough to split his groin cup.

    Even our two person forms we had to contact the cup and get that sound. Kenpo seems to love hammerfist to the groin. Like every 3rd strike in a combo was a hammerfist to the groin. Didn't think it was all that great of a move though.

    My first tournament as a kid... I was up against some kung fu guy who did a tornado kick at me. I cleared his first kick and threw my kick up before his second kick came around. He came down right on top of my rising kick and took it right between the legs.
    Last edited by -N-; 02-04-2013 at 10:07 PM.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    4,381
    Quote Originally Posted by Yum Cha View Post
    I was under the belief that Parker and Dan Pai were Hawaiian street fighters before they put their styles together. Anybody?
    it doesnt really matter what the arts founders were, if there's no history of fighting in the following gneerations things get lost quickly

  11. #41
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    22,250
    Quote Originally Posted by Frost View Post
    it doesn't really matter what the arts founders were, if there's no history of fighting in the following generations things get lost quickly
    This and it should be etched in stone in every dojo, dojang, kwoon and gym.
    Psalms 144:1
    Praise be my Lord my Rock,
    He trains my hands for war, my fingers for battle !

  12. #42
    Quote Originally Posted by MightyB View Post
    To me this is the shape of combat

    I will actually second that. I recently began training in sumo. you hit hard, hit fast, strike, push and throw. most matches last less than 60 seconds.
    i'm nobody...i'm nobody. i'm a tramp, a bum, a hobo... a boxcar and a jug of wine... but i'm a straight razor if you get to close to me.

    -Charles Manson

    I will punch, kick, choke, throw or joint manipulate any nationality equally without predjudice.

    - Shonie Carter

  13. #43
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Outer Beringia
    Posts
    892
    Quote Originally Posted by sanjuro_ronin View Post
    Combat looks like how you train for it.
    If you train full contact and are used to the stimuli of actual combat, you will maintain whatever "shape" you consistently train at.
    If you do NOT train that way, your "shape" will be compromised and "fall apart" when under pressure.
    It really is just that simple.
    This is a good observation. In some longfist systems there are two kinds of training the shape of combat. One way is the testing training mentioned above. The other is the form training with more follow-through on the movements and more extension in the postures. The latter training aids balance and power development but it doesn't quite look the same in contact sparring. The techniques are still recognizable but the follow-through is felt rather than seen.

    Which is the "shape" of the art? I say both: one is more abstract for developing power, range and balance, the other for practical use. The practical is the original intent while the abstract form is an adjunct to training.
    "Look, I'm only doing me job. I have to show you how to defend yourself against fresh fruit."

    For it breeds great perfection, if the practise be harder then the use. Sir Francis Bacon

    the world has a surplus of self centered sh1twh0res, so anyone who extends compassion to a stranger with sincerity is alright in my book. also people who fondle road kill. those guys is ok too. GunnedDownAtrocity

  14. #44
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canada!
    Posts
    23,110
    Quote Originally Posted by -N- View Post
    There was a lot of point sparring in the 60's and 70's. Basically playing tag.

    Kenpo was pretty good with groin kicks though. One of their favorite targets, and they always went there in sparring.

    A few years ago, a karate school I knew visited their friend's Kenpo school for sparring exchange. All the karate guys got surprised taking kicks to the groin.
    I don't know what sort of queef huffing you've been doing , but back in the 70's I seem to remember guys beating the living tar out of each other without gloves or with light gloves or kempo gloves etc. Mouthguards and cups and full on blasting away.

    Point sparring was tournament ghey BS that got big in the way late 70's, 80's and 90's when the big influx happened and everyone was doing it...but without insurance. At this time, tough man competitions came out which were the early versions of nhb in North America.

    and so it evolved out that wu shu came into being, nhb started climbing in popularity and traditional started to diminish. By the 90's traditional was in real trouble and ufc was starting to get in the game.

    Right now, it is the teens of the new millennium. UFC is now regarded as the realz and Traditional has schismed hard into those that do and those that dance.

    Traditional schools are faced with bringing in real programs for people who want to fight. Schools lack credibility with the general public if they don't have fighters unless it's tai chi for old people or private esoteric kung fu study etc.

    It will continue to evolve and i think that the sport fighting will continue to get more stylistic like boxing has done.
    Kung Fu is good for you.

  15. #45
    If you can't stay home and find yourself, no use looking for everybody else.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •