Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 28

Thread: Lead levels linked to violent crime

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    36th Chamber
    Posts
    12,423

    Lead levels linked to violent crime

    George Monbiot
    The Guardian, Monday 7 January 2013 20.30 GMT

    At first it seemed preposterous. The hypothesis was so exotic that I laughed. The rise and fall of violent crime during the second half of the 20th century and first years of the 21st were caused, it proposed, not by changes in policing or imprisonment, single parenthood, recession, crack cocaine or the legalisation of abortion, but mainly by … lead.

    I don't mean bullets. The crime waves that afflicted many parts of the world and then, against all predictions, collapsed, were ascribed, in an article published by Mother Jones last week, to the rise and fall in the use of lead-based paint and leaded petrol.

    It's ridiculous – until you see the evidence. Studies between cities, states and nations show that the rise and fall in crime follows, with a roughly 20-year lag, the rise and fall in the exposure of infants to trace quantities of lead. But all that gives us is correlation: an association that could be coincidental. The Mother Jones article, which is based on several scientific papers, claimed causation.

    I began by reading the papers. Do they say what the article claims? They do. Then I looked up the citations: the discussion of those papers in the scientific literature. The three whose citations I checked have been mentioned, between them, 301 times. I went through all these papers (except the handful in foreign languages), as well as dozens of others. To my astonishment, I could find just one study attacking the thesis, and this was sponsored by the Ethyl Corporation, which happens to have been a major manufacturer of the petrol additive tetraethyl lead. I found many more supporting it. Crazy as this seems, it really does look as if lead poisoning could be the major cause of the rise and fall of violent crime.

    The curve is much the same in all the countries these papers have studied. Lead was withdrawn first from paint and then from petrol at different times in different places (beginning in the 1970s in the US in the case of petrol, and the 1990s in many parts of Europe), yet despite these different times and different circumstances, the pattern is the same: violent crime peaks around 20 years after lead pollution peaks. The crime rates in big and small cities in the US, once wildly different, have now converged, also some 20 years after the phase-out.

    Nothing else seems to explain these trends. The researchers have taken great pains to correct for the obvious complicating variables: social, economic and legal factors. One paper found, after 15 variables had been taken into account, a four-fold increase in homicides in US counties with the highest lead pollution. Another discovered that lead levels appeared to explain 90% of the difference in rates of aggravated assault between US cities.

    A study in Cincinnati finds that young people prosecuted for delinquency are four times more likely than the general population to have high levels of lead in their bones. A meta-analysis (a study of studies) of 19 papers found no evidence that other factors could explain the correlation between exposure to lead and conduct problems in young people.

    Is it really so surprising that a highly potent nerve toxin causes behavioural change? The devastating and permanent impacts of even very low levels of lead on IQ have been known for many decades. Behavioural effects were first documented in 1943: infants who had tragically chewed the leaded paint off the railings of their cots were found, years after they had recovered from acute poisoning, to be highly disposed to aggression and violence.

    Lead poisoning in infancy, even at very low levels, impairs the development of those parts of the brain (the anterior cingulate cortex and prefrontal cortex) that regulate behaviour and mood. The effect is stronger in boys than in girls. Lead poisoning is associated with attention deficit disorder, impulsiveness, aggression and, according to one paper, psychopathy. Lead is so toxic that it is unsafe at any level.

    Because they were more likely to live in inner cities, in unrenovated housing whose lead paint was peeling and beside busy roads, African Americans have been subjected to higher average levels of lead poisoning than white Americans. One study, published in 1986, found that 18% of white children but 52% of black children in the US had over 20 milligrammes per decilitre of lead in their blood; another found that, between 1976 and 1980, black infants were eight times more likely to be carrying the horrendous load of 40mg/dl. This, two papers propose, could explain much of the difference in crime rates between black and white Americans, and the supposed difference in IQ trumpeted by the book The Bell Curve.

    There is only one remaining manufacturer of tetraethyl lead on earth. It's based in Ellesmere Port in Britain, and it's called Innospec. The product has long been banned from general sale in the UK, but the company admits on its website that it's still selling this poison to other countries. Innospec refuses to talk to me, but other reports claim that tetraethyl lead is being exported to Afghanistan, Algeria, Burma, Iraq, North Korea, Sierra Leone and Yemen, countries afflicted either by chaos or by governments who don't give a **** about their people.

    In 2010 the company admitted that, under the name Associated Octel, it had paid millions of dollars in bribes to officials in Iraq and Indonesia to be allowed to continue, at immense profit, selling tetratethyl lead. Through an agreement with the British and American courts, Innospec was let off so lightly that Lord Justice Thomas complained that "no such arrangement should be made again". God knows how many lives this firm has ruined.

    The UK government tells me that because tetraethyl lead is not on the European list of controlled exports, there is nothing to prevent Innospec from selling to whoever it wants. There's a term for this: environmental racism.

    If it is true that lead pollution, whose wider impacts have been recognised for decades, has driven the rise and fall of violence, then there lies, behind the crimes that have destroyed so many lives and filled so many prisons, a much greater crime.

    A fully referenced version of this article can be found at Monbiot.com Twitter: @georgemonbiot
    He most honors my style who learns under it to destroy the teacher. -- Walt Whitman

    Quote Originally Posted by David Jamieson View Post
    As a mod, I don't have to explain myself to you.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    766
    Great post MK!

    The article you posted from the Guardian led me to the site linked below which has some nice graphs that really put this study into perspective.

    http://www.motherjones.com/environme...-link-gasoline

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Augusta, GA
    Posts
    5,096
    Very, VERY speculative.

    Just because you have high numbers matching high numbers does not take into account moderating or multiple independent variables.

    In other words, was that THE factor, or was it simply a variable which MAY be the primary attribute?

    Everyone who was ever knocked out in a pro boxing match was wearing a mouth guard and a pair of boxing gloves. Are the chemicals in either causing them to get knocked out? See where I'm going with this?

    Not saying it is or isn't the cause, but the article reads like bad research.
    The weakest of all weak things is a virtue that has not been tested in the fire.
    ~ Mark Twain

    Everyone has a plan until they’ve been hit.
    ~ Joe Lewis

    A warrior may choose pacifism; others are condemned to it.
    ~ Author unknown

    "You don't feel lonely.Because you have a lively monkey"

    "Ninja can HURT the Spartan, but the Spartan can KILL the Ninja"

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    766
    I don't think we should judge this research to harshly Drake. The way the article was written maybe but not necessarily the research. The thing about research is that it's usually biased towards one point of view or another.

    At least the writer of this article linked at the bottom where to find his 32 references which is a good start when putting forth this kind of information. Many of those references have their own references and some of those studies go back to the 1940's.

    I think society has a pretty good grasp of just how bad lead exposure can be to the body and this research is just attempting to link some dots which may connect that exposure to crime and violence. Maybe the extensive use of lead pipes was why the Romans were such a violent society.

    The really interesting thing to me is that this data appears to be consistent across the globe despite social conditions, crime prevention...etc.

  5. #5
    I don't think the Romans used any pipes they used carved stone to make their water lead into the cities, more or so it's just that you had to be aggressive or be killed in those days. Lead exposure is horribly bad, especially for young children.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Augusta, GA
    Posts
    5,096
    Quote Originally Posted by GoldenBrain View Post
    I don't think we should judge this research to harshly Drake. The way the article was written maybe but not necessarily the research. The thing about research is that it's usually biased towards one point of view or another.

    At least the writer of this article linked at the bottom where to find his 32 references which is a good start when putting forth this kind of information. Many of those references have their own references and some of those studies go back to the 1940's.

    I think society has a pretty good grasp of just how bad lead exposure can be to the body and this research is just attempting to link some dots which may connect that exposure to crime and violence. Maybe the extensive use of lead pipes was why the Romans were such a violent society.

    The really interesting thing to me is that this data appears to be consistent across the globe despite social conditions, crime prevention...etc.
    It's common practice in research to address bias. Anyway, I'll judge it as harshly as I like. It's not like the research is going to have hurt feelings over it.
    The weakest of all weak things is a virtue that has not been tested in the fire.
    ~ Mark Twain

    Everyone has a plan until they’ve been hit.
    ~ Joe Lewis

    A warrior may choose pacifism; others are condemned to it.
    ~ Author unknown

    "You don't feel lonely.Because you have a lively monkey"

    "Ninja can HURT the Spartan, but the Spartan can KILL the Ninja"

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Augusta, GA
    Posts
    5,096
    Quote Originally Posted by Raipizo View Post
    I don't think the Romans used any pipes they used carved stone to make their water lead into the cities, more or so it's just that you had to be aggressive or be killed in those days. Lead exposure is horribly bad, especially for young children.
    No doubt, lead is harmful. But you have to determine in what ways it harms us.
    The weakest of all weak things is a virtue that has not been tested in the fire.
    ~ Mark Twain

    Everyone has a plan until they’ve been hit.
    ~ Joe Lewis

    A warrior may choose pacifism; others are condemned to it.
    ~ Author unknown

    "You don't feel lonely.Because you have a lively monkey"

    "Ninja can HURT the Spartan, but the Spartan can KILL the Ninja"

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    766
    Quote Originally Posted by Drake View Post
    It's common practice in research to address bias. Anyway, I'll judge it as harshly as I like. It's not like the research is going to have hurt feelings over it.
    Indeed and I like the way you worded that. Some might have seen my comment as adversarial or telling you how to think but I sure didn't mean it that way, which is why I said "I don't think we should..." I believe there is much more research to be done, because I would also like to know exactly how lead affects us. All I'm told by the research is that it does but how is the real question.

    To Raipizo,

    I'm not trying to pick at you. I'm just trying to stay accurate. If I'm wrong please let me know. For sure they used stone but there is lots of evidence to support them using lead pipes as well as lead pots for use in cooking. I'll paste links to a couple of sites that describe lead uses in Roman culture. One is a wine website discussing the subject and the other is the EPA's website.

    http://penelope.uchicago.edu/~grout/...poisoning.html

    http://www.epa.gov/history/topics/perspect/lead.html

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Corner of somewhere and where am I
    Posts
    1,322
    http://www.sciencedirect.com/science...13935107000503

    Here is a link to an actual study on the matter. You have to have a ScienceDirect account or its a pricey fee. I don't have access to it at home, I'll see if I can download it next week.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Augusta, GA
    Posts
    5,096
    Quote Originally Posted by SoCo KungFu View Post
    http://www.sciencedirect.com/science...13935107000503

    Here is a link to an actual study on the matter. You have to have a ScienceDirect account or its a pricey fee. I don't have access to it at home, I'll see if I can download it next week.
    My university should have access. Will check later.
    The weakest of all weak things is a virtue that has not been tested in the fire.
    ~ Mark Twain

    Everyone has a plan until they’ve been hit.
    ~ Joe Lewis

    A warrior may choose pacifism; others are condemned to it.
    ~ Author unknown

    "You don't feel lonely.Because you have a lively monkey"

    "Ninja can HURT the Spartan, but the Spartan can KILL the Ninja"

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Pound Town
    Posts
    7,856
    Quote Originally Posted by Raipizo View Post
    I don't think the Romans used any pipes they used carved stone to make their water lead into the cities, more or so it's just that you had to be aggressive or be killed in those days. Lead exposure is horribly bad, especially for young children.
    yet germanic tribes and huns razed rome. must be high lead levels in the trees and grass.

    Honorary African American
    grandmaster instructor of Wombat Combat The Lost Art of Anal Destruction™®LLC .
    Senior Business Director at TEAM ASSHAMMER consulting services ™®LLC

  12. #12
    It's not a new theory at all. It's just getting more love these days.



    Back in the day in the northeastern US they had these summer diseases that affected children and some genius came along and was like "hey, kids eat lots of ice cream in the summer" and all the sudden ice cream causes these problems.

    I don't have much of an opinion on the lead thing, I would have to do my own research first. I'm not really into believing what I read because they use technical jargon. I do feel like I'm in the minority on that one though. I think it's pretty sad how little people know about the stuff they consume. Knowingly or otherwise. It's seems like people have time for "ancient aliens", housewives and jersey shore yet they can't seem to find the time to read a fucking book that actually teaches something universally useful. Sad shit.

    Beware publication bias. Do your own work.
    Last edited by Syn7; 02-17-2013 at 02:19 PM.

  13. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by Drake View Post
    My university should have access. Will check later.
    Share please.

  14. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by GoldenBrain View Post
    I don't think we should judge this research to harshly Drake. The way the article was written maybe but not necessarily the research. The thing about research is that it's usually biased towards one point of view or another.

    At least the writer of this article linked at the bottom where to find his 32 references which is a good start when putting forth this kind of information. Many of those references have their own references and some of those studies go back to the 1940's.

    I think society has a pretty good grasp of just how bad lead exposure can be to the body and this research is just attempting to link some dots which may connect that exposure to crime and violence. Maybe the extensive use of lead pipes was why the Romans were such a violent society.

    The really interesting thing to me is that this data appears to be consistent across the globe despite social conditions, crime prevention...etc.

    Google Ben Goldacre Battling bad science. He does a great job of showing the flaws (nutshell) without bogging down those of you who aren't involved in research with details you won't really understand.

    The problem is not the references they gave, it's the ones they did not give.

    If I do an experiment 100 times and have the luxury of leaving out half the data, I can make my hypothesis look rock solid when in reality it may not be any more valid than the flipside.
    Last edited by Syn7; 02-17-2013 at 02:25 PM.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Augusta, GA
    Posts
    5,096
    Quote Originally Posted by Syn7 View Post
    Share please.
    You know that's illegal, right?
    The weakest of all weak things is a virtue that has not been tested in the fire.
    ~ Mark Twain

    Everyone has a plan until they’ve been hit.
    ~ Joe Lewis

    A warrior may choose pacifism; others are condemned to it.
    ~ Author unknown

    "You don't feel lonely.Because you have a lively monkey"

    "Ninja can HURT the Spartan, but the Spartan can KILL the Ninja"

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •