I agree and the reason is that from day one in the gym they are trying to improve the punch. A lot of VT systems don;t have that. They get stuck on each others arms and have no real power. They can egg whisk the air very well though.
Another thing given attention to in my lineage, increasing punching power. The dummy, wall bag, poon sau and the long pole are just a few methods that help punching power and precision.
Here's a question. When Tyson does his step off the check hook, is the energy on the bridge dictating where his feet land? Or is he manufacturing some extra movement to get there?
therein to me lies the WCK concept or not.
We have a "feet follow hands" type of kuen kuit saying that is trained up with drilling from beginning. The idea is that energy on the bridge dictates your footwork because you hold your structure true rather than elbows and limbs collapsing in on yourself from the bridge.
What is "the bridge"?
Any kind of persistent contact between you and your opponent. something between you and your striking target. chi sau forearm contact is a bridge. some people translate chum kiu as "sinking the bridge" I've heard but I'm no Chinese term expert.
And, of course, something you must drive over before you can pillage your opponent's village
Last edited by Wayfaring; 02-20-2013 at 03:59 PM.
[QUOTE=GlennR;1212914]I think the word "athletically" is the key. Tyson bob-weave style combined with a lot of lateral footwork is taxing (compare it to what a Klitschko does) IMO opinion its a younger boxers style and hard to maintain as you get older. Frazier is another that comes to mind that peaked when he was young.
((True))joy
Exactly, but they actively transfer weight on the turn, adding power that WC just doesnt have available.
((Not necessarily true.There is a lot of footwork in my lineage-don't lose power))Joy
Didnt say there wasnt any power Joy, just not as much((Not necessarily true.There is a lot of footwork in my lineage-don't lose power))Joy