Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 33

Thread: BJJ brain Vs Kung Fu brain

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Hobart Tasmania - Australia
    Posts
    701

    BJJ brain Vs Kung Fu brain

    Ok so been doing some BJJ of late which has been great, really enjoying it.

    Something came up in last nights class.

    Teacher had me in mount and said there is not much you can do from here as he was getting ready for a sub, and that was true to an extent.

    My old Kung Fu brain was ticking over and I said well I can jam and elbow into your groin or go for the grab - it was a target.

    He could do some nasty things also but if I get that first shot I would have thought most people are going to have trouble trying to finish a technique in this type of pain. I figure im on the bottom and have nothing to lose so its a target.

    The other thing I have heard them say is that its a desparate move, I would have thought its just a logical one (self defence flavour).

    I just feel sometimes with the BJJ people they get lazy and think no one is going to go for that stuff

    Thoughts??
    Last edited by Blacktiger; 03-15-2013 at 05:09 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Shell Beach, CA, USA
    Posts
    6,664
    Blog Entries
    16
    Whatever that you can do to your opponent, your opponent can do that to you too. It's better to develop some ground skill than try to depend on your counter-ground skill. If you can make your body to be relax without wasting unnecessary energy, that will be a good start.

    It's better to learn

    - striking skill than to learn counter-striking skill.
    - throwing skill than to learn counter-throwing skill.
    - ground skill than to learn counter-ground skill.

    It's better to use "skill" and lose than to use "counter-skill" and win, because someday the guy who always use the skill will have good skill but the same can't be said about the guy who always play counter.
    Last edited by YouKnowWho; 03-15-2013 at 04:32 PM.
    http://johnswang.com

    More opinion -> more argument
    Less opinion -> less argument
    No opinion -> no argument

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Pound Town
    Posts
    7,856
    Quote Originally Posted by Blacktiger View Post

    He could do some nasty things also but if I get that first shot I would have thought most people are going to have trouble trying to finish a technique in this type of pain.
    If.


    sdfsdg

    Honorary African American
    grandmaster instructor of Wombat Combat The Lost Art of Anal Destruction™®LLC .
    Senior Business Director at TEAM ASSHAMMER consulting services ™®LLC

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Blacktiger View Post
    I just feel sometimes with the BJJ people get lazy and think no one is going to go for that.

    Thoughts??
    Kung Fu, at least how I was taught, teaches you to look for opportunity anywhere and work outside the box when needed. I don't know if it's about "being lazy", but many people don't learn to think this way. They work only from their catalog of techniques.

    I think Kung Fu's adaptability and attacking from unorthodox or compromised angles or positions is a strength.
    Quote Originally Posted by YouKnowWho View Post
    This is 100% TCMA principle. It may be used in non-TCMA also. Since I did learn it from TCMA, I have to say it's TCMA principle.
    Quote Originally Posted by YouKnowWho View Post
    We should not use "TCMA is more than combat" as excuse for not "evolving".

    You can have Kung Fu in cooking, it really has nothing to do with fighting!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Shell Beach, CA, USA
    Posts
    6,664
    Blog Entries
    16
    Quote Originally Posted by Blacktiger View Post
    but if I get that first shot ...
    If you can get the 1st shot, that means your opponent doesn't have the dominate control over you. I still think it's better to train how to get the dominate control instead.

    Here is a simple example. In stand up grappling, if you can get your opponent in double overhook or double underhook, your opponent won't be able to strike you. The same principle can be applied in the ground game as well.
    Last edited by YouKnowWho; 03-15-2013 at 05:15 PM.
    http://johnswang.com

    More opinion -> more argument
    Less opinion -> less argument
    No opinion -> no argument

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canada!
    Posts
    23,110
    Quote Originally Posted by bawang View Post
    If.
    To be fair, "if" apples to getting the mount and having G&P position.
    I've seen guys get out of it, so have you. Elbow to the artery is definitely something, but I always see it as a press as opposed to a strike and usually combined with an outside ankle stopping the mounters leg from stabilty.

    anyway...
    Kung Fu is good for you.

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Blacktiger View Post
    Ok so been doing some BJJ of late which has been great, really enjoying it.

    Something came up in last nights class.

    Teacher had me in mount and said there is not much you can do from here as he was getting ready for a sub, and that was true to an extent.

    My old Kung Fu brain was ticking over and I said well I can jam and elbow into your groin or go for the grab - it was a target.

    He could do some nasty things also but if I get that first shot I would have thought most people are going to have trouble trying to finish a technique in this type of pain. I figure im on the bottom and have nothing to lose so its a target.

    The other thing I have heard them say is that its a desparate move, I would have thought its just a logical one (self defence flavour).

    I just feel sometimes with the BJJ people they get lazy and think no one is going to go for that stuff

    Thoughts??
    I would be happy to trade the ability to slam down punches and elbows into the opponent's face while his other hand is occupied while going for the groin. He's going to be KTFO and bleeding profusely before he has a chance to get much of a grip.

    Here's an old clip of Rorion Gracie choking out a guy who tries to go for the groin. The guy was lucky Rorion decided not to smash on his face, but went for the choke instead.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0RawPYGzYOQ

    Going for the groin from bottom mount is not thinking outside the box, it is thinking stupidly.
    Last edited by LaRoux; 03-15-2013 at 05:21 PM.

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by Kellen Bassette View Post
    Kung Fu, at least how I was taught, teaches you to look for opportunity anywhere and work outside the box when needed. I don't know if it's about "being lazy", but many people don't learn to think this way. They work only from their catalog of techniques.

    I think Kung Fu's adaptability and attacking from unorthodox or compromised angles or positions is a strength.
    Pretty much any BJJ instructor has had hoards of guys from TMA's over the years attempt miscellaneous groin grabs, pinches, finger breaks, and nerve/pressure point applications during sparring or challenge matches. The reason they tell you these things don't work is because they've had scores of guys try these things over the years and they know from experience what works and what doesn't work.

    Here's the difference between BJJ and kung fu. Kung fu teaches you to look outside the box when you can't figure out the solution to a situation. BJJ teaches you to figure out the solution to every situation long before you get into that situation.
    Last edited by LaRoux; 03-15-2013 at 05:44 PM.

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by LaRoux View Post
    Pretty much any BJJ instructor has had hoards of guys from TMA's over the years attempt miscellaneous groin grabs, pinches, finger breaks, and nerve/pressure point applications. The reason they tell you these things don't work is because they've had scores of guys try these things over the years and they know from experience what works and what doesn't work.
    I wasn't really speaking to any particular technique, just generalizing. I wouldn't attempt a groin grab while mounted. If I saw an opportunity to strike before bucking and tying up I might take it though.

    There's so many opportunities to strike while rolling. Of course you can do this in MMA, but in straight BJJ it seems like it tends to goes unnoticed due to the preoccupation with the sub. Don't get me wrong, I think practicing that way is great for honing your ground skills, but you need to be aware of the striking opportunities and should use them while rolling sometimes, if your not.

    I think things like putting pressure on the solar plexus, chest, throat ect, with your elbow, pushing on the face, grinding with the forearm...(dirty grappling) when in the guard, may be underutilized as well.
    Quote Originally Posted by YouKnowWho View Post
    This is 100% TCMA principle. It may be used in non-TCMA also. Since I did learn it from TCMA, I have to say it's TCMA principle.
    Quote Originally Posted by YouKnowWho View Post
    We should not use "TCMA is more than combat" as excuse for not "evolving".

    You can have Kung Fu in cooking, it really has nothing to do with fighting!

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Kellen Bassette View Post
    There's so many opportunities to strike while rolling. Of course you can do this in MMA, but in straight BJJ it seems like it tends to goes unnoticed due to the preoccupation with the sub. Don't get me wrong, I think practicing that way is great for honing your ground skills, but you need to be aware of the striking opportunities and should use them while rolling sometimes, if your not.
    Same goes for biting and utilizing weapons. The only way to find out which ones work is to actually train them, not theorize about them.

    I think things like putting pressure on the solar plexus, chest, throat ect, with your elbow, pushing on the face, grinding with the forearm...(dirty grappling) when in the guard, may be underutilized as well.
    Same things about training with striking and biting and weapons applies here. Train to put pressure on the face while taking biting into account and you'll get a whole different perspective.

  11. #11
    I was mounted in a real fight about a decade ago. It was a dumb mistake that got me there and the guy had about 30 pounds on me. He wasn't in enough control to posture up yet, I grabbed his adams apple and squeezed and pulled, he reacted and I got the sweep and ended up in his guard, pulled out and backed off and got em cold while he was trying to get up. I may have been able to defend for awhile but I didn't wanna be on the ground at all. It's not something I would teach, but it worked for me that day.

  12. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by LaRoux View Post
    Same goes for biting and utilizing weapons. The only way to find out which ones work is to actually train them, not theorize about them.
    This is true...of course there's the practicality thing about training with biting...I try to take for granted that biting will work and be aware I don't get my fingers in a position where they could be bitten. (Even though I'm in no danger of being bit while rolling.) I also try to never be in a position where biting is my only resort.

    I know a guy who got into a lot of bar fights when he was young; he wasn't trained just got into a lot of street fights. He got into a brawl with a Karate guy, was getting kicked in the head and beat bad. For some stupid reason the Karate guy fish hooked him. He bit the meat clean off his finger; down to the bone.

    He told me the guy could have still beat him, but he freaked out and ran. Couldn't take the psychological aspect of having his finger bitten off.

    I think your right about weapons. They need to be trained realistically, the same as empty hand. If you think you can fight with a broom handle because you do a nice staff form, it will probably end the same as you thinking you can fight empty handed because you punch in the air a lot....
    Quote Originally Posted by YouKnowWho View Post
    This is 100% TCMA principle. It may be used in non-TCMA also. Since I did learn it from TCMA, I have to say it's TCMA principle.
    Quote Originally Posted by YouKnowWho View Post
    We should not use "TCMA is more than combat" as excuse for not "evolving".

    You can have Kung Fu in cooking, it really has nothing to do with fighting!

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    4,381
    Quote Originally Posted by Blacktiger View Post
    Ok so been doing some BJJ of late which has been great, really enjoying it.

    Something came up in last nights class.

    Teacher had me in mount and said there is not much you can do from here as he was getting ready for a sub, and that was true to an extent.

    My old Kung Fu brain was ticking over and I said well I can jam and elbow into your groin or go for the grab - it was a target.

    He could do some nasty things also but if I get that first shot I would have thought most people are going to have trouble trying to finish a technique in this type of pain. I figure im on the bottom and have nothing to lose so its a target.

    The other thing I have heard them say is that its a desparate move, I would have thought its just a logical one (self defence flavour).

    I just feel sometimes with the BJJ people they get lazy and think no one is going to go for that stuff

    Thoughts??
    they are lazy because they are in a sports environment and are thinking about sports techniques which are allowed under the rules they compete in as opposed to illegal techniques that aren't allowed????...really how man years have you been doing BJJ again?
    simple answer is ask the teacher to allow you to roll with all techniques and strikes allowed and then try your move and see how it goes...........of course he probably wont be as nice as rto go for a sub from mount but feed you your teach from high mount which negates the goin attack, or will take oyur eyes out whilst in a low smothering mount which doesnt allow you to hit the groin easily

    Oh it is a desperation move because even if you hit the target chances are he will stay on top of you and not fall off (adrenaline is a funny thing like that) so he will still be on top of you, and is now really p*ssed at you and angry and not playing by any rules hat so ever

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Norfair
    Posts
    9,109
    I remember asking if someone had you in mount and went for the arm bar if you could just bite their leg.

    They were like yes, but you'll still get your arm broken.
    "If you like metal you're my friend" -- Manowar

    "I am the cosmic storms, I am the tiny worms" -- Dimmu Borgir

    <BombScare> i beat the internet
    <BombScare> the end guy is hard.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    4,381
    Quote Originally Posted by IronFist View Post
    I remember asking if someone had you in mount and went for the arm bar if you could just bite their leg.

    They were like yes, but you'll still get your arm broken.
    to be honest getting your arm broken is the least of your worries.....getting yourself blinded would be my concern lol

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •