Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 19

Thread: Catch something on the way back

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Shell Beach, CA, USA
    Posts
    6,664
    Blog Entries
    16

    Catch something on the way back

    Old Chinese saying said, "收手的時候,手上要帶著東西回來,(When you pull your punch, you have to catch something on the way back)".

    When you punch and your opponent blocks, your punch should change into a grab. This way you can pull your opponent's arm back.

    I find this principle is an excellent bridge to link the striking art and the grappling art together. Your thought?
    http://johnswang.com

    More opinion -> more argument
    Less opinion -> less argument
    No opinion -> no argument

  2. #2
    I always felt this was yet another reason for the chambering in traditional martial arts. The pull back with one hand is as much part of the training as the punching forward with the other. Roughly simulates punching, it getting blocked, then quickly pulling the block and punching with the other hand.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Shell Beach, CA, USA
    Posts
    6,664
    Blog Entries
    16
    Quote Originally Posted by Punch.HeadButt View Post
    I always felt this was yet another reason for the chambering in traditional martial arts. The pull back with one hand is as much part of the training as the punching forward with the other. Roughly simulates punching, it getting blocked, then quickly pulling the block and punching with the other hand.
    Agree! You can change your punching arm into a grabbing arm. You can also change your blocking arm into a grappling arm (采 Cai). I find this principle is quite unique in TCMA.

    I believe the general TCMA term is called "采(Cai) - pick".
    http://johnswang.com

    More opinion -> more argument
    Less opinion -> less argument
    No opinion -> no argument

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    766
    Quote Originally Posted by YouKnowWho View Post
    Agree! You can change your punching arm into a grabbing arm. You can also change your blocking arm into a grappling arm (采 Cai). I find this principle is quite unique in TCMA.

    I believe the general TCMA term is called "采(Cai) - pick".
    I agree with your OP but I don't think it's completely unique to TCMA. I found it in Okinawan Karate, Kali Arnis as well as 5 Animal Sil-Lum. Also, I think chambering high rather than low to the hip is better suited for this. I've never been taught to chamber low but I see it all the time in videos and it just doesn't seem correct to me.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Bondi, Sydney Australia
    Posts
    2,502
    Yes, certainly. Sticky hands.
    Guangzhou Pak Mei Kung Fu School, Sydney Australia,
    Sifu Leung, Yuk Seng
    Established 1989, Glebe Australia

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Northern Ireland
    Posts
    6
    Seems like a sound enough principle. I have a vague recollection of being taught something along those lines when I studied ju-jitsu many, many moons ago.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    DengFeng
    Posts
    1,469
    Yes, Its an excellent principle, often referred to also as 'Dai' shou, to add a hand.

    You can also use this principle to claw at someones face after they have guarded or dodged, a claw sweeps out a large area where as a punch hit a point, so the claw is harder to evade.

  8. #8
    You can also change your blocking arm into a grappling arm (采 Cai).
    I was once told not to "block" an incoming strike, but to "accept" it. I really like the term "accepting" in that context.

    I think chambering high rather than low to the hip is better suited for this. I've never been taught to chamber low but I see it all the time in videos and it just doesn't seem correct to me.
    I'd agree with that. Chambering at the hip "breaks" your arm at the wrist. Plus I don't think there's as much power in the pull if it travels the path to the hip instead of the ribs.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    1,002
    "The hand does not come back empty"

    I agree, it works great for moving things into close range.
    -Golden Arms-

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by YouKnowWho View Post
    When you punch and your opponent blocks, your punch should change into a grab. This way you can pull your opponent's arm back.

    Your thought?
    In tong bei and ba ji, we may confine or grab the opponent's arm.

    However, we do not pull it toward us.

    Instead we move our body forward to be close to the opponent.

    So we confine or guard the opponent's hand or arm where it was.

    We close in with our body at the same time.


  11. #11
    I thought this thread was going to be about exotic vacations overseas with the title.

    My answer then would be "that's why they invented penicillin."

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    2,111
    Quote Originally Posted by Punch.HeadButt View Post
    I was once told not to "block" an incoming strike, but to "accept" it. I really like the term "accepting" in that context.
    In Mantis, we say cheong 搶.

    Snatch/steal/rob the attack.

    It is more aggressive and active than just accepting the attack.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    2,111
    Quote Originally Posted by YouKnowWho View Post
    When you punch and your opponent blocks, your punch should change into a grab. This way you can pull your opponent's arm back.
    搶 before his block connects.

  14. #14
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pYgqZECK-Ro

    In this clip,

    it does not matter that we intercept the opponent at high or low,

    you may notice that my fist, elbow, hip and body move close or forward.

    Instead pulling toward our self, we confine or guard the opponent's hand or arm, we move our body close to him.

    This is called advance body kao or jin shen kao.

    etc etc.


  15. #15
    In Mantis, we say cheong 搶.

    Snatch/steal/rob the attack.

    It is more aggressive and active than just accepting the attack.
    I'd consider that preferable. IME, there's three ways to respond to a striking attack: attack it, avoid it, or "accept" it. The former is preferable in situating yourself as the controlling party, but sometimes you have to choose between the latter two options. Sometimes you don't read the intent in time to attack the attack. At least, sometimes I don't

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •