haha. You're probably not far from the truth.
What's funny to me is, people like lone tiger that have a lot to say on what WC is and isn't, what it should or shouldn't be, yet refuse to answer any direct questions about what thier own 'correct' training methods are that they base all of these views off of. Look how many times you've asked guy b the same simple, easy-to-answer questions that always go ignored!
I can only assmue they are trolling if they refuse to give any examples of the experience they base their opinions off of. I could be wrong, but the evidence (or lack of) doesn't show it to be so..
Aa a counter point, any time someone asks you a question, you can list how many days you train, what goes on during that training, who you train with etc. Doesn't make you more right/wrong that someone else, but it does show you are speaking from your own experiences which goes a long way in my book.
Last edited by JPinAZ; 05-28-2013 at 03:41 PM.
What chi sau is, or isn't, or is, or wait, what is it..: http://ezine.kungfumagazine.com/foru...2&postcount=90
How I love ignore
What chi sau is, or isn't, or is, or wait, what is it..: http://ezine.kungfumagazine.com/foru...2&postcount=90
fighters no, boxers yes.There is absolutely no evidence that the Klitschko brothers are effective fighters.
Originally posted by BawangOriginally posted by Bawangi had an old taichi lady talk smack behind my back. i mean comon man, come on. if it was 200 years ago,, mebbe i wouldve smacked her and took all her monehs.i am manly and strong. do not insult me cracker.
That doesn't mean that it would not translate. Yes they would need additional training but the path is well set below there feet, more so than most.Exactly the case
Originally posted by BawangOriginally posted by Bawangi had an old taichi lady talk smack behind my back. i mean comon man, come on. if it was 200 years ago,, mebbe i wouldve smacked her and took all her monehs.i am manly and strong. do not insult me cracker.
A clever man learns from his mistakes but a truly wise man learns from the mistakes of others.
Wing Chun kung fu in Redditch
Worcestershire Wing Chun Kuen on facebook
Wah! Isn't this what everyone else here is asking too? And they all have their answers which I can only presume most guys here agree with?
You spar.
You fight.
You compete.
You pressure test.
A 5 year old can do everything above with NO Martial Art training whatsoever!!! Actually what people are saying is you test your Wing Chun by doing anything BUT your curriculum... Sheez!
How do you test your Wing Chun without fighting? Answer me that...
Ti Fei
詠春國術
A clever man learns from his mistakes but a truly wise man learns from the mistakes of others.
Wing Chun kung fu in Redditch
Worcestershire Wing Chun Kuen on facebook
You can test your wing chun without fighting. You can test your structure without fighting, you can test your chi Sao without fighting, you can test your form without fighting and so on. These are all wing chun. Wing chun has various levels and you can test each one only through performance by doing that aspect. You test structure through performance, chi Sao through performance, form through performance and yes application through performance. How else can you possibly test your ability to freely apply your wing chun skills against someone trying to fight back except by doing that?
Performing the curriculum tests your knowledge of the curriculum but it does not test your ability to freely use your wing chun against someone fighting you.
Last edited by tc101; 05-29-2013 at 03:44 AM.