Does anyone else think that 38 years for two brutal murders is way too lenient?
Does anyone else think that 38 years for two brutal murders is way too lenient?
Honorary African American
grandmaster instructor of Wombat Combat The Lost Art of Anal Destruction™®LLC .
Senior Business Director at TEAM ASSHAMMER consulting services ™®LLC
Use it all the time to make gringos and mexicans squirm here haha - but they're killing indios in juarez now so hard to believe, but can't go there! Worst for central American Indio but why take chances -
Perhaps some people simply understand it as the word for indians and that indians are regarded as sub animals in mexico.
It mean Indian not animal - sub animal is status
"The perfect way to do, is to be" ~ Lao Tzu
Language changes constantly though here the comment was made about the term wang ba dan made about "indio". In most of European countries there is clear discrimination against blacks and more against Arabs, those who do the dirty jobs. The term "indio" is used mainly in Latinoamerican countries where indios are considered less than domesticated animals even today.
"The term "indio" is used mainly in Latinoamerican countries where indios are considered less than domesticated animals even today."
Hey I hate to have to repeat this, like you repeating it makes you right when you're not, but as a Indio I am telling you:
Indio = i-n-d-i-a-n-s = indigenous people
Status of Indios in mexico = subhuman
Again, indio means Indian. Only. By insisting that it itself is the insult you are not only being ignorant, but insulting.
Indios are not considered subhuman everywhere despite your attempt to make it seem that way. "Indio" is NOT a "n" word little sister. Stop saying that.
I suppose it is perfectly alright if you are ignorant and insulting, as long as you mean well because you're a libtard or white?
Indio means Indian like african means black - the n* part is regional according to the status of the indios there.
Last edited by curenado; 05-07-2015 at 02:17 PM.
"The perfect way to do, is to be" ~ Lao Tzu
There are a couple of important differences there. A Catholic priest who does what you describe actually is an ordained Catholic priest. This guy never was a Buddhist monk. He just dressed as one.
Not only that, in the Catholic church it's "once a priest always a priest". However a Buddhist monk who commits one of the four offences entailing defeat is no longer a Buddhist monk. Permanently. Regardless of whether he is ever found out or confesses.