Originally Posted by
Golden Arms
I am puzzled by the "no BS" attitude I see thrown around on the internet a lot. If you trained hard as a fighter under a teacher with a fighting background, then there was no "BS" to begin with.
Saying "no BS" martial arts is a lot like saying "I have a gun that actually shoots bullets". The guns that don't shoot bullets are not real guns, and never were. Anyone actually shopping for a gun would never have considered a gun that could not shoot bullets in the first place.
I just don't get it. Anyone care to explain?
Is kung fu that is taught in an environment that doesn't allow for its practitioners to actually fight well with it against people that know how to fight, BS?
Is kung fu that is more interested in its "lineage" and traditions OVER the ability of its practitioners to actually USE it, BS?
Is Kung fu that is so isolate that it doesn't address the modern era of H2H combat, BS?
Is Kung fu that goes against its practitioners testing the system against people from OTHER systems, BS?
Psalms 144:1
Praise be my Lord my Rock,
He trains my hands for war, my fingers for battle !