Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 62

Thread: Which side will you pick?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Shell Beach, CA, USA
    Posts
    6,664
    Blog Entries
    16

    Which side will you pick?

    When you apply a "crescent kick", you can:

    1. Let your body to pull your leg.

    PRO: Your whole body is unified. You can use your body mass to generate maximum power.

    CON: Your body move can easily telegraph your intention. If you miss your target, you may over committed.

    2. Let your leg to pull your body.

    PRO: No telegraph. If you miss the target, it won't affect your own balance.

    CON: You may only use your leg power instead of whole body powr.

    So which side do you think that you like to be on?
    Last edited by YouKnowWho; 06-24-2013 at 09:17 PM.
    http://johnswang.com

    More opinion -> more argument
    Less opinion -> less argument
    No opinion -> no argument

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    766
    I choose #1. Even if you telegraph it you can follow up with a snappy or thrusting front kick. I've never been pulled off balance with this kick and often use it just to set up a front kick.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    2,111
    Quote Originally Posted by YouKnowWho View Post
    When you apply a "crescent kick", you can:

    1. Let your body to pull your leg.

    PRO: Your whole body is unified. You can use your body mass to generate maximum power.

    CON: Your body move can easily telegraph your intention. If you miss your target, you may over committed.
    You mean to use body torque to power the kick?

    It doesn't have to telegraph if you use short force body snap and hide that in the natural relaxation of a preceding motion of a combination attack.

    It will be like the answer to that question you always ask about "internal" kick.


    Quote Originally Posted by YouKnowWho View Post
    2. Let your leg to pull your body.

    PRO: No telegraph. If you miss the target, it won't affect your own balance.

    CON: You may only use your leg power instead of whole body powr.

    So which side do you think that you like to be on?
    You mean to power the kick with just the hip and leg muscles? And body might turn afterwards?

    No thanks.

    But with regard to power and missing the target, it depends on what you are trying to do. You adjust your power for the situation. If you mess up, you mess up.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Shell Beach, CA, USA
    Posts
    6,664
    Blog Entries
    16
    Here is a similiar argument. When a fly passes infront of your face, you try to smash it with both palms, do you let your

    - body to push your arms? or
    - arms to pull your body?
    http://johnswang.com

    More opinion -> more argument
    Less opinion -> less argument
    No opinion -> no argument

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    2,111
    Quote Originally Posted by YouKnowWho View Post
    PRO: No telegraph. If you miss the target, it won't affect your own balance.
    If you connect, it may have no effect.

    Are you just point sparring?

    Quote Originally Posted by YouKnowWho View Post
    Here is a similiar argument. When a fly passes infront of your face, you try to smash it with both palms, do you let your

    - body to push your arms? or
    - arms to pull your body?
    2 hands coming together is different than one kick going in one direction. You can use the body in a forward whip instead of a sideways torque.

    That said, body connection is for speed and non telegraphy as much as it is for power.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    2,111
    Here's Buakaw.

    http://www.youtube.com/#/watch?v=J58iTd2QoQM&

    Not crescent kicks, but body connection with minimal telegraph, lots of speed, and plenty of power.

    What's wrong with that?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    2,111
    Quote Originally Posted by -N- View Post
    Here's Buakaw.

    http://www.youtube.com/#/watch?v=J58iTd2QoQM&

    Not crescent kicks, but body connection with minimal telegraph, lots of speed, and plenty of power.

    What's wrong with that?
    This one.

    http://youtu.be/J58iTd2QoQM

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    36th Chamber
    Posts
    12,423
    Crescent kicks have to be the stupidest idea ever.

    Let's see, how can I create a kick that doesn't involve using hip torque AND also exposes my ankles to being broken/hyper-extended???
    He most honors my style who learns under it to destroy the teacher. -- Walt Whitman

    Quote Originally Posted by David Jamieson View Post
    As a mod, I don't have to explain myself to you.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Pound Town
    Posts
    7,856
    no such thing as a crescent kick. its a back kick done badly.

    Honorary African American
    grandmaster instructor of Wombat Combat The Lost Art of Anal Destruction™®LLC .
    Senior Business Director at TEAM ASSHAMMER consulting services ™®LLC

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by bawang View Post
    no such thing as a crescent kick. its a back kick done badly.
    pin teui
    baai lin teui

    NOT back kicks, def TCMA technique
    Chan Tai San Book at https://www.createspace.com/4891253

    Quote Originally Posted by taai gihk yahn View Post
    well, like LKFMDC - he's a genuine Kung Fu Hero™
    Quote Originally Posted by Taixuquan99 View Post
    As much as I get annoyed when it gets derailed by the array of strange angry people that hover around him like moths, his good posts are some of my favorites.
    Quote Originally Posted by Kellen Bassette View Post
    I think he goes into a cave to meditate and recharge his chi...and bite the heads off of bats, of course....

  11. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by MasterKiller View Post
    Crescent kicks have to be the stupidest idea ever.

    Let's see, how can I create a kick that doesn't involve using hip torque AND also exposes my ankles to being broken/hyper-extended???
    I can get plenty of power in mine and won't hurt my ankles at all

    specific application, limited application, but not NO application....
    Chan Tai San Book at https://www.createspace.com/4891253

    Quote Originally Posted by taai gihk yahn View Post
    well, like LKFMDC - he's a genuine Kung Fu Hero™
    Quote Originally Posted by Taixuquan99 View Post
    As much as I get annoyed when it gets derailed by the array of strange angry people that hover around him like moths, his good posts are some of my favorites.
    Quote Originally Posted by Kellen Bassette View Post
    I think he goes into a cave to meditate and recharge his chi...and bite the heads off of bats, of course....

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    桃花岛
    Posts
    5,031
    Quote Originally Posted by MasterKiller View Post
    Crescent kicks have to be the stupidest idea ever.
    I don't know about that. There's lots of stupid ideas in martial arts.
    Crescent kicks are certainly up there though.
    Simon McNeil
    ___________________________________________

    Be on the lookout for the Black Trillium, a post-apocalyptic wuxia novel released by Brain Lag Publishing available in all major online booksellers now.
    Visit me at Simon McNeil - the Blog for thoughts on books and stuff.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Pound Town
    Posts
    7,856
    Quote Originally Posted by lkfmdc View Post
    pin teui
    baai lin teui

    NOT back kicks, def TCMA technique
    bai lian tui is spinning back kick

    Honorary African American
    grandmaster instructor of Wombat Combat The Lost Art of Anal Destruction™®LLC .
    Senior Business Director at TEAM ASSHAMMER consulting services ™®LLC

  14. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by bawang View Post
    bai lian tui is spinning back kick
    how do you figure?

    Fu Mei teui is back kick
    maybe Luhng Mei Teui is spinning back kick
    Baai Lihn Teui is done in front of you
    Chan Tai San Book at https://www.createspace.com/4891253

    Quote Originally Posted by taai gihk yahn View Post
    well, like LKFMDC - he's a genuine Kung Fu Hero™
    Quote Originally Posted by Taixuquan99 View Post
    As much as I get annoyed when it gets derailed by the array of strange angry people that hover around him like moths, his good posts are some of my favorites.
    Quote Originally Posted by Kellen Bassette View Post
    I think he goes into a cave to meditate and recharge his chi...and bite the heads off of bats, of course....

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    CA, USA
    Posts
    4,900
    You can lessen the need to over-telegraph with the body by doing a 'whipping' crescent kick; that is, starting with the knee bent/chambered, then extending the leg (almost) straight just before contact. Say you're doing an outside crescent...if your target is at 12:00, you extend your leg at 10:00, and either bend it slightly again at 2:00, of simply keep it extended the rest of the way through. It's best to keep a slight bend in the knee at 'full extension', even though it may appear straight at contact. If you make heavy contact, you may also return your leg along the same route.

    If it's an outside crescent, if you *slightly* direct your knee outwards, it also adds some speed/torque, and noticeably lessens pressure on your knee/ankle during contact. I used to use it on the heavy bag and sometimes landed it in competition, and never hurt my knee, ankle, and never had it grabbed. If you do it right, it comes from a blind angle over the opponent's shoulder. I don't consider it a street technique, though.

    I never used the inside crescent except as a low foot sweep.
    Last edited by Jimbo; 06-25-2013 at 07:53 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •