If I try to search for my ancient root and DNA, I may find this.
http://imageshack.us/a/img24/8929/sc2cv.jpg
http://imageshack.us/a/img689/8172/sc1p.jpg
http://imageshack.us/a/img692/2203/sc4fu.jpg
Why do I want to do that for?
If I try to search for my ancient root and DNA, I may find this.
http://imageshack.us/a/img24/8929/sc2cv.jpg
http://imageshack.us/a/img689/8172/sc1p.jpg
http://imageshack.us/a/img692/2203/sc4fu.jpg
Why do I want to do that for?
http://johnswang.com
More opinion -> more argument
Less opinion -> less argument
No opinion -> no argument
I have been martial arts ever since I was a kid. I somehow I always knew things that they passed off as "tradition" were not right...
We learn this technique, it is the third thing we learn, but we can't use it in sparring? WHY?
Another school, there is no sparring, hah hah, this is clearly a joke, time to move on
School tells me they don't kick, well, what if I kick?
Lots of TCMA say they don't wrestle? Well, anyone who has ever done any sparring, much less actual fighitng, kinows there is going to be wrestling
If I try to used this "steal a peach under leaves - groin strike" in sparring,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ys8LziWtHdE
I would always get hit on my face. Since this is the 1st form that student has to learn in my system. I told my guys that the purpose of this move is to "bend down, grab a handfull of dirt (or sand), and then throw at your opponent's face". One of my smart ass guys asked me, "What if you stand on pavement road?" I was speechless. Why did the original form creator put this move into his form? I have no idea.
Last edited by YouKnowWho; 07-02-2013 at 09:18 PM.
http://johnswang.com
More opinion -> more argument
Less opinion -> less argument
No opinion -> no argument
I think (hope) you are being funny.....
right hand is striking the groin, left hand should have already moved the arm/punch aside.... or circled to trap as you turned....
not the best technique, but it has some potential I think
PS: I also think this is example of how to 'simplify" movement old teachers left out angles, sometimes forgetting that without the angle the technique is worthless
http://johnswang.com
More opinion -> more argument
Less opinion -> less argument
No opinion -> no argument
cuz ur doing it rong
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IxQWe...ature=youtu.be
Honorary African American
grandmaster instructor of Wombat Combat The Lost Art of Anal Destruction™®LLC .
Senior Business Director at TEAM ASSHAMMER consulting services ™®LLC
How will these principals effect your kung fu?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uoQB8pBxz7U
They wouldn't really. Those principles are excellent for boxing, not so good for kung fu.
A good boxing stance isn't a good kung fu stance, and a good kung fu stance isn't a good boxing stance.
He mentioned for a punch to push into the ground and lead off the front foot, and keep the heel of the back foot up. In kung fu you keep both feet planted, lead off the back foot and utilize waist rotation for power.
If you don't utilize the foundational principles and skills of kung fu, yet you try to apply kung fu techniques to the foundational principles of boxing then are you actually using kung fu?
"Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win."
- Sun Tzu
I mention this story a lot, mostly because it surprises me. I went to this school for a few months. The guy running the school learned in Taiwan from a handful of masters. He was a lineage holder and all that. He's also in the USKS hall of fame.
Sparring? Only point sparring. Continuous sparring was a rarity, I was told. IMO, the point-sparring thing was likely for tournaments.
No no no no noLots of TCMA say they don't wrestle? Well, anyone who has ever done any sparring, much less actual fighitng, kinows there is going to be wrestling
An invisible guy breaks up the fight and both fighters start on their feet again.