Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 59

Thread: Evolution of Tai Chi/Chi Kung as Martial Arts

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    San Diego, CA.
    Posts
    1,162

    Evolution of Tai Chi/Chi Kung as Martial Arts

    I was wondering how Tai Chi or Chi Kung became a standard complimentary art of hard/external TCMA. Almost all styles CLF, Mantis, Wing Chun, Shaolin, or whatever offer this soft style/ internal martial art as part of their school curriculum? How did this evolve? Is it simply a yin/yang thing?

    It occurred to me that at least locally, due to the popularity of MMA, more and more TCMA schools are now adding BJJ as the third arm of Modern TCMA. I understand this evolution, it makes them relevant and popular.

    I know Chi Kung is said to predate Tai Chi, yet Tai Chi became very relevant at some point...any thoughts?
    "if its ok for shaolin wuseng to break his vow then its ok for me to sneak behind your house at 3 in the morning and bang your dog if buddha is in your heart then its ok"-Bawang

    "I get what you have said in the past, but we are not intuitive fighters. As instinctive fighters, we can chuck spears and claw and bite. We are not instinctively god at punching or kicking."-Drake

    "Princess? LMAO hammer you are such a pr^t"-Frost

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Pound Town
    Posts
    7,856
    this is the short but complete answer for the total evolution of tai chi

    -doing forms slow and smooth was common in longfist systems for beginner training

    -supernatural powers was common part of snake oil kung fu

    -yang luchan failed the imperial exams but made enough friends to join the retinue of prince duan through backdoor.

    -Manchu riflemen were deemed too physically weak to train wrestling, they changed to training tai chi.

    -his grandson yang chengfu had the idea of mimicking the elegant slow imperial court dance, then built a new mythology to explain why his martial art had suddenly slowed to snail crawl.
    Last edited by bawang; 08-03-2013 at 06:32 PM.

    Honorary African American
    grandmaster instructor of Wombat Combat The Lost Art of Anal Destruction™®LLC .
    Senior Business Director at TEAM ASSHAMMER consulting services ™®LLC

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Western MA
    Posts
    953
    Not a historian, but I gather qigong has been a part of most styles for a very very long time. Adding taiji I believe is relatively recent and is mostly about marketing. Taiji is even more popular than Bjj.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Pound Town
    Posts
    7,856
    relatives of tai chi:

    hongdong county tongbei, with direct lineage connection to chen tai chi

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=guUn8BH7pNM

    julu village longfist, with indirect connection

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UY8uKue-orI


    you can see the similarity in the salute
    Last edited by bawang; 08-03-2013 at 10:43 PM.

    Honorary African American
    grandmaster instructor of Wombat Combat The Lost Art of Anal Destruction™®LLC .
    Senior Business Director at TEAM ASSHAMMER consulting services ™®LLC

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    IL
    Posts
    998
    It appears that when the modern era came into being (1900-I know not the exact date) the designation 'taijiquan' was born.
    1. We all know the origin was Chen family village MA
    2. We all know Chen family incorporated style of their village
    3. We all know Yang family initially got the designation but as more Chen people came to Beijing, they realized that Chen village art was the origin
    4. With modernization, they were all lumped together as part of that new taijiquan movement national treasure

    Bawang's links show that reformulation of an art is possible with the proper input and skill!

  6. #6
    Taiji's refined body mechanics was like an upgraded version of some northern styles. After it got popular some smart people also installed the update in their systems.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Pound Town
    Posts
    7,856
    Quote Originally Posted by xinyidizi View Post
    Taiji's refined body mechanics was like an upgraded version of some northern styles. After it got popular some smart people also installed the update in their systems.
    lol noe

    sdfsdfsgf

    Honorary African American
    grandmaster instructor of Wombat Combat The Lost Art of Anal Destruction™®LLC .
    Senior Business Director at TEAM ASSHAMMER consulting services ™®LLC

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    CA, USA
    Posts
    4,900
    Quote Originally Posted by Hebrew Hammer View Post
    I was wondering how Tai Chi or Chi Kung became a standard complimentary art of hard/external TCMA. Almost all styles CLF, Mantis, Wing Chun, Shaolin, or whatever offer this soft style/ internal martial art as part of their school curriculum? How did this evolve? Is it simply a yin/yang thing?

    It occurred to me that at least locally, due to the popularity of MMA, more and more TCMA schools are now adding BJJ as the third arm of Modern TCMA. I understand this evolution, it makes them relevant and popular.

    I know Chi Kung is said to predate Tai Chi, yet Tai Chi became very relevant at some point...any thoughts?
    Not only CMAists, but many karate people also do Taiji to complement their main art. One particularly famous example is (was?) Shotokan pioneer Kanazawa. He had mentioned in an interview that it taught him to use a relaxed energy to complement the hard energy of Shotokan.

    However, is Taiji more healthy than other MA? Not necessarily. I've seen many middle-aged and elderly people, some who were teachers, who trained only Taiji, who did not seem healthy at all. In fact, I knew an old man in Taipei who had been a bodybuilder when he was young, had trained some 'Shaolin', and whose main mode of exercise when I knew him was brisk walking. He literally walked circles around the other old men who taught Taiji, and was physically in superior shape, and mentally much sharper and 'alive' than they were. He was also surprisingly strong for his age (at the time, probably his late 70s or early 80s). He claimed he never studied Taiji.
    Last edited by Jimbo; 08-05-2013 at 10:41 AM.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Shell Beach, CA, USA
    Posts
    6,664
    Blog Entries
    16
    Quote Originally Posted by bawang View Post
    -doing forms slow and smooth was common in longfist systems for beginner training.
    This is not true for my branch of the longfist system. When I was young, one day I was tired from doing something else. I did my longfist form in slow motion. My longfist teacher told me that if I didn't feel like to train in "combat" speed then don't train it at all. After that day, I have never trained my longfist in slow speed. The slow speed training to me is a "bad habit" by itself.

    Even today, the slow speed training just remind me that an old man is dying. Not much youth and live energy at all.
    Last edited by YouKnowWho; 08-05-2013 at 01:35 PM.
    http://johnswang.com

    More opinion -> more argument
    Less opinion -> less argument
    No opinion -> no argument

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Lumberton, NC
    Posts
    110
    I can tell why MY sifu incorporates the tai chi he has learned from Kuo Yuen Ling. My sifu stresses the tai chi because of the suppleness and togetherness it teaches the students. It forces the body to move everything at once and this causes a tremendous amount of power to come out in connected strikes. Also it just teaches people to relax. I know when I spar I tend to get anxious and tense, but since i have been doing a lot of tai chi lately, that hasn't been the case and its easier for me to relax while hitting and getting hit.

  11. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by YouKnowWho View Post
    Even today, the slow speed training just remind me that an old man is dying. Not much youth and live energy at all.
    I know most people have accepted that Taiji has completely lost all martial application. There are still a handful that teach it as a "combat art." I have seen many people teach Taiji applications, but have never met anyone who trained it as a true combat art.

    Anyone can see that simply training slow and soft is counter intuitive to fighting. So how does one train taiji for combat? Is there anyone doing live, hard contact sparring? (Not just controlled push hands.) Is there anyone conditioning their strikes, or training strength?

    I ask this in seriousness, not to make any kind of point.....
    Quote Originally Posted by YouKnowWho View Post
    This is 100% TCMA principle. It may be used in non-TCMA also. Since I did learn it from TCMA, I have to say it's TCMA principle.
    Quote Originally Posted by YouKnowWho View Post
    We should not use "TCMA is more than combat" as excuse for not "evolving".

    You can have Kung Fu in cooking, it really has nothing to do with fighting!

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Pound Town
    Posts
    7,856
    Quote Originally Posted by Kellen Bassette View Post

    Anyone can see that simply training slow and soft is counter intuitive to fighting. So how does one train taiji for combat?
    lift weights in secret

    Honorary African American
    grandmaster instructor of Wombat Combat The Lost Art of Anal Destruction™®LLC .
    Senior Business Director at TEAM ASSHAMMER consulting services ™®LLC

  13. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by Kellen Bassette View Post
    I know most people have accepted that Taiji has completely lost all martial application. There are still a handful that teach it as a "combat art." I have seen many people teach Taiji applications, but have never met anyone who trained it as a true combat art.

    Anyone can see that simply training slow and soft is counter intuitive to fighting. So how does one train taiji for combat? Is there anyone doing live, hard contact sparring? (Not just controlled push hands.) Is there anyone conditioning their strikes, or training strength?

    I ask this in seriousness, not to make any kind of point.....
    People train slowly as part of their training so that they can develop better body coordination, understand Jin and fix their stiffness so that they can move faster and more powerful. Dai xinyi people spend a lot of time on internal development and slow training. Tell me if this dai xinyi guy is not fast enough:
    http://www.56.com/u94/v_Nzk3MDY2MTE.html
    Last edited by xinyidizi; 08-05-2013 at 07:25 PM.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Shell Beach, CA, USA
    Posts
    6,664
    Blog Entries
    16
    Quote Originally Posted by xinyidizi View Post
    People train slowly as part of their training so that they can develop better body coordination, understand Jin and fix their stiffness so that they can move faster and more powerful.
    How long do people need to train slow in order to "develop better body coordination, understand Jin and fix their stiffness"? 3 years? 5 years? 10 years? 20 years?

    What if peole just did slow training all their life and have never tried the fast training method at all?

    If slow is to achieve fast then "the older that you are, the faster that you should move". This just don't seem to be the case for some Taiji people.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vsDPy7zMrA4
    Last edited by YouKnowWho; 08-05-2013 at 06:12 PM.
    http://johnswang.com

    More opinion -> more argument
    Less opinion -> less argument
    No opinion -> no argument

  15. #15
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Lumberton, NC
    Posts
    110
    It's not really a question of how long it takes. Our bodies always get better and stronger, that's why Sifu introduces it from day 1. It's just one of those things you never stop training. So yeah, it all depends on if you get content with your abilities. But that itself goes against gong fu. Human excellence is never achieved, we just strive for it.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •