Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 44

Thread: It's not in the forms

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Shell Beach, CA, USA
    Posts
    6,664
    Blog Entries
    16

    It's not in the forms

    A: The WC system doesn't have "hip throw".
    B: There are over 20 + kind of "hip throw" in WC. They are just not in the WC forms.

    A: The Taiji system doesn't have "flying side kick".
    B: There are over 20 + kind of "flying side kick" in Taiji. They are just not in the Taiji forms.

    A: The longfist system doesn't have "flying knee".
    B: There are over 20 + kind of "flying knee" in longfist. They are just not in the longfist forms.

    Who is right? A or B?

    How will you be able to know that a certain technique is not from "cross training" if it's not in the forms? Your thought?
    Last edited by YouKnowWho; 08-06-2013 at 06:14 PM.
    http://johnswang.com

    More opinion -> more argument
    Less opinion -> less argument
    No opinion -> no argument

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    2,111
    Quote Originally Posted by YouKnowWho View Post
    How will you be able to know that a certain technique is not from "cross training" if it's not in the forms? Your thought?
    Have a legit teacher and pay attention?

  3. #3
    How do you know a teacher is legit? Is lineage enough? Does that guarantee there was no cross training? How do you know your sigung didn't add stuff? Define legit.

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Syn7 View Post
    Define legit.

    Quote Originally Posted by YouKnowWho View Post
    This is 100% TCMA principle. It may be used in non-TCMA also. Since I did learn it from TCMA, I have to say it's TCMA principle.
    Quote Originally Posted by YouKnowWho View Post
    We should not use "TCMA is more than combat" as excuse for not "evolving".

    You can have Kung Fu in cooking, it really has nothing to do with fighting!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Great Lakes State, U.S.A.
    Posts
    1,645
    Hammer Fist?

  6. #6
    Too legit to quit....
    Quote Originally Posted by YouKnowWho View Post
    This is 100% TCMA principle. It may be used in non-TCMA also. Since I did learn it from TCMA, I have to say it's TCMA principle.
    Quote Originally Posted by YouKnowWho View Post
    We should not use "TCMA is more than combat" as excuse for not "evolving".

    You can have Kung Fu in cooking, it really has nothing to do with fighting!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Shell Beach, CA, USA
    Posts
    6,664
    Blog Entries
    16
    My teacher integrated XingYi Pi Chuan into his Taiji "cross leg". If I didn't know that my teacher had "cross training" in the XingYi system, I may think that Pi Chuan exists in the Taiji system.
    http://johnswang.com

    More opinion -> more argument
    Less opinion -> less argument
    No opinion -> no argument

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by YouKnowWho View Post
    My teacher integrated XingYi Pi Chuan into his Taiji "cross leg". If I didn't know that my teacher had "cross training" in the XingYi system, I may think that Pi Chuan exists in the Taiji system.
    Maybe it does now, if his students are teaching it that way.
    Quote Originally Posted by YouKnowWho View Post
    This is 100% TCMA principle. It may be used in non-TCMA also. Since I did learn it from TCMA, I have to say it's TCMA principle.
    Quote Originally Posted by YouKnowWho View Post
    We should not use "TCMA is more than combat" as excuse for not "evolving".

    You can have Kung Fu in cooking, it really has nothing to do with fighting!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    CA, USA
    Posts
    4,900
    Quote Originally Posted by YouKnowWho View Post
    A: The WC system doesn't have "hip throw".
    B: There are over 20 + kind of "hip throw" in WC. They are just not in the WC forms.

    A: The Taiji system doesn't have "flying side kick".
    B: There are over 20 + kind of "flying side kick" in Taiji. They are just not in the Taiji forms.

    A: The longfist system doesn't have "flying knee".
    B: There are over 20 + kind of "flying knee" in longfist. They are just not in the longfist forms.

    Who is right? A or B?

    How will you be able to know that a certain technique is not from "cross training" if it's not in the forms? Your thought?
    Why couldn't er qi jiao (jumping front kick) in Long Fist be a flying knee? If you simply modify it by not kicking out your lower leg and extending the knee forward instead?

    Then someone might say, 'Well then, why not just do a flying knee?'

    Forms are stylized representations of fighting movements or ideas interlinked in preset patterns. As we all know, in many instances, actual applications often look different from the way the move is done in the form. A form is dead, no matter how much 'life' you may try to interject into it. Any technique becomes alive only when its concepts are absorbed by some level of understanding and ability to apply it outside of preset conditions. It's highly unlikely anyone could do that with every technique in any given form. So forms are not a necessity for fighting, but if kept in perspective, can have their place for a practitioner. They're a good method of training the body to move from unique positions you wouldn't make in ordinary life.

    All MA styles are a result of cross-training. Why do Japanese and many Okinawan karate practitioners place such emphasis on roundhouse kicks when those aren't in their forms? I would be surprised if a teacher's way of practicing wasn't colored in some way by his own personal experience, and that means familiarity with other methods.
    Last edited by Jimbo; 08-06-2013 at 07:43 PM.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Pound Town
    Posts
    7,856
    Quote Originally Posted by YouKnowWho View Post

    Who is right? A or B?

    How will you be able to know that a certain technique is not from "cross training" if it's not in the forms? Your thought?
    somebody say everything is in the form, you are not happy. I say not everything is in a form, you are still not happy. a form is a seed and an example. its not an encyclopedia.
    Quote Originally Posted by YouKnowWho View Post

    How will you be able to know that a certain technique is not from "cross training" if it's not in the forms? Your thought?
    there is no shame from "cross training"
    Last edited by bawang; 08-06-2013 at 08:37 PM.

    Honorary African American
    grandmaster instructor of Wombat Combat The Lost Art of Anal Destruction™®LLC .
    Senior Business Director at TEAM ASSHAMMER consulting services ™®LLC

  11. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by YouKnowWho View Post
    A: The longfist system doesn't have "flying knee".
    B: There are over 20 + kind of "flying knee" in longfist. They are just not in the longfist forms.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FT6SSyAyjv4

    I think you could interpret the move at 0:04 as a flying knee. This may be a modern form, but does that matter? I guess the next question is were you using the term "Long Fist" specifically or generically? Does that include Shaolin or Ying Jow Pai, both which teach this form in some schools....
    Quote Originally Posted by YouKnowWho View Post
    This is 100% TCMA principle. It may be used in non-TCMA also. Since I did learn it from TCMA, I have to say it's TCMA principle.
    Quote Originally Posted by YouKnowWho View Post
    We should not use "TCMA is more than combat" as excuse for not "evolving".

    You can have Kung Fu in cooking, it really has nothing to do with fighting!

  12. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by Jimbo View Post

    All MA styles are a result of cross-training. Why do Japanese and many Okinawan karate practitioners place such emphasis on roundhouse kicks when those aren't in their forms?
    I know...right???
    Quote Originally Posted by YouKnowWho View Post
    This is 100% TCMA principle. It may be used in non-TCMA also. Since I did learn it from TCMA, I have to say it's TCMA principle.
    Quote Originally Posted by YouKnowWho View Post
    We should not use "TCMA is more than combat" as excuse for not "evolving".

    You can have Kung Fu in cooking, it really has nothing to do with fighting!

  13. #13
    Personally, I always thought of purity as a lack of sophistication. But that's just me.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Lostin Austin
    Posts
    857
    Blog Entries
    3
    It seems that when you become a student of principles, styles matter less and less.
    The 10 Elements of Choy Lay Fut:
    Kum, Na, Gwa, Sau, Chop, Pow, Kup, Biu, Ding, Jong

    The 13 Principles of Taijiquan:
    Ward Off, Roll Back, Press, Push, Pluck, Elbow, Shoulder, Split, Forward, Back, Left, Right, Central Equilibrium

    And it doesn't hurt to practice stuff from:
    Mounts, Guards, and Side Mounts!


    Austin Kung-Fu Academy

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canada!
    Posts
    23,110
    Quote Originally Posted by yutyeesam View Post
    It seems that when you become a student of principles, styles matter less and less.
    There you go.
    Kung Fu is good for you.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •