Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 29 of 29

Thread: Wing Chun Interactions, the key to individual expression

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    ᏌᏂᎭᎢ, ᏥᎾ
    Posts
    3,257
    Quote Originally Posted by T_Ray View Post
    In Wslpbvt chi sao is a learning environment.....In other lineages it seems to be an ego driven pi$$ing contest.

    You can see with Philipp, Shawn is being taught and helped.
    With the others its the usual two handed arm wrestling proving ground
    Chi-sau is developmental unique to each lineage. For that reason no one should chi-sau with others outside their lineage, because neither understands the other's method. It just becomes, as you say, a proving ground.

    If they want to test their skills against other lineages, their testing ground should be in free sparring. Unfortunately, free sparring seems to be very rarely done in most Wing Chun lineages. Chi-sau is king.

  2. #17
    Quote Originally Posted by T_Ray View Post
    You can see with Philipp, Shawn is being taught and helped.
    With the others its the usual two handed arm wrestling proving ground
    To be fair, Boztepe was talking throughout the clip shown, showing and explaining.
    No mocking, tongue-in-cheek signature here... move on.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    2,252
    Chi-sau is developmental unique to each lineage. For that reason no one should chi-sau with others outside their lineage, because neither understands the other's method. It just becomes, as you say, a proving ground.
    What a load of nonsense, thats like saying boxers from different gyms shouldnt hold pads for eachother

    If they want to test their skills against other lineages, their testing ground should be in free sparring. Unfortunately, free sparring seems to be very rarely done in most Wing Chun lineages. Chi-sau is king.
    Ive had great experiences with schools comparing techniques, ideas , power generation, footwork and son on without having to spar.

    Thats a limited view you have

  4. #19
    Quote Originally Posted by LFJ View Post
    Chi-sau is developmental unique to each lineage. For that reason no one should chi-sau with others outside their lineage, because neither understands the other's method. It just becomes, as you say, a proving ground. [...]
    I don't know. I have been lucky in that I have, now, been able to chi sau with people from many different lineages. Our dispositions have all been very positive and the only trouble or difficulty in chi sau we have experienced, has been the fact that we do it differently and some translation has to occur before it becomes a mutual conversation.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    North London, England
    Posts
    3,003

    Personal expression?

    So looking at the posts am I right in thinking that most of you can identify lineage through watching students practise Chisau?

    I know we all have differences but it would be interesting to hear if anyone has written a summary of each lineages characteristics, and as there are clearly variations within a lineage has anyone written a comparison?

    It would be great if Shaun himself has documented his own opinions of his experiences but maybe we could work on something here with contributions by everyone.
    Last edited by LoneTiger108; 08-23-2013 at 12:46 PM.
    Ti Fei
    詠春國術

  6. #21
    Quote Originally Posted by LoneTiger108 View Post
    So looking at the posts am I right in thinking that most of you can identify lineage through watching students practise Chisau?

    I know we all have differences but it would be interesting to hear if anyone has written a summary of each lineages characteristics, and as there are clearly variations within a lineage has anyone written a comparison?

    It would be great if Shaun himself has documented his own opinions of his experiences but maybe we could work on something here with contributions by everyone.
    Should all be the same.

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    North London, England
    Posts
    3,003
    Quote Originally Posted by k gledhill View Post
    Should all be the same.
    Kinda what I thought when I was training with Sifu and had never seen anyone else! But the facts are right in front of us. We are not the same so what is the best way forward?

    If there are massive positives to all interactions we see, and negatives too of course, what would the ultimate 'blended' interaction actually look and feel like?

    Just on a question spree of late and as a student and journeyman I would want to read a bit of decent research on this type of subject rather than participate in all the craziness and negativity I have seen more of lately
    Ti Fei
    詠春國術

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    North London, England
    Posts
    3,003
    Hmmm... Maybe I should have started this thread saying that ALL the interactions of Chisau in the clip are WRONG and that I have the only true complete Wing Chun interaction that nobody has even seen yet

    Seems that a decent discussion is impossible these days...
    Ti Fei
    詠春國術

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    ᏌᏂᎭᎢ, ᏥᎾ
    Posts
    3,257
    Quote Originally Posted by Paddington View Post
    I don't know. I have been lucky in that I have, now, been able to chi sau with people from many different lineages. Our dispositions have all been very positive and the only trouble or difficulty in chi sau we have experienced, has been the fact that we do it differently and some translation has to occur before it becomes a mutual conversation.
    All I have to say is people need to quit chi-sauing and get out there and spar or actually fight. If it's all about chi-sau and when you meet another WC practitioner you say hey let's chi-sau then it just becomes your favorite game. You're goal is just to get better at chi-sau and you lose sight of the real goal of training; fight survival. WC is then no longer a fighting method.

    Chi-sau is a mutual developmental tool used in training within your lineage to train the fighting skills your lineage seeks to develop. There's no point in doing the drill with someone who has completely different thinking, lest it become a competitive game or just something fun to do.

    WC practitioners from other lineages should first say hey let's spar/fight like meeting anyone from any other martial art. But I kind of fear no one actually knows what that is.

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    North London, England
    Posts
    3,003
    Quote Originally Posted by LFJ View Post
    Chi-sau is a mutual developmental tool used in training within your lineage to train the fighting skills your lineage seeks to develop. There's no point in doing the drill with someone who has completely different thinking, lest it become a competitive game or just something fun to do.
    Forgetting the 'fight' for a second, I was always of the belief that Wing Chun Chisau, as it is generally practised from Ip Man and others, was designed for students to play and search for answers in a non-competitive and fun way.

    Agreed sparring is a different animal, and so is fighting, which both benefit from Chisau practise when trained well enough, but I was really looking for input here from people who can actually appreciate our signature and speciality.

    Why is there so much difference in all of us and does this mean we are all missing something of the bigger picture? After all, it is accepted by the majority I reckon that we can only truly learn and exchange, as Wing Chun students and teachers, from 'touching hands'. Right?
    Ti Fei
    詠春國術

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    482
    Quote Originally Posted by LoneTiger108 View Post
    ....After all, it is accepted by the majority I reckon that we can only truly learn and exchange, as Wing Chun students and teachers, from 'touching hands'. Right?
    It depends less on lineage than the personality and ego of the person you choose to train with. With the right person it can work fine. Attitude is everything.
    "No contaban con mi astucia!" --el Chapulin Colorado

    http://www.vingtsunaz.com/
    www.nationalvt.com/

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    North London, England
    Posts
    3,003
    Quote Originally Posted by Grumblegeezer View Post
    It depends less on lineage than the personality and ego of the person you choose to train with. With the right person it can work fine. Attitude is everything.
    Well said.

    It's just that looking through this forum and seeing even further debates on things like Facebook you would think that everybody wants Wing Chun to be divided into little lineage boxes for everyone to identify and talk sh1t about lol!

    Now I'm a lineage type guy, I appreciate my heritage in that way, loyal to only one teacher too, but it doesn't make me automatically look for the negatives in everything I see, in fact quite the opposite.

    I see many good things with the original clip on the thread, minus certain attitudes. So I guess nobody has the answers for me here. Everybody is happy being so divided?
    Ti Fei
    詠春國術

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    ᏌᏂᎭᎢ, ᏥᎾ
    Posts
    3,257
    Quote Originally Posted by LoneTiger108 View Post
    So I guess nobody has the answers for me here. Everybody is happy being so divided?
    I am happy to consider different lineages to be indeed different systems. While sharing the same form names and whatnot, they can be so different in execution and interpretation that they may as well be different martial art systems altogether. That's not just me wanting to be divisive. That's just the way it is.

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    North London, England
    Posts
    3,003
    Quote Originally Posted by LFJ View Post
    I am happy to consider different lineages to be indeed different systems. While sharing the same form names and whatnot, they can be so different in execution and interpretation that they may as well be different martial art systems altogether. That's not just me wanting to be divisive. That's just the way it is.
    And I understand this, which brings me back to the Title of this Thread...

    So, on review it isn't just about the interactive platforms being a key to individual expression, we seem to have individual expression of all the forms too then we will have individual expression of the equipment and weaponry we use right?

    What a mess
    Ti Fei
    詠春國術

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •