View Poll Results: Will you pick Taiji as your primary art if combat is your goal?

Voters
17. You may not vote on this poll
  • YES

    2 11.76%
  • NO

    15 88.24%
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 25 of 25

Thread: Will you pick Taiji as your primary art if combat is your goal?

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Shell Beach, CA, USA
    Posts
    6,664
    Blog Entries
    16
    Quote Originally Posted by jimbob View Post
    John - you need to clarify what you mean by 'combat'.
    According to American Combat Shuai Chiao Association, the word "combat" is defined as "the integration of kick, punch, lock, throw, and following up striking".

    http://combatshuaichiao.com/main.html

    When David C. K. Lin was hired to teach Sionics, a prestigious Georgia-based Anti-terrorism school. He found out that his students in that school (CIA agents, FBI agents, president's body guards, ...) were not interest in tournament winning but "how to take care bad guys", the training was evolved and the term "combat" was used since then.
    Last edited by YouKnowWho; 09-16-2013 at 11:35 AM.
    http://johnswang.com

    More opinion -> more argument
    Less opinion -> less argument
    No opinion -> no argument

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Pound Town
    Posts
    7,856
    combat is a little baby cow that has just been born and not yet opened its eyes, its purple like an eggplant

    Honorary African American
    grandmaster instructor of Wombat Combat The Lost Art of Anal Destruction™®LLC .
    Senior Business Director at TEAM ASSHAMMER consulting services ™®LLC

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Shell Beach, CA, USA
    Posts
    6,664
    Blog Entries
    16
    Quote Originally Posted by David Jamieson View Post
    If combat is my goal, I will join the army and learn what they teach.
    I assume if you train something like this, you can call yourself training "combat".

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2WsCqlvOGGg

    In

    - "sport", you are not allow to do so.
    - "self-defense", you may not want to hurt your opponent this bad.

    So what will you call your training if you don't use the word "combat"?
    Last edited by YouKnowWho; 09-16-2013 at 12:38 PM.
    http://johnswang.com

    More opinion -> more argument
    Less opinion -> less argument
    No opinion -> no argument

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    1,002
    Quote Originally Posted by YouKnowWho View Post
    I assume if you train something like this, you can call yourself training "combat".

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2WsCqlvOGGg

    In

    - "sport", you are not allow to do so.
    - "self-defense", you may not want to hurt your opponent this bad.

    So what will you call your training if you don't use the word "combat"?
    That is pretty much why we use the word as well. It doesn't mean you only want to have those type of responses on call, but it does mean we train them.
    -Golden Arms-

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canada!
    Posts
    23,110
    Quote Originally Posted by YouKnowWho View Post
    I assume if you train something like this, you can call yourself training "combat".

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2WsCqlvOGGg

    In

    - "sport", you are not allow to do so.
    - "self-defense", you may not want to hurt your opponent this bad.

    So what will you call your training if you don't use the word "combat"?
    Just training. That's all it is until you use it.
    Kung Fu is good for you.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    4,381
    Quote Originally Posted by YouKnowWho View Post
    I assume if you train something like this, you can call yourself training "combat".

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2WsCqlvOGGg

    In

    - "sport", you are not allow to do so.
    - "self-defense", you may not want to hurt your opponent this bad.

    So what will you call your training if you don't use the word "combat"?
    actually in sport you could do that...how I miss the early pride shows lol
    I hate to do this but I have to agree with DJ that's not combat its training just like throat strikes and eye gauges aren't combat but technique applications

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Midgard
    Posts
    10,852
    if you are strictly training so that you can use your skills that you are building in combat, then technically you are training combatives.

    the moment adjustments are made for 'fairness' you have just changed what you are training from combat to art/sport.


    'Fair fight' is a myth. No fight is fair.
    For whoso comes amongst many shall one day find that no one man is by so far the mightiest of all.

  8. #23
    Quote Originally Posted by YouKnowWho View Post
    I assume if you train something like this, you can call yourself training "combat".
    So if your throwing demo is combat then why this Chen taiji guy's throws shouldn't be called combat?

    www.youtube.com/watch?v=tb-__XJ1zQg

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Shell Beach, CA, USA
    Posts
    6,664
    Blog Entries
    16
    Quote Originally Posted by xinyidizi View Post
    So if your throwing demo is combat then why this Chen taiji guy's throws shouldn't be called combat?

    www.youtube.com/watch?v=tb-__XJ1zQg
    This is just my definition. If you

    - just throw your opponent down and end right there, it's "sport".
    - choke/knock your opponent out after your throwing, that's "combat".

    To me, "'combat" require "finish moves". Most of the "finish moves" after throwing can either be choke your opponent out by your ground game, or knock your opponent out by your stand up game.

    If you do consider "ground game" or "follow up striking", the way that you will throw your opponent and the way that you will force your opponent to land are important.

    If you training

    - include that, you are training "combat".
    - don't include that, you are training "sport".
    Last edited by YouKnowWho; 09-16-2013 at 10:37 PM.
    http://johnswang.com

    More opinion -> more argument
    Less opinion -> less argument
    No opinion -> no argument

  10. #25
    Quote Originally Posted by YouKnowWho View Post
    This is just my definition. If you

    - just throw your opponent down and end right there, it's "sport".
    - choke/knock your opponent out after your throwing, that's "combat".

    To me, "'combat" require "finish moves". Most of the "finish moves" after throwing can either be choke your opponent out by your ground game, or knock your opponent out by your stand up game.

    If you do consider "ground game" or "follow up striking", the way that you will throw your opponent and the way that he will land are important.

    If you training

    - include that, you are training "combat".
    - don't include that, you are training "sport".
    In that video just like you the taiji guy can also easily choke or kick his opponents head if he chooses to and traditionally taiji combat is taught that way but we can just pretend doing the finishing move in training. So in that case taiji is an effective combat martial art.

    Pushing people far away is for demos and competitions where you can lose points for falling from the leitai. In traditional taiji you want them to fall close and down so that you can finish them ideally at the same time that the land. Even if you push them it's to prepare them for the follow up strikes like in the canon fist.
    Last edited by xinyidizi; 09-17-2013 at 03:37 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •