No, for two reasons. One, it's not clear what a 'good' kung fu style is - and this is then usuallly a tautological argument in that people will answer "one that has both internal and external aspects".
Secondly, there aren't many schools which encourage intutive exploration of inate skill and insight - most encourage rigid adherence to form or externally imposed coaching practice. I think this is partly why people often feel the need to 'brealk' with their schools, so that they can finally begin to experiment a bit with their own ideas. Unfortunately, those people so often then try to impose those ideas yet again on others as a prison for body and mind, rathe than recognising that it's freedom of intuition that matters in the first place, and which has to be built into the training practice.
This is the usual line, but it's only half true which is the problem. Without 'you', in fact, wushu is not complete. Wushu only exists as the 'great achievement' that is you, and the combination of your training method, insight, ability, discipline etc. In the sclerotic traditional systems as they've become now, the 'style' and religious discipline to the school and master have been massively over emphasised, leading to low level outputs. Without you, the wushu is not complete - but it's not enough for 'you' just to be there, at the club. 'You' have to be actively engaged with the material in a way other than just external copying.