Page 1 of 12 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 180

Thread: Inside the Yik Kam Cho Gar vs Hendrik Santos CONTROVERSY

  1. #1

    Inside the Yik Kam Cho Gar vs Hendrik Santos CONTROVERSY

    I have been doing some reading and I find what is conveniently ignored by the disciple of Cho Hung Choy. This informations come from inside the Cho Gar family members. It is the same group that is the direct source of Cho Hung Choy’s kung fu the Ban Chung Zheng Dan Kam Cho Gar Wing Chun clan in Malaysia. Some here already dismiss their public announcement as false to counter the Cho family denouncement contradicting Hendrik Santos. But to dismiss is not enough by any means to prove it as false in my book. Some questions also conveniently ignored but need to be ask and hopefully everyone who reading this [supporter and against alike] will consider.

    Claim – Hendrik Santos is sole successor of Yik Kam Cho Gar Wing Chun by his Sifu Cho Hung Choy.
    Claim – Hendrik Santos publicly claim Ermei 12 palms system is the mother art of all Wing Chun.
    Claim – Hendrik Santos publicly claim if WCK is without Ermei 12 palms system it is not WCK.
    Claim – Hendrik Santos publicly claim all WCK without the core of Ermei will die out between one generation and 30 yrs time.
    Claim – Hendrik Santos just sharing his story unbias leave it up to public to accept


    Before we can understand we must look at big picture. Take look at who is Cho Hung Choy and Cho Gar clan first before understanding Hendrik.

    From Cho Gar family member Patrick Tham on FB, WC Malaysia page.

    There is a drastic difference between students and disciples. The actual forms were only taught to immediate family members. Whereas those learning in schools within the Cho village were only taught modified forms. The original 108 complete single form was used to modify Hung Kuen, Choy Lay Fatt, etc and taught to the students. Cho Onn also did not teach the original form to his early students including Cho Hung Choy, Yeung Kam Jiang, Hendrick Santos and others. Until today, the original form is only imparted to selected closed door disciples.

    None of the elders in Cho Ga has knowledge about Yik Kam's Siu Lim Tao having a hybrid of Emei 12 form ad claimed by Hendrick Santos. It is a fabrication of his own imagination.

    Hendrik Santos is indeed Cho Hung Choy's disciple. No doubt about it. But Cho Hung Choy was not Cho Onn's nephew at all. He was just someone from the Cho Village in Punyu that Cho Onn was asked to bring to Nanyang as those days it was difficult to clear the immigration unless they claim to be immediate family members. When Cho Hung Choy was older, Cho Onn brought him back to Punyu to marry one of the village girls. He did not learn any martial art while he was back at the village. This was told to some of us by the Cho Ga elders when we were back at Punyu.
    According to elders of Yik Kam and Cho Gar families who are the seniors and peers of Cho Hung Choy he was not nephew of Cho Onn. He was not family at all but was someone from the Cho Village in Punyu. Cho Onn was ask to smuggle him to Nanyang because in those days it was very difficult to clear to immigration without being actual family member so Cho Onn help him immigrate. When Cho Hung Choy was older age then Cho Onn took him back to Punyu only for purposes of marrying a village girl. He did not learn any kung fu from Cho Chuen when going back to Cho village. This is very important to understand

    Now look at tradition of Cho Gar clan. As difference between student and disciple is great also as family member vs outsider. What that means is it helps to understand tradition and culture of Cho Family and how they pass knowledge. Cho Gar elders explain publicly that core art of Ban Chung Zheng Dan Kam Cho Gar Wing Chun only reserved for immediate family members. Students learning at Cho village who not family members only access to modified forms and trainings. The Ban Chung Zheng Dan Kam Cho Gar Wing Chun original 108 long form is complete and intact, and is source for modifying Choy Li Fut, Hung Kuen, other arts. Original complete system is not taught to outsiders and students but preserve and exist today with family members and closed door disciples internally only.

    Cho Onn is family member insider. As facts presented by Cho Gar family elders Cho Onn did not teach original form to the students per tradition. He did teach only modified method to Cho Hung Choy Yeung Kam Jiang, Hendrik Santos, all other outsiders. Cho Gar family tradition is maintain still today. Original core teaching is prserve for family member and close-door disciples only. Another declaration by Ban Chung Zheng Dan Kam Cho Gar Wing Chun clan is publicly declares “none of the elders in Cho Gar have any knowledge about Yik Kam’s Siu Lim Tao having a hybrid of Emei 12 form as claimed by Hendrik Santos. It is a fabrication of his own imagination.”

    Fact – Cho Hung Choy not family member of Cho Gar family
    Fact – difference in knowledge impart to students vs closed door disciples
    Fact – Cho Hung Choy not learn original family art of Cho Gar family
    Fact – Cho Hung Choy only receive modified knowledge from Cho Gar original art
    Fact – Cho Gar family insiders denounce Hendrik’s claim of Yik Kam Cho Gar kung fu have anything to do with Emei 12 Palms system.
    Last edited by VT Andy; 05-09-2014 at 10:32 AM.

  2. #2
    Cho Gar family member Carlos Kennerly:

    “Nga Wu village was the home of Yik Gam and Cho Family. It where Cho Yin On came from and where Cho Chuen remained. Research these two names.

    As a self proclaimed researcher H. Santo has ignored a part of and the source of his own lineages Kung Fu some people would find this strange if you or other don't then fair enough...

    H. Santo has said openly many times everyone from Cho Family lineages in SEA and China have lost the true wing chun "engine" (including the people he calls Siheng) stating Hung Kuen or CLF engines.

    Cho Bak Lun learnt from his father (Cho Chuen) all his life until his fathers passing.
    Ku Cho Wah learnt from his uncle Lau Soon Yeun since 1968 and from Cho Yin On directly since 1972 until his passing in 1993. In 1986 he was chosen by Cho Yin On as his inheritor.

    Apparently only H. Santo knows the true WC of Cho Family or Yik Kam and the blood descendants and inheritors have lost what was pasted down father to son and from master to chosen inheritor.

    How many years did H. Santo learn from his Sifu before leaving for the US at the same time doing Karate.....?

    Is he a Chi Kung expert most probably, is his chi kung exercise good for you and cure your bad back most probably.

    Does H. Santo have Cho Family flavour and application? not from what I can see or from what he has explained in his many video's BUT this is just my personal opinion from my own hands on experiences (as a poor student) with Family Elders in SEA and China over the last 8 years.


    Am I saying H. Santo did not learn Cho Family WC... NO, of course not. I know he learnt in Cho Hong Choi's School in Malaysia.
    I am saying what he is doing or saying is rubbish....NO.
    Have I touched hands with him...No.

    For all I know he may be a genius! and I wish him well with his continue with his evolution of his own WC.

    Carlos Kennerley”
    No one in Cho Gar clan dispute that Hendrik Santos is disciple of Cho Hung Choy for sure. Certainly as Hendrik show to internet world his letter as proof endorsement he can spread Cho Hung Choy teachings. But, Cho Hung Choy was not ever successor/head of Cho Gar family clan. How can someone who not a successor of a clan create a successor for the clan? That would be call mutiny. Grandmaster Ku Choi Wah is one recognize as the head of Ban Chung Zheng Dan Kam Cho Gar Wing Chun clan, just as one body can only have one head, one country can only have one president, one family can only have one father. The source of Hendrik’s Yik Kam Cho Gar education still exist today.

    The dispute appears that no one in branch clan in Penang Malaysia apparently aware that GM Ku was appointed as successor of the clan. GM Ku publicly announce no threats are made to Hendrik Santos but they also do not recognize Hendrik Santos as any person of authority to do with their clan. He cannot speak for them or represent them but has been doing for a long time free to make claims after claims. Now the chief of Ban Chung Zheng Dan Kam Cho Gar Wing Chun clan and protector of their art makes clear to all people what is what and who knows what. Penang branch clan of Cho Gar recognize their root, but does Hendrik or does he ignores the Cho Gar descendants like they don’t exist?

    Question – Why has Hendrik never communicate to GM Ku Choi Wah? Why?
    Question – If Cho Hung Choy only learn modified art, then does that mean Hendrik Santos also does not have complete original art from Ban Chung Zheng Dan Kam Cho Gar Wing Chun clan?
    Question – If Hendrik Santos only learn modified Cho Gar Wing Chun from Cho Hung Choy Sifu, why has he not go to source of Cho Gar to complete his learning the original clan art?
    Question – Why does Hendrik Santos avoid elders of Ban Chung Zheng Dan Kam Cho Gar Wing Chun clan since they still preserve complete art?
    Question – How can Hendrik Santos be successor of Yik Kam Cho Gar Wing Chun when he only learn modified version from Cho Hung Choy who learn modified version from Cho Onn?

    What is clear as demonstrated and record on this forum with testimony from key partys?

    1. There is no Ermei 12 Zhuang in original art and teachings of Ban Chung Zheng Dam Kam Cho Gar Wing Chun
    2. Cho Hung Choy did not learn Ermei Sup Yi Zhuang, and never was a Yik Kam Cho Gar successor.
    3. Hendrik did not learn Ermei Sup Yi Zhuang from Cho Hung Choy
    4. Hendrik refuse to accept these facts from actual insiders of core Cho Gar family
    5. Hendrik either does not know he only learned modified Cho Gar or refuse to be honest about it
    6. Hendrik look to fill his modified Cho Gar Wing Chun by mimicking Ermei books and internet video
    7. Hendrik is sole person fabricating and imagining connection of Yik Kam Cho Gar Wing Chun to outsider arts
    8. Hendrik is reinventing Yik Kam and Cho Gar family history and spreading it to community
    9. Hendrik avoids direct questions and distracts others to prove his ideas for him as form of crafting deception
    10. Hendrik using GM Fu as scapegoat and goose chase for avoiding public heat
    11. Hendrik efforts is denounce by his original ancestor clan who still exist today
    12. Hendrik efforts denounce by Snake and Crane clan for misusing and twisting their Kuit for his personal theory
    13. Hendrik rely on fabrication and imagination for 30 years but avoiding Cho Family members all this time
    14. Hendrik cannot name any Ermei Snake Crane Sifu he get legit training from to back up his 30 years of imagination
    15. Hendrik always always overstep and try to speak for all Wing Chun clans 24/7 broken record until people believe him
    16. Hendrik not qualified to represent Ban Chung Zheng Dam Kam Cho Gar Wing Chun Clan and their Kung Fu
    17. Hendrik is spreading lies about Ban Chung Zheng Dam Kam Cho Gar Wing Chun Clan and their Kung Fu
    18. Hendrik not qualified to represent other Wing Chun clans
    19. Hendrik only endorse by Cho Hung Choy to spread Cho Hung Choy’s teachings
    20. Hendrik is self appoint researcher and self appoint successor of Cho Gar, not recognize by anyone.
    21. Hendrik is not honest in his misleading the public pretending to wear Buddhist robe and lying about being Yik Kam Cho Gar successor.
    Last edited by VT Andy; 05-09-2014 at 10:34 AM.

  3. #3
    Bloody Fantastic! Thank you for a wonderful and interesting post!

    Ron Goninan
    China Fuzhou Zhenlan Crane Boxing Australia
    White Crane Research Institute Inc
    http://www.whitecranegongfu.info
    A seeker of the way

  4. #4
    excellent excellent questions,
    i will reply for one last time as a public record for the wck researchers of the present and future.




    Question – Why has Hendrik never communicate to GM Ku Choi Wah? Why?


    answer : Hendrik met Ku Choi Wah in 2000 in singapore, at Ku Choi Wah's student Ian's house. Ku was living in Ian House at that time. and Hendrik meet many Ku students: Ian, Nigel, Bertran.....etc. Ku was asking Hendrik to share Hendrik insight in Cho family WCK to his students.

    Hendrik let Ku choi wah video tape Hendrik or Cho Hung Choy 's Yik kam SLT and woodern dummy set .
    Evidence of Ku chai wah and Hendrik sharing had been presented many times in KFO .




    Question – If Cho Hung Choy only learn modified art, then does that mean Hendrik Santos also does not have complete original art from Ban Chung Zheng Dan Kam Cho Gar Wing Chun clan?


    answer: Cho Hung Choy is the first WCK student of GM Cho Onn . He has inherited from Cho Onn the original complete art of Yik kam SLT with kuen kuit. Cho Hung Choy is one of the recognized elderly of Cho family by the old timers of Cho Gar, and the person who responsible on many Kong Sau in Penang Malaysia represent Wing chun kuen and Cho gar. evidence had been presented many times in KFO.

    "if " simply doesnt exist . it is just your creative imagination.





    Question – If Hendrik Santos only learn modified Cho Gar Wing Chun from Cho Hung Choy Sifu, why has he not go to source of Cho Gar to complete his learning the original clan art?

    answer: Hendrik Santo has inherited a complete art of Yik kam SLT from his sifu. There is no need to go else where to repeat studying what have been learn




    Question – Why does Hendrik Santos avoid elders of Ban Chung Zheng Dan Kam Cho Gar Wing Chun clan since they still preserve complete art?


    answer: Hendrik Santo never avoid any one, in fact,
    for example : uses Cheung Wei Po , the most senior living elderly of Cho gar today, youtube and writing , and Ku Choi Wah's documents
    to verify and confirm, Hendrik's information. evidence has been presented many times in KFO





    Question – How can Hendrik Santos be successor of Yik Kam Cho Gar Wing Chun when he only learn modified version from Cho Hung Choy who learn modified version from Cho Onn?


    answer: Hendrik Santo is A succesor of Cho Gar via Gm Cho Hung Choy. He inherit the part of the Yik kam 1848 original art which passed by Cho Onn to Cho Hung Choy to Hendrik Santo.







    Finally,


    l like to qoute the famous Wing chun kuen saying which Gm Ipman often says
    " Studying doesnt discriminate if one is junior or senior in age, the one who has master the art is the teacher."

    and

    the qoute from Gm Lee Kong , todays top Fujian white crane grandmaster,

    " kung fu doesnt not come from relative relationship"
    Last edited by Hendrik; 05-08-2014 at 06:29 PM.

  5. #5
    Yik kam, Cho gar Wck, and Emei 12 zhuang mother art connection.




    Aware or not ,

    the kuen kuit of both

    A, The complete original yik kam SLT kuen kuit Hendrik inherited from Gm Cho Hung Choy.

    And

    B, the attached Ku Choi Wah lineage Ban Chung snt kuit , which Ku Choi Wah shared with me in Ian's home face to face at 2000s.

    Have Emei 12 zhuang kuit signature in both of them.






    With Ku Choi Wah lineage Kuit also has Choy Lee Fut signature.

    And

    The complete yik kam kuit of Hendrik has Emei 12 zhuang and Fujian White crane signature , But no trace of Choy Lee Fut or other art signature.
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Last edited by Hendrik; 05-08-2014 at 07:12 PM.

  6. #6
    the qoute from Gm Lee Kong , todays top Fujian white crane grandmaster,

    " kung fu doesnt not come from relative relationship"
    Hendrik, interesting that you use this quote from Sifu Lee Kong. Can you point to where it came from?

    What was/is your relationship with Sifu Lee Kong???

    Ron Goninan
    China Fuzhou Zhenlan Crane Boxing Australia
    White Crane Research Institute Inc
    http://www.whitecranegongfu.info
    A seeker of the way

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Tainan ,Taiwan
    Posts
    388
    I can see providing the evidence written by your own hand is going well . Now , how about that address of the museum where that old book, your key evidence, can be found ?

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by Minghequan View Post
    Hendrik, interesting that you use this quote from Sifu Lee Kong. Can you point to where it came from?
    1.
    Sure,


    Gm Lee Kong commented the above in this Facebook group a few months ago .

    https://www.facebook.com/groups/297656860373657/





    2.
    kung fu doesnt not come from relative relationship.

    Ie. Means
    Even as close as father and son relative relationship still kungfu doesn't transfer.
    A son of a grandmaster doesn't get the Kung fu of his father by default. The same family last name doesn't automatically get the Kung fu by default due to relationship


    3.
    They are many Wck researchers who works with me have direct contact with Gm Lee Kong and his students.


    As I have told you. We have a team of wcners from different Wck lineages around the world researching . Everyone has different network connection be able to get data from multiple sources and verify .

    I am just one in significant member of the team.
    Last edited by Hendrik; 05-08-2014 at 07:45 PM.

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by zuti car View Post
    I can see providing the evidence written by your own hand is going well . Now , how about that address of the museum where that old book, your key evidence, can be found ?
    Above is the photo of the original document gave to me by Ku Choi Wah face to face with his own hand.


    As I have told you. I let the wcners meeting in Boston now post the emei information. I would not take credit of others.
    Last edited by Hendrik; 05-08-2014 at 07:34 PM.

  10. #10
    Hendrik. To MeRobert ChuJack Chang

    Feb 17

    Wayne,

    1. Be able to make Happy is a great thing Robert and I will do.

    2. Great that you met Sergio and have first hand understanding on him and the possibility for further program. My best wishes for you and him. I am sure there are alots of things you can teaches him on the history and culture of Wck. Also, you guys sure will come up with good videos for Wck history and SCWC to share with the world.

    3. I have made my decision to wash my hand on Wck and become a full time Buddhist since my mission in Wck is completed. That is what I like to do here on with lots of good memories in Wck.

    Best regards Hendrik

    Sent from my iPad

    You wrote this. It can be fully verified.

    My question to you is:

    1/. When are you going to "wash your hands of Wck" (as if they aren't dirty enough) and "become a full time Buddhist"???

    2/. Now that "your mission in Wck is completed" why are you still posting here?

    Ron Goninan
    China Fuzhou Zhenlan Crane Boxing Australia
    White Crane Research Institute Inc
    http://www.whitecranegongfu.info
    A seeker of the way

  11. #11
    Sure,


    Gm Lee Kong commented the above in this Facebook group a few months ago .

    https://www.facebook.com/groups/297656860373657/

    They are many Wck researchers who works with me have direct contact with Gm Lee Kong and his students
    Great and well hmmmm ..... Interesting! Can you direct me to the exact quote via a direct link or screen capture???

    Ron Goninan
    China Fuzhou Zhenlan Crane Boxing Australia
    White Crane Research Institute Inc
    http://www.whitecranegongfu.info
    A seeker of the way

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Tainan ,Taiwan
    Posts
    388
    Quote Originally Posted by Hendrik View Post
    Above is the photo of the original document gave to me by Ku Choi Wah face to face with his own hand.


    As I have told you. I let the wcners meeting in Boston now post the emei information. I would not take credit of others.
    I cannot see what is the connection of that boston meeting with a museum in Beijing ,I am only interested in that book of yours , so please , provide me an address or the full name of the museum so I can exam the book if there is one, stop avoiding the answer .

  13. #13
    From Hong Kong newspaper "Headlines daily",

    4月12日
    香港頭條日報

    勝負都是過眼雲煙
    2014/4/11 上午 10:43:10
    網誌分類: 生活
      
    最近我在內地跟幾位武術名家交流,他們都說:「你們的詠春拳,發展不錯!但這拳種,只在南方有人識,到了北 方,很多人聞所未聞!」我聽後內心有跟他辯論的衝動,但最後打消念頭。突然記起電影《一代宗師》裏,飾演葉 問的梁朝偉在戲裏說的一段話:「人家說,武學千年,勝負都是過眼雲煙。功夫可以分南北,國家又豈能分南北? 我們不在意是一招一式,你們在意是整個武林,而我就是整個世界!」我心想:「修文者為求明理不論古今,練武 者追尋實用不分南北。」於是我說:「我們詠春拳,雖在北方剛起步,但現今已傳遍世界!」

    詠春拳由葉問宗師南傳發展,短短數十年間,以驚人速度發展。在詠春拳派的支流裏,葉問系統的成績更是一枝獨 秀。

    在這趨勢下,確實有很多投機取巧的功夫騙子,搵個輩份高的師傅,先去交幾百元,學幾個月,然後過冷河,返屋 企睇YouTube學齊其他套路,就掛牌收學生!或跟十個、八個師傅學過後,話自己取各家之長 。

    練功夫是不能心存坑、蒙、拐、騙、偷,教學更不可以只顧自己「刮龍」,過到海就是神仙,誤人誤 己。

    沒恩怨,沒是非,就不是武林!最近我在YouTube看到有位外籍中國人話,要為詠春拳尋根解碼,在網上自 拍視頻說葉問的詠春功夫,是「半桶水不齊全」,是到香港先抄這個、學那個,才修成正果。我認為,他沒確實證 據。

    據我所知,這位外籍人士最早亦是葉問詠春拳的傳人,近年才拜另一支流門下。我有責任去調查,對自己對讀者有 個交代。

    我早年曾拜訪多條支流的詠春派前輩,我見過葉問佛山的最早期弟子郭富、倫佳師傅,亦拜訪過吳仲素祖師的後人 ,還聽了許多老前輩說有關葉、阮、姚三雄的故事。

    經分析後,關於問公的謠傳,便知是以訛傳訛。但不招人妒是庸才,前人已蓋棺定論又何需妄加評說,懂得欣賞別 人,才能顯出包容之量,覺得自己不足,才是成功的開始。

  14. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by zuti car View Post
    I cannot see what is the connection of that boston meeting with a museum in Beijing ,I am only interested in that book of yours , so please , provide me an address or the full name of the museum so I can exam the book if there is one, stop avoiding the answer .

    Boston wcners are meeting Gm Fu of Emei 12 zhuang. They have the direct first hand information which they will share .

  15. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by Minghequan View Post
    Great and well hmmmm ..... Interesting! Can you direct me to the exact quote via a direct link or screen capture???
    Join that group and search.

    That simple.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •