Hendrik old hat tricks
Let us make some facts clear.
1. In Yik Kam Cho Gar Wing Chun there is no HARDWARE of Emei. NONE.
2. Yik Kam Wng Chun deny and contradict any claim connection to Emei 12 palm
3. Hendrik did NOT learn any Emei Kung FU from Cho Hung Choy
4. Hendrik did not learn any Emei Kung Fu from any Yik Kam member
5. GM Fu is not a Wing Chun guy, only making obersvation on Kuit as presented by Hendrik to him
6. Hendrik and Jim using “Similarity” concept to draw connection but is fundamental flawed
7. Many other Wing Chun groups make no supportive claims to Emei connection
8. Emei is internal art having overlapping Kuit to other internal arts as well
Stop deny these facts. Hendrik making the claim but he is not Gatekeeper of Yik Kam Cho Gar Wing Chun. He is disciple of Cho Hung Choy who was NOT successor or Gatekeeper of Yik Kam Cho Gar Wing Chun. Cho Hung Choy not an authority to declare Hendrik Santos as Successor and Gatekeeper of Yik Kam Cho gar clan. He is only authority to represent Cho Hung Choy Kung Fu.
Hendrik’s Wing Chun comes from Yik Kam Cho Gar clan and the elders of that clan refute hendrik’s claim. Hendrik is not recognize or acknowledge their authority and statements but make appeal to another Gatekeeper instead who not trained in Yik Kam Cho Gar Wing Chun hardware.
Hypocrisy is that some dismiss importance of Yik Kam Gatekeeper and insider, but then use Gatekeeper and Insider of other art as scapegoat to try proving a theory. What is reality even today still is insider information common culture among police, detective, military, govt. Stop with insider “BS” and having open border society let people deal with info as they see fit? Then see how fast our reality change. You can continue live your daily fantasyland peaceful IPhone Samsung world because you don’t know what they know.
Fact is Hendrik cannot represent true Yik Kam Cho Gar Wing Chun. Hendrik cannot represent true Emei Sup Yi Zhuang. Hendrik cannot represent true White Crane Kung Fu. Yet he is the one imagining and fabricating such ridiculous claims playing peoples ignorance. If hendrik is not representative then it means he is a mouse with a 7-11 mouth.
As far as similar Kuit between different kung fu is nothing special at all. Want to talk DNA with mouse? Difference between different kung fu is like difference between human and monkey. Also human DNA and banana DNA have similarity too. Strange? Here is facts how similar our DNA are to other things:
Cat: 90%
Cow: 80%
Mouse: 75%
Fruit Fly: 60%
Banana: 50%
http://genecuisine.blogspot.com/2011...himps-and.html
Similar Kuit argument is giant fallacy use by Hendrik.
False – Hendrik Santos is sole successor of Yik Kam Cho Gar Wing Chun by his Sifu Cho Hung Choy.
False – Hendrik Santos publicly claim Ermei 12 palms system is the mother art of all Wing Chun.
False – Hendrik Santos publicly claim if WCK is without Ermei 12 palms system it is not WCK.
False – Hendrik Santos publicly claim all WCK without the core of Ermei will die out between one generation and 30 yrs time.
False – Hendrik Santos just sharing his story unbias leave it up to public to accept
Ad hominem claims? Don’t think so. Good time at GM Fu workshop is great. Using him for personal agenda to redefining what is Wing Chun is devious and irresponsible. (Hendrik = no Wing Chun expert) + (GM Fu = no Wing Chun anything) + (overlapping arts’ Kuit) + (playing public ignorance) = Mouse in Community.
The connection of Wing Chun to Emei is as common as Wing Chun to Tai Chi to Baqua to other internal arts, but Hendrik is become like Sky is Falling Alarmist with this bullsh!t. Lee Kong is correct – Hendrik is mouse to be ignored.