Hendrick and Company tgreads all here.

[Vajramusti]

how about that lineage?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The meaning of "lineage" has become quite sloppy.

[-N-]

I have a TCMA friend who said that he had developed his "short Jin". I asked him to spar with me. He told me that he was not interested in fighting.

We have different opinions on this. Not saying who is right and who is wrong.

If I

- can knock my opponent down with my punch, I can't care less whether I may use long Jin or short Jin.
- can't knock my opponent down with my punch, whether I have long Jin or short Jin, it won't do me any good.

You are interested on knock your opponent down and not Jin . So why bother discuss about Jin types?

My Sihing and I were the only ones in our class to train body conditioning regularly. We used long and short jin for this.

He later relocated to LA and trained under another teacher. On one occasion sparring a larger classmate, his opponent grappled him for a shuai chiao throw. My Sihing used the short force kao da and knocked his opponent to the ground.

His teacher pointed at him and silently shook his head to tell him not to use that on his classmates.

Short force is a good skill to train.

[Hendrik]

how about that lineage?

It is obvious he is trying to de focus his agenda.


Let him tell the world which lineage he is from.

[Hendrik]

Please look into the mirror and repeat.



Seems you didn't see my posts on this thread:
http://www.kungfumagazine.com/forum/...-Wing-Chunners

You can't even say straight on what lineage you are from.

You seem to be more a Song San shaolin then a wcner.

[LFJ]

how about that lineage?

WSLVT. You're asking like it's a big deal or challenge question. Maybe for those who invent their own Wing Chun "technology", as Hendrik just admitted to!

the Wck technology I have developed

[LFJ]

It is obvious he is trying to de focus his agenda.


Let him tell the world which lineage he is from.

lol

Of what consequence is it really?

[Hendrik]

My Sihing and I were the only ones in our class to train body conditioning regularly. We used long and short jin for this.

He later relocated to LA and trained under another teacher. On one occasion sparring a larger classmate, his opponent grappled him for a shuai chiao throw. My Sihing used the short force kao da and knocked his opponent to the ground.

His teacher pointed at him and silently shook his head to tell him not to use that on his classmates.

Short force is a good skill to train.

Great sharing!

Technology is technology. It has its place otherwise it is not invented

[LFJ]

You can't even say straight on what lineage you are from.

WSLVT. Why would I not?

It's a tough question only for this guy:

the Wck technology I have developed

[Hendrik]

WSLVT. You're asking like it's a big deal or challenge question. Maybe for those who invent their own Wing Chun "technology", as Hendrik just admitted to!

So, you are from WSLVT?

You love to cut and pasted to twist my words isn't it?

[LFJ]

So, you are from WSLVT?

......

You love to cut and pasted to twist my words isn't it?

If I cut and paste a direct quote from you, nothing is being twisted. Own what you say.

[Hendrik]

......



If I cut and paste a direct quote from you, nothing is being twisted. Own what you say.

Sure, you can cut and paste as you like to twist as usual.


Since you are from WSLVT, is your Wck similar to the type use by Obasi opponents here?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UnehZy1sJSc

If not please show us your utube

[LFJ]

This is what you said. This is what I said you said. What am I twisting?

the Wck technology I have developed

[Hendrik]

This is what you said. This is what I said you said. What am I twisting?

Post the full paragraph instead of cut a fragment.

[Hendrik]

WSLVT. Why would I not?

It's a tough question only for this guy:

You post it after my post

[LFJ]

Post the full paragraph instead of cut a fragment.

Not a problem!

The key is when the emei gate keeper see the Wck technology I have developed , via the third party they can identify it is emei related and willing to endose it in writing with signature. It is a double blind test where technology is identify.

It still contains the claim that you developed your own "Wck technology". What am I twisting?