Page 7 of 36 FirstFirst ... 5678917 ... LastLast
Results 91 to 105 of 537

Thread: Hendrick and Company tgreads all here.

  1. #91
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Columbia, MO
    Posts
    809
    Quote Originally Posted by Hendrik View Post
    My last advise for you :

    It is your job to take out your sun glasses instead ask the sun to proof its true color.
    Only people with skill are permitted to talk like this.
    "I'm a highly ranked officer of his tong. HE is the Dragon Head. our BOSS. our LEADER. the Mountain Lord." - hskwarrior

  2. #92
    Quote Originally Posted by pazman View Post
    Only people with skill are permitted to talk like this.


    Don't expect to ask any one to prove to you why is the sun is not blue as your sun glasses

  3. #93
    As for all those Song San Shaolin related great questions by LFJ.



    The following is the signature of endorsement by the gate keeper of emei 12 zhuang in writing , endorsing the emei relationship with Yik kam Siu Lin tau set and kuit.



    So, I invite LFJ To Get the Song San shaolin abbot CEO to sign and make his statement before LFJ relate anything to shaolin.




    Life is this simple.

    Get your top shaolin guy to put it in writing before anything, until then, there is no case.

    Go a head LFJ, go to your shaolin, get the CEO abbot of Shaolin to put in writing and sign. That is the first step .
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Last edited by Hendrik; 08-24-2014 at 07:55 AM.

  4. #94
    @LFJ

    Go a head, get your Song San shaolin top expert to put in writing and sign

    similar to

    the emei expert able and willing to do with evidence putting himself behind what he address, as in this photo in the public.
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Last edited by Hendrik; 08-24-2014 at 07:56 AM.

  5. #95
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    ᏌᏂᎭᎢ, ᏥᎾ
    Posts
    3,257
    Hendrik,

    How many times does it take for you to understand?

    I'm NOT saying Wing Chun has anything to do with Shaolin. I'm saying the EXACT opposite!

    Despite there being similar movements and terms, no connection is proven and it would be silly to suggest.

    Yet, there is the exact same amount of evidence to prove a Shaolin connection that there is to prove your Emei and White Crane connection.

    You're gonna have to do better than that. Answer the above questions or quit touting your "facts".

  6. #96
    LFJ , since you identify as a song San Shaolin expert in the previous posts here in the forum,

    Get your top Song San shaolin CEO to put in writing and sign as we have on the emei,

    Until then, your speculation is as good as anyone's five cents which not worthed to waste energy.


    The facts is the emei expert put in writing and sign. Get the same from shaolin, you words doesn't mean anything.



    Quote Originally Posted by LFJ View Post
    Hendrik,

    How many times does it take for you to understand?

    I'm NOT saying Wing Chun has anything to do with Shaolin. I'm saying the EXACT opposite!

    Despite there being similar movements and terms, no connection is proven and it would be silly to suggest.

    Yet, there is the exact same amount of evidence to prove a Shaolin connection that there is to prove your Emei and White Crane connection.

    You're gonna have to do better than that. Answer the above questions or quit touting your "facts".
    Last edited by Hendrik; 08-24-2014 at 08:02 AM.

  7. #97
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    ᏌᏂᎭᎢ, ᏥᎾ
    Posts
    3,257
    WTF dude? Do you even know how to read?

  8. #98
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    226
    So did the emei sifu sign that to say that wck was wck and not shi er zhuang?

    i'm lost here, what is shi er zhuang? is it a ma or a qigong form?

    can you put a video up of it?

  9. #99
    Quote Originally Posted by T.D.O View Post
    So did the emei sifu sign that to say that wck was wck and not shi er zhuang?

    i'm lost here, what is shi er zhuang? is it a ma or a qigong form?

    can you put a video up of it?
    Please read the wing chun illustrated issue #19 article by Jim Rosalendo .
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  10. #100
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    ᏌᏂᎭᎢ, ᏥᎾ
    Posts
    3,257
    Quote Originally Posted by T.D.O View Post
    So did the emei sifu sign that to say that wck was wck and not shi er zhuang?
    He just signed to say there is some similar terminology. But we find similar terminology in various unrelated TCMAs, so ultimately it doesn't mean anything at all, although Hendrik claims it to be definitive proof of some historical connection.

  11. #101
    Quote Originally Posted by LFJ View Post
    He just signed to say there is some similar terminology. But we find similar terminology in various unrelated TCMAs, so ultimately it doesn't mean anything at all, although Hendrik claims it to be definitive proof of some historical connection.

    A signature only!!! The signature is what for? Same situation happened before as HS posted Lee Kong photo with Sunny and Sergio here few months ago. Just a photo only, HS made a lot of Lee Kong endorsement of the White Crane on wck. Then, HS was caught telling lies after the message from Lee Kong shown up by Minghequan Sifu Ron. Later on, more evidence shown up on his lying. Eventually, HS deleted the whole thread after being caught. All we can see before.

    We can find HS summarizes a lot from just a casual lunch photo of Lee Kong before and a signature of Fu on a paper today, that wck is from white crane and emei. NO evidence shown When, Where and Who did the merge. Is it professional research ?
    Last edited by Daniel Fong; 08-24-2014 at 10:43 AM.

  12. #102
    Quote Originally Posted by Daniel Fong View Post
    A signature only!!! The signature is what for? Same situation happened before as HS posted Lee Kong photo with Sunny and Sergio here few months ago. Just a photo only, HS made a lot of Lee Kong endorsement of the White Crane on wck. Then, HS was caught telling lies after the message from Lee Kong shown up by Minghequan Sifu Ron. Later on, more evidence shown up on his lying. Eventually, HS deleted the whole thread after being caught. All we can see before.

    We can find HS summarizes a lot from just a casual lunch photo of Lee Kong before and a signature of Fu on a paper today, that wck is from white crane and emei. NO evidence shown When, Where and Who did the merge. Is it professional research ?


    Get Gm Lee kong here and let him tell you the facts.

    Instead of you guys keep playing his middle man baseless.

    Get Gm Lee Kong to address publicly in writing with his signature similar to GM Fu of emei.

    Otherwise, it is just your five cents.





    Ps. As for Sergio , Sunny, and Gm Lee kong. They met there are photos to prove it, as for what Gm Lee kong told them. Go ahead, . Ask Gm Lee kong to put out a public statement as Gm Fu or emei do.
    Btw, it is none of your business whatever communicate between they three, your are not there at the spot.





    It is always easy to say negative things. But what have you ever offer at all to wcners beside "others is wrong". You offer zero.

    Sure, it is signature only, but do you have a photo, a signature and a written endorsement from Gm Lee Kong on the subject? Or just all the sour grapes empty talk whinning for months and months.

    Read this months WCI issue 19 on Emei. Can you put out a same type of quality article in WCI with facts? Until you can get the writing and signature. No need to waste everyone's time.
    Last edited by Hendrik; 08-24-2014 at 11:18 AM.

  13. #103
    Quote Originally Posted by YouKnowWho View Post


    As you have stated in your clip, the 3 striking ranges are:

    1. wrist range,
    2. elbow range,
    3. shoulder range.

    My question is, in the shoulder range, if

    - A spends 1 year in "short Jin" development by using Emei 12 Zhuang,
    - B spends 1 year in "long Jin" development (such as hook and uppercut).

    after 1 year, who will have better result in fighting? What's your opinion on this?



    How can a long Jin use in shoulder/body sticking range effectively?
    Where long Jin always has to have that 30cm clearance to operate.

  14. #104
    Quote Originally Posted by JPinAZ View Post
    Interesting. Who is/was you Emei sifu and how long have you been studying it?
    It is a public knowledge and ability now. Jim , Gm Fu.... Many involve

    Many wcners have it today.
    from Robert to Jim to Sergio to ....atleast a few dozen of wcners today if not hundred know about it across different Wck lineages . By next two years expect thousand of wcners across lineages will know how to do it .

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=J5SVdSR9_vs


    Doesn't need a rocket scientist to do it. One develop that with main stream Wck SNT set as it using formulae 2014. It is just turning on the snake engine for the most red boat related Wck lineages who have it.
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Last edited by Hendrik; 08-24-2014 at 12:39 PM.

  15. #105
    Quote Originally Posted by Bai Chi View Post
    What good would it be if the body isn't strong enough to support? External strength is just as necessary. Why bother with esoteric training that requires high level of coordination with little result? Simple twist of the hip will enabe one to generate twice the force you describe. Why focus on lazy wishful thinking and self delusion? A boxers type of punch is much more powerful, effecient and effective and does not violate Wing Tsun principles.

    What good is to speculate on things you don't know at all?

    Got nothing to do with esoteric at all but totally scientific and who says it is little result?
    You can do your boxers type of punch, but this is Wck forum. How is boxer punch fit in Wck strategy?
    Last edited by Hendrik; 08-24-2014 at 12:22 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •